creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion General Opinion
Oliver North
Oliver North
25 May 2012
Memorial Day 2012

WASHINGTON — As a crowd of high-school students offloaded from the tour bus for a visit to the Vietnam … Read More.

18 May 2012
Welcome Home, Finally

WASHINGTON — Forty-three years ago this week, the fabled 101st Airborne Division launched Operation … Read More.

11 May 2012
Institutional Arrogance

WASHINGTON — Last week, this column described a deadly suicide attack by the Haqqani network on a … Read More.

Remember Pearl Harbor?

Share Comment

MARINE CORPS BASE QUANTICO, Va. — Seventy years ago this week, Japanese Cmdr. Mitsuo Fuchida led an airborne strike force of 49 "Kate" bombers, 40 torpedo bombers, 51 "Val" dive bombers and 43 "Zeke" fighters on the first wave of an attack on Pearl Harbor and plunged America into World War II. At 9:45 that terrible Sunday morning, a second wave of 167 attack aircraft added to the devastation. By the time the surprise attack was over, 3,581 Americans were dead or wounded; the largest naval anchorage in the Pacific was littered with sunken and burning U.S. warships; the best dry dock and ship repair facilities west of California were in shambles; and less than 25 percent of U.S. military aircraft based in Hawaii were still operational.

The Dec. 7, 1941, attack was but the first blow in a cascade of disasters. The following day, as imperial troops invaded the Philippines, Congress declared war on Japan. On Dec. 11, fascist Italy and then Nazi Germany declared war on the U.S. in support of their Axis partners in Tokyo. By then, nearly a half-million young Americans already had visited military recruiting stations volunteering to fight, and the phrase "Remember Pearl Harbor" was becoming a watchword. When the conflagration finally ended in Tokyo Bay on Sept. 2, 1945, more than 16 million men and women had served in the U.S. armed forces.

All of that and more was recounted this week in Hawaii at what is likely to be the last major reunion of those who survived the surprise attack. Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta was there to thank the handful of survivors gathered near the sunken hull of the USS Arizona — a watery tomb for most of the 1,177 sailors who died aboard the battleship on that "day of infamy."

Secretary Panetta's remarks, praising the courage and resolve of those who were there that dreadful day, were appropriate — and predictable. It's what he didn't say that is important. He didn't acknowledge the massive intelligence failures and lack of "situational awareness" in Washington that allowed such a horrific surprise attack to occur. Nor did he mention that America's poor preparations for war resulted in the loss of every engagement with the Japanese from Dec. 7, 1941, until the Battle of Midway, which started June 4, 1942.

Absent from reflections on what happened at Pearl Harbor 70 years ago was any acknowledgment of culpability for those in Washington who dismissed Japanese communications intercepted and decrypted at Station HYPO that could have forewarned the defenders in Hawaii and the Philippines.

Unmentioned in this week's commemoration were the shortages of weapons, personnel — even searchlights — that prompted commanders to park scores of U.S. aircraft on Oahu wingtip to wingtip so they could be protected from sabotage.

No one who spoke at the 70th anniversary ceremonies explained how a paucity of spare parts, fuel and navigation equipment — the consequence of inadequate appropriations — sorely limited how many long-range patrol aircraft could be dispatched simultaneously to provide early warning. Nor did anyone address how President Franklin D. Roosevelt and his closest advisers simply ignored warnings from Dutch and British military officers and his own Pacific Fleet commander, Adm. Husband E. Kimmel, about Japanese threats to U.S. security.

Perhaps Panetta chose not to mention these matters contributing to the devastation at Pearl Harbor because they would cause Americans to reflect on what is transpiring today in Washington. The Obama administration refuses to identify the clear and present danger that radical Islam poses to the United States. The O-Team still refers to the perpetrators of the 9/11 attacks on Manhattan and the Pentagon — and those who seized United Flight 93 — as "extremists." The administration describes the murder of 13 people at Fort Hood, of which Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan is accused, as "workplace violence."

For three years, the Obama White House and State Department have virtually ignored Iranian progress in acquiring nuclear weapons. They filed a "protest" when Iranian agents were caught plotting the assassination of foreign diplomats in our nation's capital.

