 |
25 May 2012
The Unraveling Myth of Watergate
It was, they said, the crime of the century.
An attempted coup d'etat by Richard Nixon, stopped by two … Read More.
|
 |
22 May 2012
What If Zimmerman Walks Free?
Three months ago, George Zimmerman, a neighborhood watch volunteer in Sanford, Fla., shot and killed Trayvon Martin.
Handcuffed,… Read More.
|
 |
18 May 2012
Has the Bell Begun to Toll for the GOP?
Among the more controversial chapters in "Suicide of a Superpower," my book published last fall, … Read More.
|
|
An Amnesty for Stupidity
Is it fair that businessmen who fail in neighborhood stores have to close shop and often sell their homes, while Wall Street titans are spared the consequences of monumental stupidity and greed?
No, it is not fair. Yet, Treasury's Hank Paulson may be right. To save the sheep who might have been wiped out in a general financial panic, we may have to save the pigs.
Life is unfair, said JFK.
Yet, this is going to be the mother of all bailouts. Paulson will be voted by Congress authority to spend $700 billion, 5 percent of our gross domestic product, to buy all that toxic paper stinking up the books of our biggest banks.
And this is not the first such bailout of foolish and incompetent financiers and politicians.
In 1975, when its cravenness to extortionate union demands had bankrupted New York, the Big Apple had to be rescued by Gerald Ford.
Marion Barry's Washington, D.C., was next in line at the cashier's window.
In the Reagan era, it was Chrysler. Later that decade, Citibank, Chase-Manhattan and Bank of America were staring into the abyss, as Latin American regimes, to whom they had lent scores of billions, were balking at paying their debts. Uncle Sam stepped in.
Then came the Mexican and Asian financial crises and the U.S.-IMF bailouts of the 1990s. The Mexican bailout was as much a rescue of Goldman-Sachs as Mexico City, as Treasury Secretary Bob Rubin's old firm was choking on all its Mexican paper.
The great myth is that these 1990s bailouts were models of U.S. financial statesmanship and great successes. The reality is the U.S. workers took it in the neck.
For the countries bailed out, like Mexico, Thailand, Indonesia and South Korea, were forced to devalue. This radically reduced the wages of their workers relative to American workers, creating incentives for U.S. manufacturers to shut plants here and move them abroad. The devaluations also slashed the price of foreign goods relative to U.S. goods. Imports flooded in.
Who ultimately paid for the Mexican bailout? Florida tomato growers wiped out by Mexican producers, the price of whose tomatoes was chopped two-thirds by the devaluation. U.S. autoworkers who saw Ford and Delphi plants shuttered as new Ford and Delphi plants opened in Mexico. U.S. textile workers whose mills closed and jobs vanished.
Middle-class American families have paid and paid — in lost jobs, lower wages, a falling median income — to save the big banks from the consequences of their follies. And those bank bailouts are behind the trade deficits that set five records in the Bush era, reached 6 percent of GDP, forced huge U.S. borrowings from abroad and ravaged the dollar.
Having bailed out Latin America, Mexico, Asia and their U.S. creditors, we now find our own country in trouble. And how are our allies reacting?
"Europeans on left and right ridicule U.S. money meltdown," ran the Los Angeles Times headline. Italy's finance minister compares us to corruption-ridden Albania, where "a nationwide pyramid scheme cost hundreds of thousands of people their savings and ignited anarchic civil conflict" in the 1990s.
How will the bailout work? Will every bank that brings in toxic paper be able to dump it on the Treasury? Will the Treasury buy securities based on subprime U.S. mortgages from foreign banks? Apparently so. What about mortgage-backed securities held by U.S. companies and individual investors? Is there to be a general amnesty for bad judgment, or just a bankers amnesty?
About one thing we may be sure. The U.S. deficit and national debt are going to soar. The credit rating of the United States, as this nation of non-savers has to borrow abroad to save its banks, and their banks, is going to fall. We are going to be a poorer nation and people.
As for the promises and plans of Barack Obama and John McCain — be it for national health insurance or middle-class tax cuts — they are going by the wayside. For the United States is as bankrupt as Lehman Brothers, with this difference: Uncle Sam can still borrow from abroad because foreigners see many juicy U.S. assets they would like to take off our hands with their hoards of ever-cheapening U.S. dollars.
Looking at the federal budget — the five or six major items are Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, defense and interest on the debt. All are going up, as tax revenues fall. Add the cost of two wars and a bailout of U.S. banks that some estimate will cost $1 trillion to $2 trillion, and we appear to be looking at budget deficits ad infinitum.
