creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion General Opinion
Mona Charen
Mona Charen
25 May 2012
Obama's Education Hypocrisy -- Again

    If you were a child in the District of Columbia school system (51st in state rankings for … Read More.

22 May 2012
Is Your 5-Year-Old Transgender?

A 5-year-old child with large dark eyes, full lips and a button nose stares out from the front page of the … Read More.

17 May 2012
Obama, Barnard and Women

The president dropped by Barnard College (my alma mater) this week to deliver the commencement address. It wasn'… Read More.

The Trouble with World Opinion

Share Comment

Do we care what the world thinks of us? Should we? A new survey of global opinion is getting the usual respectful attention. The Pew Global Attitudes Project surveyed people in 57 countries and found that President Obama's approval ratings have slipped a bit among Europeans, Latin Americans, and Asians — though he remains quite a bit more popular than George W. Bush was in his final year in office. (Obama is far better liked abroad than he is at home.)

Liberals tend to care a great deal about the way America is perceived globally and will doubtless be gratified that their pin-up continues to score well in Brussels and Timbuktu. They remind us that Thomas Jefferson himself bowed to a "decent respect for the opinions of mankind" when drafting the Declaration of Independence.

Jefferson had never attended a session of the United Nations Human Rights Council. On June 18, the council voted by acclamation to select Miguel D'Escoto Brockmann to serve on its Advisory Committee. D'Escoto, a defrocked priest who served as foreign minister for Nicaragua's communist Sandinista government in the 1980s, was fully implicated in that regime's multiple and grievous human rights abuses.

This is not D'Escoto's first high-level posting at the U.N. He served as president of the General Assembly from 2008 to 2009, during which time he warmly embraced Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and described the U.S. invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq as "atrocities that must be condemned and repudiated by all who believe in the rule of law in international relations." He branded Ronald Reagan as an "international outlaw" and suggested that Israel is "crucifying our Palestinian brothers and sisters."

Well, perhaps the U.N. Human Rights Council isn't the best measure of world opinion. Even stipulating that the U.N. represents only the twisted posturing of a largely unelected, corrupt, and cynical collection of thugs, are global opinion polls useful guides to anything? Did you know that 63 percent of Turks, according to one recent survey, approve of polygamy?

Americans, one suspects, pay far more attention to these global popularity contests than other nations. Can you imagine Vladimir Putin or Hu Jintao poring over these results? Ah, 50 percent of Germans have a favorable view of Russia compared with only 38 percent of Brazilians! Fifty-eight percent of Indonesians like the Chinese, but only 39 percent of Mexicans feel the same! Summon our image-makers!

President Obama's most concerted effort since taking office has been to improve America's image in the Muslim world.

The president's first interview was granted to Al Arabiya. He traveled to Cairo to sprinkle the fairy dust, and filmed a fawning New Year's message to the gangsters who rule in Tehran. He has sent multiple envoys, most notably Sen. John Kerry, to woo Syria's brutal Bashar al-Assad. With what result?

As this survey indicates, Obama has achieved very little in terms of popularity in Muslim lands. After a short spike following the inauguration, approval of America has fallen fast. The number of Egyptians expressing confidence in Obama fell from 41 to 31 percent, and in Turkey from 33 percent to 23 percent. The Pew report notes that "Last year only 13 percent of Pakistani Muslims expressed confidence in Obama, but this year even fewer (8 percent) hold this view."

Who knows why so many respondents in Muslim countries are disappointed in Obama? It's possible, based on the way rumors and conspiracy theories metastasize in that part of the world, that many believed our president was actually a Muslim Manchurian candidate and have been disappointed in the reality. It's possible they expected a complete repudiation of Israel, rather than the icy disdain this administration has shown. It's hard enough to interpret the views of our own voters — South Carolina Democratic primary anyone? — the motives of foreigners are even more mysterious.

OK, popularity is slipping, but perhaps the apology tour/charm offensive has yielded dividends in policy support? Not so much. Syria has clutched Iran even closer to her bosom than before and has recently transferred Scud missiles to Hezbollah in Lebanon — all while the U.S. continues to grovel to al-Assad. Iran is racing toward nuclear status while essentially dropping the fig leaf of "peaceful" energy. Turkey, the Muslim nation with the warmest ties to the West, has accelerated its turn toward jihadism. Brazil has spurned the U.S. by embracing Iran and Turkey.

Machiavelli provides ballast for Jefferson: "And that prince who bases his power entirely on ... words, finding himself completely without other preparations, comes to ruin."

