creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion General Opinion
Mona Charen
Mona Charen
14 May 2013
Obama Administration Scraps Free Speech

Two years ago, this column, along with others, raised an alarm about the Obama administration's decision … Read More.

10 May 2013
Hawking's Moral Calculus

Stephen Hawking, the world-renowned physicist and celebrity, has cancelled a planned trip to Israel to … Read More.

7 May 2013
Benghazi Ghosts Haunt White House

My iPhone buzzes on a regular basis with "news alerts" from Politico, The Hill and other sources. … Read More.

Hating the New York Times, Part 573

Comment

In honor of the Jewish New Year, which reaches its culmination on Yom Kippur, a solemn day of fasting and repentance that falls this year on Oct. 9, I'd like to take a moment to recognize the open Jew-baiting that is enthusiastically enjoyed by our nation's leading newspaper.

The Oct. 7 edition of the New York Times featured a cheerful article about a video that is circulating on the web called "The Great Schlep." It stars (if that's the right word) a comedienne named Sarah Silverman. The Times identifies Silverman as having "created an Internet sensation" back in January with a video that "declared, in the starkest possible language, that she was having a torrid affair with the actor Matt Damon." That's New York Times speak. If you look it up, the video is called "I'm F-ing Matt Damon." Ms. Silverman is all class. But hey, she's obviously mainstream. Her video won an Emmy for Outstanding Original Music and Lyrics. That's 21st century American popular culture folks. Didn't "It's Hard Out Here for a Pimp" win an Oscar?

Silverman's new video is equally sexually vulgar but adds a new dimension. She begins her little romp by offering that if Barack Obama loses the election in November, she plans to blame the Jews (picture of a hooked nose in background). Yes, says Silverman, she's aware that Jews are the most "liberal, scrappy, civil-rightsey people there are" but some Jews, specifically those in Florida otherwise known as grandma and grandpa, are not planning to vote for Obama because he has a "scary name." She then proposes that younger Jews persuade their grandparents to vote for Obama by showing them how much blacks and Jews have in common. They all love "Cadillacs," and "things and bling and money and jewelry." Younger Jews can swing the election by threatening not to visit their grandparents unless they pull the lever for The One.

The Times finds it charming: "… to Ms.

Silverman these provocative comedy bits are all reflections of a consistent sensibility, one that trusts her audience will know when she is totally kidding and when is only sort of kidding." And if Barack Obama "emerges victorious on Election Day, with the swing state Florida in his win column, a modicum of credit may be due Sarah Silverman."

As Silverman admits in the Times profile, she isn't really Jewish. Though she comes from a Jewish background and can pronounce a few Yiddish words, she is not a Jew. "I have no religion. But culturally I can't escape it. I'm very Jewish."

Maybe from the point of view of the Times she is. And certainly because she claims Jewish ancestry, she gets a blanket immunity from the charge of anti-Semitism — and apparently from the charge of racism as well.

Silverman may think of herself as edgy and new, but she is actually a stereotype herself — the non-Jewish Jew who substitutes liberal politics for religion. For at least a century, large numbers of nominally Jewish Americans have demonstrated far more attachment to liberal politics than to actual Judaism. They declare that Judaism demands social justice, equality, gun control, liberal abortion laws, and an increase in the capital gains tax and they adhere to these tenets, well, religiously. Columnist and radio personality Dennis Prager likes to say that Jews are the most religious people in America — but their religion is not Judaism. (This does not include observant Jews.)

Judaism does command social justice of course — just start with the prophets. But normative Judaism is not the Democratic Party at prayer. Abortion, for example, is traditionally forbidden except to save the life of the mother. The Ten Commandments take a dim view of open marriage. Capital punishment is sanctioned for some crimes. And above all, Judaism demands that human beings worship God, not themselves.

It's a free country and secular Jews can believe and say whatever they like. But it is tiresome as well as false for them to parade their liberalism as the authentic expression of a great faith.

To find out more about Mona Charen and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.



Comments

2 Comments | Post Comment
Your outrage is shared, not by me. I never found the Matt Damon/Sarah Silverman skit offensive. I see them as God's children playing amongst the rubble and garbage and debris of what could have been. Shocking, funny, but not offensive. In poorer, war torn areas, children playing amongst the rubble and ruin of their homes and neighborhoods is not offensive, just as children playing in the rubble and ruin of a destroyed society is not offensive to me. This is the society we live in, it is scary and dangerous and irreverant. Don't damn the children playing in it. This too shall pass.
Joshua 1:5 I will never leave you nor forsake you.
Comment: #1
Posted by: liz
Fri Oct 10, 2008 7:16 AM
Why does the Republican party feel it necessary to defend itself against comedians? It's called satire, and you're not special, you're just the newest target of societal contempt. It'll fade, and you may regain your self-esteem and social standing some day, but it requires good decision-making and work. If you want to talk politics, then this is the politics of being in the spotlight. If you want to criticize a political party, it can only be done by pitting one political figure against another. A claim of a newspaper having an opinion? Wow, that's new. Should we thank Rush Limbaugh for all of his witticisms? I believe (here I'm interjecting hyperbole) we should just weigh what's relevant only, otherwise we're just engaging in a type of road rage, yelling at anyone who doesn't drive the way we want them to but essentially don't prevent us from getting where we want to go. Oy vey!
Comment: #2
Posted by: BiblioBum
Fri Oct 10, 2008 8:37 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Mona Charen
May. `13
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
28 29 30 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31 1
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Betsy McCaughey
Betsy McCaugheyUpdated 15 May 2013
Ben Shapiro
Ben ShapiroUpdated 15 May 2013
Joseph Farah
Joseph FarahUpdated 15 May 2013

27 Jul 2010 Russia Spies; America Apologizes

11 Jun 2010 Dangerous Radical

9 Jul 2010 U.S. Cuba Policy: A 50-Year Failure?