"There is a great deal of ruin in a nation," Adam Smith once consoled a friend who lamented that Britain would be ruined if the 13 Colonies were lost.
We are about to test Smith's proposition.
To find out more about Patrick Buchanan, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.
COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.

|
 |
Comments
|
11 Comments | Post Comment
|
|
I'm sick sick sick. Words cannot describe this sinking feeling.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Marian
Tue Sep 23, 2008 2:20 AM
|
|
|
|
Re: Marian...Sir... It is hard to tell if we are on the U.S.S. Boobyprize or the H.M.S. Titanic. Just remember... it is only money. It does not give us value. We give it value. But if we do not understand what it is, it can suck the life out of our world and out of us. PDQ....Thanks....Sweeney
Comment: #2
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Tue Sep 23, 2008 4:06 AM
|
|
|
|
Sir;... You know this is nonsense. The constitution has something to say about property, but there is no marriage certificate between capitalism and the united states. We don't need a divorce. We need a bigger prison. These people have been robbing the United States for years because we give property rights the deciding vote in our politics. That was a mistake, but the supreme court approved it. So let them handle this problem. Dump it in their laps and say: Make the United States Government responsive to our problems so it will not have to be responsive to our disasters. This did not happen over night. This has been going on from the start with one part of the population feeding off the other part... for ever. When you get overwhelmed with parasites and they all think the host can take just a lttle more suffering, another drop of life blood, a little less rest, or a little more worry then they all take too much. These guys are taking too much. It is not just that they oversold the housing market on credit. They did so with property inflated in value for many years because it was not taxed. Property once actually supported the whole country. Now we all support property in few hands that pays so little of taxes that it can be held out of use and off the market for years, and years. It has a speculative value, and now we see what happens in specualtion, that once the money has been drained out of the economy to support it, it falls. You can cry Mr. Buchanan for the poor workers who take it in the neck. I guess you do not understand that this society was always for that purpose. Taxing labor instead of property is about giving death to the poor, making him work three times for the same dollar, only one of which is take home. If you will give your government no more money to turn against you, they will inflate the currency, and rob from every person on a fixed income. But here is the deal... Only God and the working man create value; and with all our jobs overseas, where they create value beyond our taxation, and with too few jobs here to create much value, and everyone who produces already on a rack to pay their mortgage, and all the interest they have assumed out of hope for a better day or the opportunity to ask for a living wage- we don't have any thing left to give.... So is this serious, or some kind of capitalist joke?... 700 Billion? How will they ever suck that wealth out of the American people??? They have robbed us and robbed us and robbed us, but we do not have it. It is easy for the government to print up the money, but it is a theft that will make your money worthless. It is worthless enough. What are you willing to live without?.... Vacations? Health care? Education? Opportunity? Children? Safe Roads? Law and Order? Peace? The Environment? What have we left to cut?.. We don't have anything else to give. And the best thing in the world is for their house of cards to fall because it is the only way we will ever see a new deal....Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #3
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Tue Sep 23, 2008 4:51 AM
|
|
|
|
Well, Indians seem to have a pretty clear idea of what should become of CEOs who fail. I wish we could show one 1/1000 of that resolve. But then again, I still remember the figure of the failed businessman in a patched tuxedo. Black Friday will never happen again because to allow failure is to admit we are floating on a dream of credit.
Comment: #4
Posted by: allston13
Tue Sep 23, 2008 1:47 PM
|
|
|
|
Re: Sweeney: Dear Sweeney, whoever you are. I have read your posts with great interest over these many months. I don't always agree, but you do cut to the heart of the matter. These particular posts cut to the heart of what my fear had hidden. Reminding me of my own truth and grounding me to what really matters. I will add, my fear is because when their house of cards falls, it will bring down many of us with it. But as you say, money does not give us value, we give it value. I find in this society money does give me value. If I have money, I am a valued customer anywhere. No matter how I value myself, the grocer won't give me food, the mortgage company won't give me free housing. Not only the necessities, but the comforts of life are not free. We live in a society that values money over people. My limited understanding of The Bible tells me that is probably idol worship. Money being the idol. If that's the case, this society is, indeed, doomed. That, I believe is the heart of the matter.
