creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion General Opinion
Patrick Buchanan
Pat Buchanan
14 May 2013
The Heretic at Heritage

Jason Richwine, the young conservative scholar who co-authored the Heritage Foundation report on the long-… Read More.

10 May 2013
Requiem for a Grand Old Party

Has the bell begun to toll for the GOP? The question arises while reading an analysis of Census Bureau … Read More.

7 May 2013
Who Are the War Criminals in Syria?

Last week, several polls came out assessing U.S. public opinion on intervention in Syria. According to the … Read More.

Is Christianity Homophobic?

Comment

That "loving Jesus means hating gay people" is "proclaimed in Christian churches and on Christian television and radio broadcasts."

So declares Dan Savage in his review of Jeff Chu's "Does Jesus Really Love Me: A Gay Christian's Pilgrimage in Search of God in America" — on page one of The New York Times Book Review.

Who is foremost among those who have made "anti-gay bigotry seem synonymous with Christianity"? The Family Research Council and the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops.

So says Savage. And who is he? A cradle Catholic who says he "was in church every Sunday for the first 15 years of my life. Now I spend my Sundays on my bike, on my snowboard or on my husband."

One gets the point. And in handing this review to an apostate Catholic and atheist homosexual, the Times was nailing its anti-Catholic colors to the mast. Yet what Savage alleges and the Times published is a lie.

No true Catholic church can preach that Jesus hates gays. "Love your enemies" is the message of Christ. Hate the sin and love the sinner is taught as gospel truth in Catholic schools.

This has been Catholic doctrine for 2,000 years.

Yet, in contending that America is reaching a "cultural tipping point," Savage is not all wrong.

Undeniably, the Christian view, though mislabeled "homophobia," alienates millions. Many of America's young have come to accept that homosexuality is a natural preference of a significant minority and ought to be accommodated, and same-sex unions ought to be treated as traditional marriages.

Case in point. At George Washington University, two students have demanded that Father Greg Shaffer of the Newman Center be removed for creating an environment hostile to gays.

The priest's offense: When Obama endorsed same-sex marriage, Shaffer posted a blog restating Catholic teaching condemning homosexual acts as unnatural and immoral. In private sessions, Father Shaffer also counseled gay students to remain celibate for the rest of their lives.

One senior, Damian Legacy, says he was shaken by Father Greg's admonition that he was risking his soul and by his ouster from the Newman Center after the priest learned he was in a relationship with a male student.

Legacy and his partner have filed complaints against the Rev. Shaffer with the university Office for Diversity and Inclusion, alleging his homophobia has had a detrimental effect on the emotional health of gay students.

They are asking the Student Association to cut funding to the Newman Center.

Though a minor collision in the culture war, this clash at GW may be a harbinger of what is coming, as the homosexual community seeks to have its agenda written into law and fastened onto the nation.

For traditional Christianity's view that homosexual acts are immoral and same-sex marriage an absurdity cannot be reconciled with the view that homosexuality is natural and normal and gay marriage a human right.

The issue is pulling the Republican Party apart. It is pulling Christian communities apart. It is pulling the nation apart.

Like abortion, it is an issue on which both sides cannot be right. Yet it is an issue of paramount importance both to devout Christians and to the homosexual rights movement.

What happens if the gay rights movement, as it appears it may, succeeds politically on same-sex marriage, but many Christians refuse to recognize such unions and continue to declare that American society has become ungodly and immoral?

Gay rights advocates often compare their cause to the civil rights struggle of half a century ago. But there is a fundamental difference.

When Martin Luther King Jr. called on the nation to "live up to the meaning of its creed," he heard an echo from a thousand pulpits. Treating black folks decently was consistent with what Christians had been taught. Dr. King was pushing against an open door.

Priests and pastors marched for civil rights. Others preached for civil rights. But if the gay rights agenda is imposed, we could have priests and pastors preaching not acceptance but principled rejection.

Prelates could be declaring from pulpits everywhere that the triumph of gay rights is a defeat for God's Country, and the new laws are immoral and need neither be respected nor obeyed.

The issue is acceptance. We know of how America refused to accept Prohibition and, in good conscience, Americans broke the laws against the consumption of alcohol.

Imagine the situation in America today if priests and pastors were telling congregations they need not obey civil rights laws. They would be denounced as racists. Church tax exemptions would be in peril.

Something akin to this could be in the cards if the homosexual rights movement is victorious — a public rejection of the new laws by millions and a refusal by many to respect or obey them.

The culture war in America today may be seen as squabbles in a day care center compared to what is coming. A new era of civil disobedience may be at hand.

Patrick J. Buchanan is the author of "Suicide of a Superpower: Will America Survive to 2025?" To find out more about Patrick Buchanan and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate webpage at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2013 CREATORS.COM



Comments

4 Comments | Post Comment
Sodomy is the worst abomination in the eyes of the Father. Those whose nature made them perform unnatural acts were the only offenders whom the Lord started to burn already here on earth. (It was only later that burning alive was administered -- by Christians, lovingly, of course -- for not worshiping Jesus, although neither the Father nor Jesus ever said Jesus may be worshiped.)
A civilization tolerant of sodomy must fall. The only consolation is that, as in China, the process may take in excess of 3000 years.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Peter Ungar
Tue Apr 16, 2013 7:01 AM
I would not go so far as to say Americans broke the Prohibition laws "in good conscience." There is no sin in not consuming alcohol, so good Christians obeyed the law because Christians are bound to obey laws that are not sinful.
.
However, sodomy is both sinful and against natural law, so good Christians are bound to disobey any law that forces them to say that it is not.
Comment: #2
Posted by: cathy jones
Tue Apr 16, 2013 7:06 AM
I assume Mr. Ungar's post is a feeble attempt at sarcasm (those "loving inflammatory Christians" sort of gives it away). Let them eat their children and so on.
Anyway, this whole kerfuffle is not an indictment or espousal of (ha!) some particular religious position. Rather, it is a strictly political argument: what may the government force us to do, individually or collectively? Liberals, who would pillory any organization for denying someone the "right" to marry a gay partner, would also force all other groups to provide the same right, regardless of one's very sincere and historically relevant beliefs. In short, totalitarianism. Big tent indeed.
Hypocrisy seems to be the only evil in Liberalism. But Liberals sure produce it in abundance.
Comment: #3
Posted by: O Tempora
Wed Apr 17, 2013 8:16 PM

Reference to Is Christianity Homophobic:When will someone touch on the real issue as referenced and alluded to in Levitiicus 18:22. The abomonoble, unnatural,dirty, unhealthy, and dangerous act; the cause originally of AIDs and largely the perpetuator of it;though now it is epidemic even in heterosexual being that it is contagious or carried by intercourse. Father Shaffer at Georgetown should be praised for standing against a practice so dangerous that one of a fifth of gay 'couples' succumb to AIDS. It is a matter of living a human lifestyle as intended including love for those not so fortunate to be entirely normal, rather than a civil rights issue at all.
Comment: #4
Posted by: Charles S. Merroth
Thu Apr 18, 2013 11:43 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Pat Buchanan
May. `13
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
28 29 30 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31 1
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Betsy McCaughey
Betsy McCaugheyUpdated 15 May 2013
Ben Shapiro
Ben ShapiroUpdated 15 May 2013
Joseph Farah
Joseph FarahUpdated 15 May 2013

15 Jun 2012 Dress Rehearsal for a Mideast War?

14 Aug 2009 Unwinnable War?

7 Feb 2012 Who Wants War With Iran?