creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion General Opinion
Mona Charen
Mona Charen
25 May 2012
Obama's Education Hypocrisy -- Again

    If you were a child in the District of Columbia school system (51st in state rankings for … Read More.

22 May 2012
Is Your 5-Year-Old Transgender?

A 5-year-old child with large dark eyes, full lips and a button nose stares out from the front page of the … Read More.

17 May 2012
Obama, Barnard and Women

The president dropped by Barnard College (my alma mater) this week to deliver the commencement address. It wasn'… Read More.

Game Changer

Share Comment

John McCain's choice of Sarah Palin was the most inspired decision of his long race for the White House. The ads lampooning Barack Obama's messianic pretensions were skillful as well. But the Palin pick accomplished several goals at once.

It is, it must be acknowledged, a terrible year to be a Republican. A decidedly unpopular Republican president is finishing his second term. Republican party identification is at its lowest point in 16 years (27 percent, according to the Pew Research Center). All indicia of excitement — money raising, turnout at political events, buzz — strongly favor the Democrats. Further, the attractive, articulate, and charismatic Democratic nominee is an historic first — the first African-American nominated by a major party.

Who would have believed, two weeks ago, that Republicans would march out of their convention more pumped than they have felt since Reagan?

The choice of Palin has recast the entire election. Until McCain chose his vice president, the election was shaping up to be about "change." Obama was playing the role of knight errant, and McCain was cast as the candidate of the status quo. Many a Democratic speaker in Denver invited the delegates to regard a prospective McCain presidency as "Bush's third term."

McCain declined to play his appointed part. Had he chosen any of the most often mentioned candidates for the second spot — Romney, Pawlenty, Ridge — it would have been impossible to escape the sense of "same old same old" that would have followed the ticket like stale cigar smoke. However much one might revere older white guys, and some of my best friends are OWGs, there is no escaping the fact that this was not the year for such a ticket.

Liberals have indignantly protested that McCain's choice of a woman was a "cynical" bid for disgruntled Hillary Clinton voters. But I don't think that's what this was about. In Palin, McCain found a reformer. He sees himself as a reformer and a clean government crusader.

One might not always agree with his idea of reform (certainly campaign finance reform struck me as a blow to the First Amendment), but that he sees himself in that role is indisputable. In Sarah Palin, he found, as David Brooks shrewdly observed, a kindred spirit. Not just a soul mate but a gal with pizzazz and spirit! Who can resist a governor who comes into office on a promise to clean house and promptly sells the luxury jet her predecessor had bought on eBay? (She let the chauffeur and chef go, too.) Palin has confronted the corruption of her own party, just as McCain has done in Washington by challenging those among his colleagues he calls, not affectionately, "the appropriators." This throws down the gauntlet to Obama to cite a single instance when his mantra of change has been backed by actions. Has he ever crossed swords with those in his party? Ever denounced corruption among Democrats? His acceptance speech was a liberal wish list indistinguishable in content from those of Mondale, Dukakis, Clinton, and Kerry. Is this change?

McCain must also have calculated that Palin's expertise on energy would help highlight the one domestic issue that has emerged as a clear winner for Republicans. One looks forward eagerly to the day when he explains that Sarah Palin has convinced him to reverse his opposition to drilling in ANWR.

And McCain must also have sensed that a young, attractive woman from a western state would inject a dose of energy and enthusiasm into the race. On this, McCain may not have even guessed at how right he was (though one senses that Cindy McCain knew). Sarah Palin is political dynamite. She has transformed Republicans from flaccid to fired-up overnight. Just by being pro-life, small town, patriotic, and religious, she set the teeth of the media types on edge. By being all of that AND smart and articulate, and a budget hawk, she sent conservatives over the moon.

Together McCain and Palin have changed the game. They have seized the mantle of reform and dare the Democrats to show anything comparable. In this worst of all years for Republicans, it no longer seems fanciful to imagine that they can win.

To find out more about Mona Charen and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.


Comments

2 Comments | Post Comment
“We the People-For the People” will work, once again, if we elect Gov. Sarah Palin! It was refreshing
to see and hear Gov. Sarah Palin as she accepted the roll of Vice-President! Her qualifications and
background far exceed anyone that's ever run for public office, let alone the ones running now! Just
think, she didn't have to spend several million dollars just to get elected! It certainly shows the hard-
working Taxpayers that you can get elected, honestly, without the ‘show and tell' hype!

Gov. Palin's a firm believer that the money belongs to Taxpayers and not to special interest groups
and social and welfare programs! What a refreshing concept!

This election shouldn't be about male, female, black , white, Democrat or Republican, it should be
about who's going to do the best job for the future of America. For years, I've been writing about the
“out of touch” politicians who promoted Nafta, Cafta, their retirements, their benefits, and foreign
trade, with no consideration for Americans, their jobs, and the future of America!

Let's hope that Gov. Palin will continue to remember Taxpayers, and the fact that it's time to put
government back into the hands of the Taxpayers. It's time to understand this country should run like a private
business. If you don't do your job, you're shown the door!

Since Taxpayers are responsible for trillions of dollars, owed foreign countries, a debt politicians
made for Americans, shouldn't they have paid these debts in full and totally balance the budget before trying
to sell a bill of goods, again, and before putting on another side show?

Didn't you just love the “Do you know the difference between a Hockey Mom and a Pit Bull?”
“Lipstick”! I can relate to how she feels being stuck with ‘politics as usual' type people who need to change
their wasting Taxpayers' money or be asked to retire!


Comment: #1
Posted by: Shirley deLong
Fri Sep 5, 2008 4:03 PM
Reformer? Reformer of what? All I could hear is diatribe of "thanks but no thanks", bridge to nowhere, which she supported before she noticed that it might be bad for her political image (I was for it before I become against it). Reformer to overturn Roe v.s. Wade? Reformer to proclame our mission in Iraq "holy", just as Bush did? Reformer who asked for more pork spending for her state than any other reprensentative (in $/capita). Reformer who wanted to reform library in her hometown by banning specific books (1st amendment?) and trying to fire librarian disagreeing with her. List is much longer...No real reform here - just reform to send us 50 years backward.

"Thanks, but NO thanks"
Comment: #2
Posted by: Fred
Sun Sep 14, 2008 8:33 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Mona Charen
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Mark Levy
Mark LevyUpdated 26 May 2012
Oliver North
Oliver NorthUpdated 25 May 2012
Linda Chavez
Linda ChavezUpdated 25 May 2012

18 May 2010 Polarization May Be Our Best Hope

23 Feb 2010 Amnesty International: Not Much of a Reputation To Lose

16 Dec 2011 NTSB: the Banning Nannies