To find out more about Mona Charen and read features by other Creators Syndicate columnists and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM


Comments

4 Comments | Post Comment
But Putin and Jin Tao do care what international opinion is of them.

Putin has slowly gained favourable opinion in Middle East, East Africa, and South America. Public opinion of Putin in those countries makes many there see him as a saviour against US. And that's only because Putin makes frequent visits to Iran, Libya, and other such places, and solidifies his reputation as an international defender of small poor nations against perceived US imperialism.

Hu Jin Tao has made sure to invest in those African countries that the West refuses to have anything to do with, and thus these various African, Middle Eastern, and South American nations side with those nations on whom the US attempts to make sanctions.

But nonetheless, the US still need not care what the world thinks of it. The US already has Western Europe, Eastern Europe, much of the Far East, and various powerful nations as its sworn and eternal allies, while Putin and Jin Tao are forced to scrape at the bottom of the barrel for the most questionable allies possible.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Prateek Sanjay
Mon Jun 21, 2010 11:20 PM
I personally am not terribly concerned with what the rest of the world thinks of my country or its government. I'm not even interested in their opinion of our foreign policy. Most of what passes for "world opinion" these days is not only nowhere near representative of what 6 billion non-Americans think.....a lot of it is based on lies to boot. For some reason, global media outlets like CNN and BBC enjoy fostering the notion that the United States went into Iraq and Afghanistan to further its imperial ambitions, a view which has never made any amount of sense to me. Seriously? If that were the kind of country we are, we'd have half the planet under American occupation by now. Personally, I am much more interested in the US being respected by its allies and feared by its enemies...not "liked." What does "like" translate into anyway - cooperation on foreign policy matters, favorable terms of trade......? What does it gain us? If those were what we were interested in, we'd have a better chance of it by convincing the relevant countries that it's in their economic or security interest to cooperate, and to hell with whether they "like" us.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Matt
Mon Jun 21, 2010 11:53 PM
Good Article. Mona Charen. I just received the following and wanted to pass it on for your readers. Never again, will we have any leaders like Thomas Jefferson. Never gain will America have any pride or anything due to incompetent, corrupt, greedy politicians that need to be sold a one-way ticket to GITMO, take all their assets to pay off the trillions they've robbed from Taxpayers, and send along all their buddies, all social and welfare recipients, and Take back America before it's too late.
KNOW HOW TO TELL WHEN A POLITICIAN IS LYING? 'HIS LIPS ARE MOVING!'
===================================================================================
THOMAS JEFFERSON WAS AHEAD OF HIS TIME! SMART MAN. IN MORE THAN FIVE (5) DECADES, POLITICIANS HAVE IGNORED EVERYTHING THAT IT TAKES TO BE GREAT LEADERS. THEY'VE GOTTEN MORE INCOMPETENT, CORRUPT AND GREEDY. THEY'VE SOLD AMERICA DOWN THE RIVER. THESE CAREER POLITICIANS NEED TO BE SENT TO GITMO AND THIS IS REALLY TOO GOOD FOR THEM!
===================================================================================

When we get piled upon one another
in large cities, as in Europe,
we shall become as corrupt as Europe .
Thomas Jefferson


The democracy will cease to exist
when you take away from those
who are willing to work and
give to those who would not.
Thomas Jefferson


It is incumbent on every generation
to pay its own debts as it goes.
A principle which if acted on
would save one-half the wars of the world.
Thomas Jefferson


I predict future happiness for Americans
if they can prevent the government
from wasting the labors of the people
under the pretense of taking care of them.
Thomas Jefferson


My reading of history convinces me that
most bad government results from
too much government.
Thomas Jefferson


No free man shall ever
be debarred the use of arms.
Thomas Jefferson


The strongest reason for the people
to retain the right to keep and bear arms is,
as a last resort,
to protect themselves
against tyranny in government.
Thomas Jefferson


The tree of liberty must be refreshed
from time to time with
the blood of patriots and tyrants.
Thomas Jefferson


To compel a man to subsidize
with his taxes
the propagation of ideas
which he disbelieves and abhors
is sinful and tyrannical.
Thomas Jefferson


Thomas Jefferson said in 1802:
'I believe that
banking institutions are
more dangerous to our liberties
than standing armies.
If the American people ever allow private banks
to control the issue of their currency,
first by inflation,
then by deflation,
the banks and corporations that
will grow up around the banks
will deprive the people
of all property
- until their children
wake-up homeless
on the continent
their fathers conquered.'
Comment: #3
Posted by: Shirley deLong
Tue Jun 22, 2010 4:15 PM
Thanks, Mona Charen. I thought your readers might like to read the following that was sent to me.
The Kennedys & others like him did a 'Hi-Ho Hitler" job when they chose to
go along with Mattoon and the socialist party! Obama is just the scape goat
for the ones before him to make sure 'destruction' to America is his No. 1
Priorty.

