opinion web
Liberal Opinion General Opinion
Mona Charen
Mona Charen
10 Feb 2016
Day of the Demagogues

As the results of New Hampshire's primary were coming in Tuesday night, some commentators on Twitter were … Read More.

5 Feb 2016
An Open Letter to Jeb Bush

Dear Gov. Bush: There are many ways to express your love of country. One is to serve as president. In your case,… Read More.

27 Jan 2016
What's a Party For?

What is a political party? By the intensity of internecine conflict among Republicans, you might conclude … Read More.

Health Care Bill Is the Ball Game


You might suppose that President Obama has his hands full running two wars, administering General Motors, "rescuing" the banking system, attempting to empower unions over management, hushing up whispers about hypocrisy regarding Guantanamo detainees, managing the mortgage crisis, imposing "clean energy" on the nation, handling nuclear North Korea and nearly nuclear Iran, "stimulating" the economy, reviving the "peace process" between Palestinians and Israelis, inaugurating a new relationship with Russia and with the Muslim world, and reversing the rise of the world's oceans, but no, he has one more agenda item — overhauling U.S. health care.

The administration is hoping that a health bill will be voted on by early August, which may be overly optimistic but still means that this summer will be dominated by the health care debate. Its outcome will determine the overall success or failure of Obama's effort to torque America toward the European model of statism. It isn't just that the health care sector accounts for 17 percent of the U.S. economy. It is also the case that if enacted, a nationalized health service — no matter how crushingly expensive or bureaucratic — will vitiate arguments about the proper scope of government. All future pleas for reducing the size of the state will run into the accusation that the small government advocate is eager to take antibiotics from the mouth of a child or insulin from a diabetic.

Whereas the Clinton administration advertised the overhaul of American health care primarily as a means of covering the uninsured, President Obama is making the bolder claim that revamping health care is a way to save money. Really? Medicare is already the program that ate the government, scheduled to go into bankruptcy itself in 2019. As the trustees report put it, "while Medicare's annual costs were 3.2 percent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in 2008, or about three quarters of Social Security's, they are projected to surpass Social Security expenditures in 2028 and reach 11.4 percent of GDP in 2083." Or consider the Massachusetts health care reform introduced by Mitt Romney. Like every other government health care program, Romney's has vastly exceeded cost projections. Initially projected at $125 million per year, the program actually cost taxpayers $133 million in 2007, $647 million in 2008, $869 million in 2009, and could top $1.1 billion next year.

"Health care costs," President Obama intoned as he kicked off a summit on the subject, are "causing a bankruptcy every 30 seconds." Cord Blomquist on observed that in 2008, a big year for bankruptcies, there were a total of 1.1 million bankruptcies.

Adding up Obama's numbers — 120 bankruptcies per hour times 24 hours in a day and 365 days in a year equals 1,051,200 bankruptcies per year — would suggest that only 100,000 of those were for non-medical expenses. Does that make sense in the midst of a collapsing housing market? The study Obama based his numbers on was flawed in other ways as well, as ABC's Gary Langer posted on the ABC News website.

Beware of politicians bearing statistics. But what is even more galling than misleading (or outright false) statistics is to watch politicians rail about the expense of health insurance without once acknowledging their own role in jacking up the price. Health care is expensive of course — though it also delivers value (improved quality and length of life). But our jerry-built system has made buying insurance much more expensive than it should be. State mandates require insurance companies to cover a variety of specialized medical services (usually at the behest of lobbyists for the relevant service providers) including: in vitro fertilization, marriage therapy, smoking cessation classes, hormone replacement therapy, chiropractor visits, and so on. That makes it impossible for companies to offer cheap, no-frills, high-deductible plans for the young and healthy. As Sally Pipes notes in "The Top Ten Myths of American Health Care" (Pacific Research Institute), there were only 252 mandates in force 30 years ago. Today there are 1901, an average of 38 per state.

Government involvement in the health care system, through mandates, reduced competition (such as forbidding shopping for insurance across state lines), and a skewed tax deduction that permits only employers and not employees to deduct the cost of health coverage, has made health care more expensive than it ought to be. Yet President Obama proposes that hair of the dog — vastly more government involvement — will bring down costs and improve quality.

If he follows the lead of Great Britain, Canada, or other systems he admires, he can definitely bring down costs. He can do it the way they have, by rationing care. But Americans should bear in mind this summer that when the president promises to get health care costs under control he is really promising less care. There is a better way. More competition, not less. More market discipline, not less. This will affect every American for generations to come. The stakes could hardly be higher.