In a manner akin to FDR's dismissing Allied alarms about Japan prior to the attack on Pearl Harbor, the Obama White House discounts warnings from Israel about existential threats from Iran. Having claimed credit for an "Arab Spring," the administration is now mute about the triumph of radical Islamists in last week's Egyptian elections and the brutal Iranian-guided suppression of civil protests in Syria.

This week, while the defense secretary was in Hawaii, we learned that the White House vetoed plans by military commanders to recover or destroy an errant remotely piloted aircraft before the Iranians could get their hands on the high-tech device. Meanwhile, the U.S. defense budget is being savaged in Congress. Clearly, Washington has forgotten to "Remember Pearl Harbor."

Oliver North is the host of "War Stories" on Fox News Channel, the author of "American Heroes in Special Operations" and the founder and honorary chairman of Freedom Alliance. To find out more about Oliver North and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2011 CREATORS.COM


Comments

2 Comments | Post Comment
What are you saying we should be doing about Iran? Tougher rhetoric? Cruise missiles? Declartion of War? Just Iran or should we engage other countries in a more aggressive manner? Should FDR have attacked Japan preemptively? Internment camps for Muslims? Seriously. If you were king what would we actually do?
Comment: #1
Posted by: Seth in Wisconsin
Fri Dec 9, 2011 9:31 PM
Mr. North is long on calling the President weak and ineffective in the matter of Iran, but weak and ineffective compared to what other options? Just what is Mr. North's magic strong and effective suggestion? In his last column Mr. North called the President's response to the attack on the British embassy in Terran "flaccid", yet he again failed to specify what the manly (erect? The use of flaccid was a bit odd here...) response should have been. North pointed out the the British expelled the staff of the Iranian embassy with 48 hours notice to leave the country as a point of comparison. But since we have no Iranian embassy to expell in the US, what should Obama have done? The truth is that there are few options here and no good options.
The larger truth is that Mr. North desperately wants you to vote for the war party in the next election and he is part of the team to spread the big lie about Obama. Mr. North repeatedly points out the President fails to make strong and effective moves on Iran while Mr. North never says what those moves should be. He wants the voters to believe that the war party candidate would have the courage to make the unspecified magic "strong and effective" moves on Iran when he knows that there simply are no such options. If you listen to what some of the war party candidates say on the matter you may find yourself noticing that they seem to be planing to replace "weak and ineffective" with taking really stupid and doomed military options. Think carefully about paying for another war when you go to the ballot box...
.
On the matter of the spy drone, I am willing to give the President the benefit of the doubt on this one. Some questions that I do not know the answer to that might be relevant:
1. Was the technology in the drone actually so valuable as to be worth committing an act of war over? Worth risking the lives of many troops for? Worth risking shutting down oil shipping in the gulf?
2. Was the drone in a position to be reached easily where it landed? For how long?
3. Would hitting it with a few cruise missiles have damaged it enough to, with reasonable certainty, hide the secret technology?
4. Was the control of the drone electronically captured? Did it crash land or was it brought down at a place of the Iranian's choosing? Did the Iranians bring it down or did the Chinese?
5. What options was the president given in the military's "plans"? What were the anticipated casualties?
I some how doubt that Mr. North knows the answers to all of these questions either. We have likely been flying these drones over Iran for some time. Is Mr. Obama possibly being a little more aggressive and effective on dealing with Iran than Mr. North gives him credit for? Or perhaps more that Mr North is even aware of?
.
Remember, when Regan savaged President Carter for being militarily weak for canceling the B-1 bomber program, it made good politics, but Regan was wrong. The B-1 was a waste of money because of the success with the stealth bomber development.
.
And that other question remains. This is now your 12th column since "don't ask, don't tell" ended and there appears to be no crisis of retention or requirement. Mr. North, will you ever have the courage or integrity to admit that your column predicting disaster in this matter was just political theater? Aren't you happy to report that the men and women serving in our military are more dedicated and professional than you had imagined?
Comment: #2
Posted by: Mark
Sun Dec 11, 2011 12:44 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Oliver North
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Mark Levy
Mark LevyUpdated 26 May 2012
Oliver North
Oliver NorthUpdated 25 May 2012
Linda Chavez
Linda ChavezUpdated 25 May 2012

30 Apr 2010 A Vietnam War Lesson

29 May 2009 The Failure of Grip-and-Grin Diplomacy

30 Jan 2009 Troubling Talk