Shirley deLong, Artist, Activist, Writer
==========================================================================

He has got 2 years to destroy us!



Subject: FW: Overwhelming the System...Read it and Weep



Barack Obama is no fool. He is not incompetent. To the contrary, he is

brilliant. He knows exactly what he's doing. He is purposely

overwhelming the U.S. economy to create systemic failure, economic

crisis and social chaos -- thereby destroying capitalism and our

country from within.



Barack Obama is my college classmate (Columbia University, class of

'83). As Glenn Beck correctly predicted from day one, Obama is

following the plan of Cloward & Piven, two professors at Columbia

University. They outlined a plan to socialize America by overwhelming

the system with government spending and entitlement demands. Add up the

clues below.

Taken individually they're alarming. Taken as a whole, it is a

brilliant, Machiavellian game plan to turn the United States into a

socialist/Marxist state with a permanent majority that desperately

needs government for survival ... and can be counted on to always vote

for bigger government.





Why not? They have no responsibility to pay for it.



Universal health care. The health care bill had very little to do

with health care. It had everything to do with unionizing millions of

hospital and health care workers, as well as adding 15,000 to 20,000

new IRS agents (who will join government employee unions). Obama

doesn't care that giving free health care to 30 million Americans will

add trillions to the national debt. What he does care about is that it

cements the dependence of those 30 million voters to Democrats and big

government. Who but a socialist revolutionary would pass this reckless

spending bill in the middle of a depression?





Cap and trade. Like health care legislation having nothing to do

with health care, cap and trade has nothing to do with global warming.

It has everything to do with redistribution of income, government

control of the economy and a criminal payoff to Obama's biggest

contributors. Those powerful and wealthy unions and contributors (like

GE, which owns NBC, MSNBC and CNBC) can then be counted on to support

everything Obama wants. They will kick-back hundreds of millions of

dollars in contributions to Obama and the Democratic Party to keep them

in power.

The bonus is that all the new taxes on Americans with bigger cars,

bigger homes and businesses helps Obama "spread the wealth around."



Make Puerto Rico a state. Why? Who's asking for a 51st state? Who's

asking for millions of new welfare recipients and government

entitlement addicts in the middle of a depression? Certainly not American

taxpayers.

But this has been Obama's plan all along. His goal is to add two new

Democrat senators, five Democrat congressman and a million loyal

Democratic voters who are dependent on big government.




Legalize 12 million illegal immigrants. Just giving these 12

million potential new citizens free health care alone could overwhelm

the system and bankrupt America. But it adds 12 million reliable new

Democrat voters who can be counted on to support big government. Add

another few trillion dollars in welfare, aid to dependent children,

food stamps, free medical, education, tax credits for the poor, and

eventually Social Security.






Stimulus and bailouts. Where did all that money go? It went to

Democrat contributors, organizations (ACORN), and unions -- including

billions of dollars to save or create jobs of government employees

across the country. It went to save GM and Chrysler so that their

employees could keep paying union dues. It went to AIG so that Goldman

Sachs could be bailed out (after giving Obama almost $1 million in

(contributions). A staggering $125 billion went to teachers (thereby

protecting their union dues). All those public employees will vote

loyally Democrat to protect their bloated salaries and pensions that

are bankrupting America. The country goes broke, future generations

face a bleak future, but Obama, the Democrat Party, government, and

the unions grow more powerful. The ends justify the means.




Raise taxes on small business owners, high-income earners, and job

creators. Put the entire burden on only the top 20 percent of

taxpayers, redistribute the income, punish success, and reward those

who did nothing to deserve it (except vote for Obama). Reagan wanted

to dramatically cut taxes in order to starve the government. Obama

wants to dramatically raise taxes to starve his political opposition.


With the acts outlined above, Obama and his regime have created a vast

and rapidly expanding constituency of voters dependent on big

government; a vast privileged class of public employees who work for

big government; and a government dedicated to destroying capitalism

and installing themselves as socialist rulers by overwhelming the system.





Add it up and you've got the perfect Marxist scheme -- all devised by

my Columbia University college classmate Barack Obama using the

Cloward and Piven Plan.


Comment: #4
Posted by: Shirley deLong
Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:41 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Mona Charen
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Mark Levy
Mark LevyUpdated 26 May 2012
Oliver North
Oliver NorthUpdated 25 May 2012
Linda Chavez
Linda ChavezUpdated 25 May 2012

19 Sep 2008 Abortions Do Sometimes Produce Live Births

19 Jan 2007 Welcome Back to Democratland

31 Aug 2007 Thinking with our Emotions