Comment: #5
Posted by: liz
Tue Sep 23, 2008 7:20 PM
|
|
|
|
Re: allston13... Sir; credit is a method of funneling general wealth into private hands, and it has bled us, and do not believe for a moment that these economic wizz kids have not fought every attempt to reach a living wage, or a fair tax that would equalize wealth to some extent, to a manageable extent. These people have milked America to the point of default... so default!!! If faith and credit are standing behind the dollar, die it yellow and exchange on a case by case basis. If the object is to have family farmers, and small manufacturers, and everyone in their own homes, then the government can be a better bank, taking less of a risk and needing less of interest than the large private banks who are so many human lice. We can say something to the wall streeters that will be painful and discomforting for them to hear: GET A JOB. See how you like it... investing all your life into going no where!...Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #6
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Tue Sep 23, 2008 7:23 PM
|
|
|
|
Re: liz...Ma'am... In this country it is the government that stands behind every title, and if it must become the bankers to the bankers it might as well cut out the middle men and help them find gainful employment. There is no reason why, if it does not further bankrupt itself, that it cannot be our source of reasonable credit for the essentials of any economy. We do not have to be robbed of all our national and private property to make corporate property if we simply refuse to support these nests of lice, and tape worms. I am a revolutionary and have been one before becoming an adult. I should welcome national bankruptcy because bankruptcy precedes every revolution. But we must try until all effort has failed to change our form of economy and government without violence, and bankruptcy would suddenly invite lawlessness and violence, when the government cannot help us, nor protect us, and actively supresses our needs for life, and livelyhood. The way to change this form of government goes hand in hand with changing our form of economy. Feeding capital more of our lives like it cannot exist without bankrupting the government is just stupid. It is not economy, but false economy for our government, and now the people are smarter than their government, and if they want the monkey of credit off their backs, now is the time to sound off. We do not have to be bound by the same rules they have used to empoverish this place we call home. Thanks, and many thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #7
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Tue Sep 23, 2008 7:36 PM
|
|
|
|
Re: liz...Ma'am; and I do agree with you about money being an idol. I think it is for this reason: That we put so many material things between ourselves and our God that the Muslims so hate and fear us. Everything, even God, and every idea, and ideal can be seen as a form of relationship. And forms change all the time. But I think it is easy to see that the best forms of relationship are informal, and without form, and mostly relationship, pure and simple. When the structure, the form of the economy, and the form of the government start feeding on the relationships within, and begin denying the needs of the people within, then they have to be changed or they will kill the relationship. Clearly the past forms do not serve us, so we are not bound by their rules. There is nothing in the constitution that says profit must be maximized, or loss denied. We have to pay the debt the government loads onto us unless we refuse it loud and clear. We need to resist it and refuse it. And yes, if we accept God, and see his light in our fellow human beings, we must act in his defense as well as our own, but with kindness, and caring, so that no matter how society is changed that it works for all as a relationship, and one God would approve of. My guess is that Jesus was trying to change our form of relationship with God into a more personal and psychological relationship, but knew that our relationship with our fellow human kind were part and parcel of that change of relationship with God. ...Thanks again...Sweeney
Comment: #8
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Tue Sep 23, 2008 7:50 PM
|
|
|
|
This is in response to your article of last week, "the party's over", which no longer can take comments yet your writing disturbed me to the point I must comment. There's an ancient saying, maybe a proverb, "what does it profit a man if he gains the world but loses his soul?" and another one I like: "you reap what you sow". So maybe we've been sowing the wrong seeds and this is a shout out from God for the whole world to hear? "We're still doing it wrong!!"
Take heart, Pat. Your words are bleak and pessimistic, yet we are taught not to worry but to place our burdens on a greater power. Now more than ever, we need to hearken to those words. Times may get tough, well times have been tough for many generations going waaaaaaay back. We have been a fortunate generation in many ways. Few on the planet, have been, are, as fortunate as we. Be thankful that for awhile, we had the best of times. It is in our genetics to survive and we will. My mindset was for a comfortable retirement, once I reset my mind to a different form of a comfortable retirement, it will be, I assure you, comfortable..just in a different way. Hope, like Love, fades, it does not die. Weep not for things past, for nothing comes to stay, it only comes to pass. Peace.
Comment: #9
Posted by: liz
Wed Sep 24, 2008 8:49 PM
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately, the 700 Billion Dollar “bailout/investment” is probably needed, given where credit markets are at the moment and what the global market expects; but, is that amount really sufficient? If we embark on this course of action, which appears inevitable, should taxpayers be forewarned that the final price tag could exceed 2 Trillion Dollars, while we all hope it can be managed for less than $700 Billion?