To find out more about Mona Charen and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at



2 Comments | Post Comment
Obama and his greedy administration are all living in a 'dream world!' Taxpayers hope they come back to earth, shortly, and eliminate and cut everything in government, including politicians. Common sense tells everyone that Americans are going to have to go back to the 'PAY AS YOU GO' for everything, including healthcare and medicine! Taxpayers need to seek out a President, Vice President, Secretary and Treasurer to run this country like a business before it's too late. It's a known fact the politicians have entirely too much time on their hands and this, Folks, has put America into bankruptcy!

'Pair ready to tackle health care overhaul', states Ms. Sebelius and Ms. DeParle! Why haven't they already 'overhauled' this system! They've been around the DC block a time or two! Taxpayers say 'thanks, but no thanks!' These seasoned politicians know it won't work. They have too much time on their hands. It's obvious this led Freddie, Fannie, HUD, AIG, Automakers, and anyone else taking Taxpayers' money, for endless money pits, into

It's time to go back to the 'pay as you go' for doctors and hospitals! 'Fair Tax', to include property, should be top priority! Everyone must pay their share, including politicians! Otherwise, it's 'Discrimination against Taxpayers!'

Politicians salaries and retirements should be cut to $12,000.00 yearly! If this isn't acceptable, then Taxpayers will sell them a one-way ticket to the foreign country they sold America to, take assets to pay the trillions they've
borrowed without Taxpayers' consent! After bankrupting America, these are the only options; unless, of course, they prefer to be sent to Guantanamoas some politicians are no better than the ones sitting in prisons; therefore,
along with rest of killers, rapists, and thieves, of all races, this is where they need to be!

"Putting the cart before the horse"! When politicians took over, the Moonshiners' stills, for the revenue of course, started bottling, selling the booze, locking you up for drinking it, and furnishing a tax-paid attorney, clothes, medicine, and food. Exorbitant costs and an endless money pit for Taxpayers, wouldn't you say? Politicians, now, want to build infrastructures without having textile and manufacturing jobs in America!
Another 'Cart before the horse' hair-brained scheme!

Taxpayers want Obama to live up to his stated 'he'd go over line by line and eliminate the endless money pits!' Well, what's he waiting for?

Comment: #1
Posted by: Shirley deLong
Fri Jun 12, 2009 4:11 PM
Having just returned from a trip to Europe, it strikes me that all those who wish to minic the "grand" system of European and Canadian health care should do some homework before committing the US to such a system. In the "Irish Examiner" (Cork, Ireland), June 15, 2009, pg. 22, there is a "rate of tax,levy, health contribution and PRSI payable with effect as of May 1 this year". These rates are for a single person, and in Euro, which I will convert as $1.40 = 1 Euro.
Employees: income tax PRSI health levy income levy total
1) 0 to 15,028 E ($21039.20) 20% 4% 0 0 24%
2) 15,029E to 26,000E ($36,400) 20% 4% 0 2% 26%
3) 26,001E to 36,400E ($50,960) 20% 4% 4% 2% 30%
4) 36,401E to 75,036E ($105,050) 41% 4% 4% 2% 51%
5) 75,037E to 174,980E ($244,972) 41% 0 5% 4% 50%
6) 174,981E and more 41% 0 5% 6% 52%
Self Employed
same slary scale
1) 20% 3% 0 0 23%
2) 20% 3% 0 2% 25%
3) 20% 3% 4% 2% 29%
4) 41% 3% 4% 2% 50%
5) 41% 3% 5 % 4% 53%
6) 41% 3% 5% 6% 55%
Oh, and did I mention that auto licensing and insurance is very expensive? And that VAT (value added tax) is added to almost everything that one uses on a daily basis...16%!! And that almost everyone has PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE in order, as my friend explained," to be at the head of the line and not to be at the end of a very long line for anything...tests, going into hospital, procedures, etc. The line may take months!" Oh, and did I mention that due to physicians and nurses being unionized, "help when one is in hospital over a weekend or holiday is non-existant", again according to my Irish friend.
When we lived in Buffalo, NY some years ago, our hospitals in Buffalo were filled with patients from Canada, who didn't want to wait for months for tests, procedures and other medical interventions. They flocked to the US and paid their bills themselves.
Yes, my friends, we have improvements to be made in how our health care is paid for, but placing the government in charge of monitoring and delivery of health care is not prudent or wise. I fear government intervention, and see a "medical czar" looming on Obama's horizon. Let our voices be heard...........NOW!
Comment: #2
Posted by: Sandy Boyd
Wed Jun 17, 2009 1:33 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right: comments policy
Mona Charen
Feb. `16
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 1 2 3 4 5
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Authorís Podcast
David Harsanyi
David HarsanyiUpdated 12 Feb 2016
Linda Chavez
Linda ChavezUpdated 12 Feb 2016
Michael Barone
Michael BaroneUpdated 12 Feb 2016

22 Apr 2014 Memo to: Republican Candidates, Answer War on Women

22 Mar 2012 It Does Matter How You Vote

8 Aug 2011 Broken System or Broken Policies?