creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion General Opinion
Mona Charen
Mona Charen
14 May 2013
Obama Administration Scraps Free Speech

Two years ago, this column, along with others, raised an alarm about the Obama administration's decision … Read More.

10 May 2013
Hawking's Moral Calculus

Stephen Hawking, the world-renowned physicist and celebrity, has cancelled a planned trip to Israel to … Read More.

7 May 2013
Benghazi Ghosts Haunt White House

My iPhone buzzes on a regular basis with "news alerts" from Politico, The Hill and other sources. … Read More.

Is John Edwards' Fall a Tragedy?

Comment

The Washington Post has issued a post-mortem on the career of John Edwards ("American Dream is Irrevocably Undone") and finds tragedy and pathos. "The man born Johnny Reid Edwards had it. Great gobs of potential." He might have been, the Post laments, "a great husband, could have been an enduring statesman ... president."

But fate intervened. With his indictment on misuse of campaign funds last week, "America witnessed the latest distasteful episode in ... (the) fall from grace of a political comet."

Grace, as any unblinkered observer could detect, is not a word that ever belonged in the same sentence with John Edwards. But from the beginning of his political career, liberal enthusiasts gushed about his talents. He was, People magazine pronounced, America's "sexiest politician." Nicholas Lemann of The New Yorker called him "the next Bill Clinton" — without irony. Katie Couric was impressed by more than his looks: "He was the first to raise issues like poverty, universal health care and climate change," she said. "He bucked the conventional wisdom and took political risks, speaking honestly about why he wanted to raise taxes, for example." Ah, yes, bucking the conventional wisdom by talking about universal health care and climate change.

The Washington Post doubtless speaks for Couric and her crowd when it sees in Edwards' fall "the spiral of the Great Man."

In fact, John Edwards, Mr. For the Little Guy, who, in his own words, "represent(ed) people who were in very difficult places in their lives and tr(ied) to give them a shot," made his fortune as an ambulance chaser. No one who examined his career as a fortune-hunting, slick, and unscrupulous trial lawyer should find any inconsistency in his later incarnation as a manipulative, mendacious, and morally bankrupt politician.

As a trial lawyer, Edwards specialized in suing obstetricians after the birth of babies with cerebral palsy. Employing junk science and theatrical courtroom oratory, he convinced juries that the doctors' failure to perform Caesarean sections soon enough caused the disorder. The Edwards technique included speaking for the unborn child. In his summation at one such trial, an emotional Edwards told the jury: "She speaks to you through me. And I have to tell you right now — I didn't plan to talk about this — right now, I feel her. I feel her presence. She's inside me, and she's talking to you."

The jury came back with a $6.5 million verdict in that case.

It was one of 60 such cases Edwards handled during his career — half of the verdicts were for more than $1 million. Trial lawyers usually pocket between 30 and 40 percent of jury awards. And though Edwards claimed that he was proud of his career, and that he gave "little guys" a shot, The New York Times quoted a fellow trial lawyer: "He took only those cases that were catastrophic, that would really capture a jury's imagination. He paints himself as a person who was serving the interests of the downtrodden, the widows and the little children. Actually, he was after the cases with the highest verdict potential."

It never troubled Edwards' sleep that studies have shown no connection between delivery-room decisions and cerebral palsy. A 1989 report from the Institute of Medicine argued that obstetricians were being falsely blamed. Lawsuits like those Edwards filed led to the widespread use of fetal monitors during hospital deliveries. The result has been a surge in the number of Caesarean deliveries, many of them unnecessary. This, in turn, has contributed to complications like infection, blood clots, longer recovery times, and more maternal deaths, to say nothing of the increased medical costs.

And here's a bitter postscript: Despite the increased use of fetal monitors and the much readier resort to C-sections, the incidence of cerebral palsy in the population has remained unchanged. In fact, a study in Sweden suggests C-sections may increase the incidence of cerebral palsy.

Additionally, thanks to Edwards and his colleagues, medical malpractice insurance rates for obstetricians have skyrocketed, leading many doctors to abandon the field. It is poor women, not the rich who can travel more easily, who suffer most from doctor shortages.

Mr. For The Little Guy adamantly opposed legislation that would have capped damage awards and set up a fund for the 99 percent of brain-damaged children who did not win big verdicts. There were "two Americas" all right — those whose misfortune Edwards could profitably exploit, and the rest.

Between the 2004 and 2008 campaigns, Mr. FTLG joined Fortress Investment Group, a hedge fund. While acknowledging that making money was "a good thing, too," Edwards stressed that he was primarily motivated by a desire to learn more about financial markets and their relationship to poverty. Where, oh where, was the press's gag meter?

Edwards seduced a cooperative press corps with ostentatious displays of affection for his stricken wife — "the love of my life" — including annual visits to the Wendy's where the couple supposedly passed their first anniversary.

Fall of a great man? How far can a worm fall?

To find out more about Mona Charen and read features by other Creators Syndicate columnists and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com

COPYRIGHT 2011 CREATORS.COM



Comments

2 Comments | Post Comment
Yep, you got it, Mona. But you are too polite using the term "worm". Edwards is a snake, the worst kind. And the first words in the Post article to tick me off were "...fate intervened." When do these news people begin associating consequences with idiotic decisions?
Comment: #1
Posted by:
Tue Jun 7, 2011 1:17 PM
Mona, you are nuts. I usually like your columns, but this one is way off base. You know nothing about Cerebral Palsy or how it comes to be. In order for a CP lawsuit to have any basis there must have been a anoxic event. That means a documented period where the baby did not get air during or before delivery. If it was caused by the OB, then yes, they are liable and should be. Why don't you look into Child Neurology for the cause of CP, rather than an outdated study by the Institute of Medicine. (Don't you think the doctors try to protect there own?) Your obvious lack of empathy to the families who are then given this crippled baby to raise after OB error is incredible. As the parent of a significantly handicapped CP child and a staunch Republican, I assure you that any of us would trade millions of dollars for a healthy child. We live with broken hearts and dreams for the rest of our lives. Your ignorance is sickening to me and parents like me. It is not easy to win a birth injury lawsuit, the facts must be there. I am glad that incompetent OBs are leaving practice. We all should be. It is called survival of the fittest. If an OB has incredibly high premiums, it is because they have been sued and lost more than once, not because they are victims of frivolous lawsuits filed against other OBs. Many states have these lawsuits go to Tribunals first to verfiy that they are not firvolous. Get you facts straight: lack of oxygen causes CP. If the OB was responsible for causing the lack of oxygen by not delivering early enough via C section, then the OB caused the CP. It's simple as that. Personally, I find that these cases are the only thing that John Edwards ever did that was respectful. And if you want to believe the Swedish studies, maybe you should trust them so much that you go there next time you need serious medical care. I doubt you trust them that much.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Dr. Mom
Thu Jun 9, 2011 6:10 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Mona Charen
May. `13
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
28 29 30 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31 1
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Betsy McCaughey
Betsy McCaugheyUpdated 15 May 2013
Ben Shapiro
Ben ShapiroUpdated 15 May 2013
Joseph Farah
Joseph FarahUpdated 15 May 2013

23 Mar 2012 It Does Matter How You Vote

19 Nov 2010 Why Sarah Palin Shouldn't Run

11 Dec 2012 A Victory for Demagoguery