creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion General Opinion
Mona Charen
Mona Charen
17 Feb 2012
The Great Obama Kowtow

Wikipedia defines "kowtow" as "kneeling and bowing so low as to have one's head touching the ground.… Read More.

14 Feb 2012
The Free Lunch Is Back

Leaving aside the blatant assault on religious liberty that the Obama administration's contraceptive mandate … Read More.

10 Feb 2012
Do You Speak Conservative?

Newt Gingrich knows the lingo. He makes conservative audiences roar with approval when he compares the … Read More.

Pluripotent Self-Delusion

Share Comment

Without so much as a by-your-leave from the federal government, scientists continue to unlock the secrets of the cell. The most recent advance involves a new, safer way to make adult skin cells behave exactly like embryonic stem cells.

The breakthrough that permitted researchers to reprogram skin cells to behave like so-called pluripotent stem cells (meaning they can grow into any organ or cell type in the body) actually came in 2006. Researchers used viruses to carry new genetic information into the cells. Showing that an adult cell could be manipulated to become a stem cell was an incredible breakthrough with enormous political implications. But the use of viruses carried the risk of increasing rates of cancer and the danger of other contaminants. The new technique, announced March 2, apparently uses a structure called transposon, which, according to Bloomberg News, is "a section of DNA that can move as a block within the genome of a cell." After it reprograms the cell, it can be removed by the apparently harmless addition of an enzyme.

"It's very exciting work," Robert Lanza, a stem cell researcher at Advanced Cell Technology in Massachusetts, told the Washington Post. "With the new work, we're only a hair's breadth away from the biggest prize in regenerative medicine — a way to create patient-specific cells that are safe enough to use clinically."

We'll see. As the parent of a teenager with Type I diabetes, I've learned to take predictions of imminent clinical breakthroughs with several large grains of salt. The key thing about this news is the impressive multiplicity of approaches researchers have applied to the problem. And yet, even as science is finding ways to sidestep the moral and political minefield of embryonic stem cell research, advocates for using days-old human embryos will not yield. Here's the Washington Post again: "Scientists, however, while praising the work as a potentially important advance, said it remains crucial to work on both types of cells because it is far from clear which will turn out to be more useful."

Advocates of embryonic stem cell research (who, by the way, are waiting impatiently for President Obama to reverse President Bush's limitation on the kinds of research the federal government will fund) seem almost not to welcome alternatives to embryonic research.

It's as if agreeing to pursue other methods acknowledges a moral problem they wish to deny. Their arguments in favor of using embryos attempt to minimize the moral weight of the situation. "These are embryos left over from the in vitro fertilization process. No one is using them anyway. They might as well be used for the betterment of mankind."

Hmm. Well, the cheerleaders for embryonic research probably are the same people who don't want to drill for oil in ANWR. Never mind that the tiny patch of permafrost is not being used anyway — can't be used for anything else as a matter of fact. Never mind that it could reduce our dependence on other sources of oil. The principle of maintaining nature's purity is too important.

The "nobody wants them" argument is morally bankrupt, but completely consistent with our culture — a culture that grants human dignity only to those people who are "wanted." A couple a weeks ago, as National Review's Jay Nordlinger noticed, a Florida woman visited an abortion clinic for a late — 23 weeks — second trimester abortion. Instead, her daughter was accidentally born alive (what the AP called a "badly botched abortion"). After the squalling infant was delivered, an owner of the clinic cut the umbilical cord, and tossed the baby into the trash. Now police are investigating. Murder charges may be filed.

This is Alice in Wonderland territory. That's what our abortion culture has given us. It is perfectly legal to perform an abortion at 23 weeks gestation, an age when other babies have survived outside the womb. But if the child is accidentally delivered alive first, it's murder. "She came face to face with a human being," the woman's lawyer explained to the AP. "And that changed everything." Nonsense. It changed nothing. But this woman is hardly alone. The majority that favors harvesting human embryos for their stem cells is engaging in the same kind of self-delusion: If I don't look at it, it's not there. They can flatter themselves all they want that they are "pro-science," but in fact they are trampling upon human dignity.

To find out more about Mona Charen and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2009 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.


Comments

2 Comments | Post Comment
Excellent observation, Mona. Bless you.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Juanito Verde
Tue Mar 3, 2009 6:12 AM
"(T)he cheerleaders for embryonic research probably are the same people who don't want to drill for oil in ANWR," you write. That is purely presumptive speculation. I happen to be in favor of both, as I'm sure plenty of others are. You then say, "The 'nobody wants them' argument is morally bankrupt, but completely consistent with our culture — a culture that grants human dignity only to those people who are 'wanted.' " No, we grant human dignity to actual PEOPLE, not pinhead-sized clumps of 100 or so undifferentiated cells. A blastocyst -- medically speaking, it's not even an embryo yet -- has no nervous system, no brain, no consciousness. Ipso facto, it isn't a person. As comedian Bill Maher pointed out, to equate it with a human life is like saying life begins when you're just THINKING about (having sex with) somebody.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Scot Penslar
Wed Mar 4, 2009 10:08 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Mona Charen
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 27 Feb 2012
Mark Levy
Mark LevyUpdated 18 Feb 2012
Oliver North
Oliver NorthUpdated 17 Feb 2012

6 Jun 2008 Who Do They Love?

6 Aug 2010 Case Closed: Embarrass Them

28 Mar 2008 A Filibuster-Proof Congress?