creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion General Opinion
Mona Charen
Mona Charen
25 May 2012
Obama's Education Hypocrisy -- Again

    If you were a child in the District of Columbia school system (51st in state rankings for … Read More.

22 May 2012
Is Your 5-Year-Old Transgender?

A 5-year-old child with large dark eyes, full lips and a button nose stares out from the front page of the … Read More.

17 May 2012
Obama, Barnard and Women

The president dropped by Barnard College (my alma mater) this week to deliver the commencement address. It wasn'… Read More.

Planned Parenthood: So Accustomed to Lies

Share Comment

Perhaps you've seen the commercials touting the life-saving benefits of Planned Parenthood. They're very professional, very persuasive, and clearly very expensive. Viewers might wonder why, if Planned Parenthood can afford this multimillion-dollar image advertising, it would be devastated by the loss of about $300 million in taxpayer support?

That Planned Parenthood is spooked by Republican efforts to withdraw funding is obvious — though they have additional reasons to fret about their image just now. Over the course of the past few months, they've been stung by a group calling itself Live Action. In one case, a man and a woman posing as a pimp and a prostitute (yes, shades of the ACORN prank) visited a Planned Parenthood clinic in Perth Amboy, N.J. There, a Planned Parenthood manager coached the couple in how to obtain birth control, HIV tests, and abortions for prostitutes she was told were 14 and 15 years old. The manager was fired, but not before real damage was done to Planned Parenthood's reputation.

As part of the rehabilitation effort, Planned Parenthood president Cecile Richards appeared on Joy Behar's show. The Behar show is not on Fox, so of course, it's unbiased and impartial. Here's a sample of Behar's questioning of Richards about efforts to rescind federal funding: "It's illogical what they're doing. Because if you are not going to help people with birth control, you're going to have more abortions. Don't they think of that? So besides being evil and immoral and unethical, they're also stupid!"

In the course of her response, Richards inadvertently gave Live Action more ammunition. "What's going to happen," Richards told Behar, "if this bill ever becomes law, millions of women in this country are going to lose their health care access — not to abortion services — to basic family planning, you know, mammograms, cancer screenings, cervical cancer..."

Live Action phoned 30 Planned Parenthood clinics in 27 states. They spoke to clinics in Indianapolis, St.

Louis, Atlanta, Lincoln, Washington, D.C., and many other cities. The responses were uniform. Not a single Planned Parenthood clinic that Live Action phoned performed mammograms. "We're mostly a surgical facility" one receptionist explained.

Richards's comments were also highly misleading in another way. As Rep. Mike Pence, R-Ind., who authored the legislation, pointed out, the bill "does not reduce funding for cancer screenings or eliminate one dime of funding for other important health services to women; the money that does not go to Planned Parenthood as a result of the Pence Amendment will go to other organizations that provide these services."

Planned Parenthood does perform breast exams, which are a form (though, according to the latest research, a dubious one) of cancer screening. And the clinics do provide Pap smears, which screen for cervical cancer. So why did Richards feel the need to lie about the mammograms?

Perhaps because supporters of abortion have always had a difficult relationship with the truth. When debate first erupted about partial-birth abortion, the industry at first claimed that there was no such procedure. Forced to retreat from that lie, they claimed that the procedure was exceedingly rare. When that line was exposed as false, they insisted that it was only performed to save the lives of pregnant women or in the case of severe fetal abnormality. That wasn't true either.

Behar speaks for many when she smears abortion opponents as "evil, immoral, unethical, and stupid." Now there's a moral inversion of the first order: those who justify killing a developing child because his or her life poses a temporary inconvenience waxing indignant and morally outraged at those who oppose such a gruesome act.

When she visited the United States near the end of the 20th century, Mother Teresa pleaded with Americans to reject abortion as "violence." And so it is. Behar and most members of Planned Parenthood probably think of themselves as non-violent types. They've probably never fired a gun, and they probably oppose most wars. If asked to kill a baby robin in its nest, they'd probably recoil with horror.