Over the past several days we have been quick to criticize the Presidential candidates (“one to hot, the other too cool”). But has anyone noticed that Congressman Barney Frank (on C-SPAN and other media outlets) continues to accept no responsibility on behalf of Congress, our/his Party, his leadership position, inconsistencies in past voting records, and public remarks made in the past. If we want to call McCain's temperament "hot", which it is, and Obama's “cool”, which is also true, then how should we describe Congressman Frank's temperament...hotter than hot, a bully, a blame dodger, a blame placer, or what?
It's time for one of the respected media outlets to provide a timeline of events regarding Freddie and Fanny. If George Will, earlier this week, was bold enough to "tell it like it is", in spite of his political party affiliations, then is it time for us to make a similar bold statement? Did the Bush Administration warn Congress about Fanny and Freddie at least in 2001 and 2003? Did McCain warn Congress in 2005? Have numerous Federal Reserve Chairmen, and others, been warning Congress for years that new legislation/regulations are warranted for Freddie and Fannie?
Let's see a breakdown from the press of exactly who, in each party, effectively blocked legislation that would have provided better regulatory oversight of Freddie and Fanny. Those are the Congressmen, in both parties, who should at least be voted out of office. Would it be worthwhile for a "Special Investigation" to be conducted, whether by the FBI or by a disinterested 3rd party blue ribbon panel, to determine if Civil Money Penalties and Criminal Charges are warranted for those members on Congress who accepted money from Fannie and Freddie and blocked legislation/regulations pertaining to their oversight?
Let's remember the three branches of government. When was the Executive Branch and/or the Judiciary empowered to make laws or regulations? Is that not the responsibility of Congress? Why not identify the culprits in Congress who contributed to this financial mess, no matter which Party, and at least vote them out of office? Congress tends to “pound their chests” regarding investigations into executives and Boards charged with the responsibility of "duty and care" and "safety and soundness". Isn't it time for Congress to stop dodging their responsibilities and blaming others? Is it time for Congress to get a taste of what they dole out to others by conducting "special investigations" into the behavior of numerous Congressmen/women?
Special Investigations might be the first step in tearing down the grid-lock between the two parties and two Houses of Government. Why not force Congress to act like Statesmen/women representing the "United" States of America? Legitimate dissent is expected. But should American citizens expect more than a “do little/nothing Congress” in a “continued mode of crisis management”? Are we tired of Congress pointing fingers at other branches of government, regulatory bodies, and other governmental agencies when the majority of the blame may rest at the feet of those empowered to make law – the Congress!
Yes this economic crisis needs immediate attention and thorough follow-up over the coming weeks and months, but we also need other short term and long term strategic plans for other important issues. For example, when will Americans have an energy plan that weans us off so much dependency on foreign oil and moves us in a new direction for clean energy sources while not abandoning our short term reliance on what we need today, next week, and next month? Borrowing from our two Presidential candidates is it time to "effectively juggle several issues simultaneously” (Obama) and place “Country First” (McCain)?
Should we vote out of office politicians in both parties who tend to place their own “special interests” and/or their “party's interests” above our “citizens best interests”? Is it time for voters to help “end the gridlock” in Washington in November? Will responsible journalists help identify those “politicians” who held up legislation and regulations pertaining to Fannie and Freddy over the past 8 years?
Comment: #10
Posted by: TexCitizen
Thu Sep 25, 2008 10:58 AM
|
|
|
|
Re: liz; Ma'am, I can see you are a religious person and I am not, and yet I read the Bible and wonder at the remarkable man, Jesus. Do you ever consider all his parables about farming and money, of rich and poor, the prodigals and the privilaged? Ma'am, he talked about people suing others for their tunics, and of money changers on the temple steps. He was killed because he threatened the profits of a priestly class while all about them in the land, poverty was dire. When Jeruselem was taken, they shook enough wealth out of that place to build the colloseum, which was an immense building project. There was all kinds of wealth there, going no where, helping no one, not even its owners who only invited slavery and dispersion. Ma'am, Societies live or die together. We all need our justice. We all need enough. America is not only the rich of this land, but all the people. We cannot continually feed our lives to these rich people no matter how much we love them. We have to make a stand. We have to stand together for this country, for justice, and for equality. If we are divided between rich and poor we cannot be divided between sick and well because our whole society will be weak and invalided. If we cannot unite around the soul mother of justice for all, we will go the way of Judea, and into the pages of history... Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #11
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Thu Sep 25, 2008 6:49 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Author’s Podcast
|