Think about that.

To find out more about Mona Charen and read features by other Creators Syndicate columnists and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2011 CREATORS.COM


Comments

5 Comments | Post Comment
I don't see how you can run your mouth about the services of Planned Parenthood. No they don't directly perform mammograms but they do help to get a person cheaper fees on this and other services they don't directly perform. I am 51 years old and cannot afford to pay for these services, nor do I have insurance. I had insurance a couple years ago and checked into the cost of my birth control script. If I had gone thru my insurance company {who does not pay for birth controll pills} I would have paid way to much for my pills. At Planned Parenthood my pills are around $20. At the pharmacys' whose prices I checked the same pills were over $60 a month.
So to me it seems pretty petty to argue about whether they perform mammograms or not. Or whether someone lied. My guess is that he misspoke. I suppose you would never do that!!
As for government funding, they do more than abortions, a lot more. I would not be getting my yearly exams, pills or antibiotics for my female problems at a discounted price that I can afford if there wasn't some help from the government. If you can find cheaper options you let me know.
As for an abortion, I would never get one but that is my decision, not yours or anyone else to decide for me.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Chris
Sat Apr 2, 2011 8:35 AM
You are right Chris. I work for a TitleX clinic that does similiar services as Planned Parenthood. Where our patients would go if not for our clinic is a mystery. Pregnancies, STD's, coat-hanger abortions, HIV and cancer increases would be off the charts. We don't do abortions. We don't do mamograms either in our office. But neither do Doctors!! Live Action should maybe call 30 Doctors offices in poor communities and ask them if they do mammograms IN THEIR OFFICES. They do the clinical breast exm and refer them to hospitals to do the mammogram. Mona likes to twist the facts in an attempt to make her articles make sense. And referring to a child as a "temporary inconvenience"?? Now that was funny!! Unless they are giving the child up for adoption or locking them in a cage or closet, theres nothing temporary about it!
Comment: #2
Posted by: j
Mon Apr 4, 2011 7:33 AM
Chris and j:

I believe that Mona's point was that Richards lied about mammograms. She is the one that stated their mammogram service would be lost if the funding was cut. And J: TitleX clinic is similar, but not the same... my personal past experience (that has been many years since I was President of Jamestown Chose Life) is that the Planned Parent centers are dishonest and attempt to steer women into abortions.

Thank you
Comment: #3
Posted by: keith terrill
Mon Apr 4, 2011 8:36 AM
DEAR CONGRESS, LAST YEAR I MISMANAGED MY FUNDS AND THIS YEAR I CANNOT DECIDE ON A BUDGET. UNTIL I HAVE COME TO A UNIFIED DECISION THAT FITS ALL OF MY NEEDS AND INTERESTS, I WILL HAVE TO SHUT DOWN MY CHECKBOOK AND WILL NO LONGER BE ABLE TO PAY MY TAXES. I'M SURE YOU'LL UNDERSTAND. THANK YOU...
Comment: #4
Posted by: Shirley deLong
Sun Apr 10, 2011 11:04 AM
Re: Chris

Check the dosage of those pills provided by planned parenthood. You will notice the milligrams or whatever unit of measurement is used, is a lot less and unreliable at best. Research that and you will probably note that the medicine in intentionally inept and of such low dosage as to be completely useless in preventing pregnancies in any real significant numbers... HA! I wonder how much you were paid to post your comment...j, too for that matter.
Comment: #5
Posted by: John
Wed Apr 13, 2011 2:19 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Mona Charen
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Mark Levy
Mark LevyUpdated 26 May 2012
Oliver North
Oliver NorthUpdated 25 May 2012
Linda Chavez
Linda ChavezUpdated 25 May 2012

19 Aug 2011 Ingratitude, Insolence and Entitlement

1 Jun 2007 What Castro and Merkel Agree On

30 Mar 2007 Permission to Celebrate Jamestown?