creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion General Opinion
Michelle Malkin
Michelle Malkin
22 Oct 2014
The Hunter Biden Chronicles

Everything you need to know about Beltway nepotism, corporate cronyism and corruption can be found in the … Read More.

17 Oct 2014
Who's Afraid of 'Rocky Mountain Heist'?

Free at last! I'm silent no more. Now, the story can be told. Democrats here in my adopted state of Colorado … Read More.

15 Oct 2014
The Centers for Everything but Disease Control

So now the federal health bureaucrats in charge of controlling diseases and pandemics want more money to do … Read More.

Desperate Dems Hide Behind Big Bird

Comment

Mitt Romney sure ruffled a lot of feathers over his proposal to eliminate taxpayer funding for government-sponsored TV. As soon as the GOP presidential candidate singled out PBS for cuts during the presidential debate in Denver, the hysterical squawking commenced.

Left-leaning celebrities immediately erupted on Twitter. "WOW!!! No PBS!! WTF how about cutting congress's stuff leave big bird alone," Whoopi Goldberg fumed. "Mitt is smirky, sweaty, indignant and smug with an unsettling hint of hysteria. And he wants to kill BIG BIRD," actress Olivia Wilde despaired. "Who picks on Big Bird!!! #bulliesthatswho," actress Taraji Henson chimed in.

Social media activists called for a Million Muppet March on the National Mall to "show your support for Big Bird, Muppets, PBS and all that is good." The grammar-challenged operatives of George Soros-funded Media Matters for America lectured "right-wing media" to be "more concerned with Americans having jobs insteading (sic) of obsessing whether or not Big Bird has one."

Indignant PBS, which employs not-so-neutral debate moderator Jim Lehrer, issued a statement decrying Romney's failure to "understand the value the American people place on public broadcasting and the outstanding return on investment the system delivers to our nation." And President Obama, awakened from his beatdown-induced stupor, scurried the next morning to the safe confines of a campaign rally to mock Romney for "getting tough on Big Bird."

The kiddie character kerfuffle is a manufactured flap that may play well to liberals in Hollywood and Washington. But beyond the borders of La-La Land, desperate Democrats who cling childishly to archaic federal subsidies look like cartoonish buffoons. Let's face it: The Save Big Bird brigade is comically out of touch with 21st-century realities.

In 1967, when Congress passed the Public Broadcasting Act, family options for quality children's programming were severely limited. More than four decades later, there's a vibrant marketplace for educational broadcasting — on radio, TV and the Internet — that teems with furry friends and information-packed shows.

PBS speaks of itself with cultish self-reverence: "For more than 40 years," the government network chastised Romney, "Big Bird has embodied the public broadcasting mission — harnessing the power of media for the good of every citizen, regardless of where they live or their ability to pay.

Our system serves as a universally accessible resource for education, history, science, arts and civil discourse."

In reality, of course, PBS affiliates have become increasingly corporatized. As GOP Sen. Jim DeMint noted last year, franchises like Sesame Street "are multimillion-dollar enterprises capable of thriving in the private market. According to the 990 tax form all nonprofits are required to file, Sesame Workshop President and CEO Gary Knell received $956,513 — nearly a million dollars — in compensation in 2008. And, from 2003 to 2006, 'Sesame Street' made more than $211 million from toy and consumer product sales."

Sesame Street has also become increasingly politicized. Under the Obama administration, Elmo has lobbied for the FCC's national broadband plan and the first lady's Big Nanny nutrition bill. Investigative journalist James O'Keefe caught former NPR exec Ron Schiller on tape trashing the Tea Party as "racist" and "Islamophobic." And the official PBS Twitter account sent a special shout-out to radical leftist group Move On last year for leading the government media rescue charge. Moreover, as I've previously reported, NPR and PBS have no problem raising money from corporations and left-wing philanthropists, including billionaire George Soros, whose Open Society Institute gave $1.8 million to pay for at least 100 journalists at NPR member radio stations in all 50 states over the next three years.

President Obama sneered at Romney for daring to mention PBS subsidies in the context of deficit reduction. But Obama's own Bowles-Simpson deficit reduction commission singled out Corporation for Public Broadcasting spending. "The current CPB funding level is the highest it has ever been," the panel noted after Obama proposed hiking yearly appropriations to $450 million in 2012. Doing away with the appropriation would save nearly $500 million in 2015 alone. Over 10 years, those savings would total $5 billion (or roughly 10 Solyndras). In these tough times, that's more than chump change and child's play.

Romney's right: It's time for government media to grow up and get off the dole. It's time for taxpayers to flip the Bird.

Michelle Malkin is the author of "Culture of Corruption: Obama and his Team of Tax Cheats, Crooks and Cronies" (Regnery 2010). Her e-mail address is malkinblog@gmail.com.

COPYRIGHT 2012 CREATORS.COM



Comments

3 Comments | Post Comment
We are $16 in debt. If we can't cut out PBS, The Count better start teaching the little slaves how much debt they'lll be crushed with when they're older. If PBS really provides quality programming, which I think it does, then it will no doubt survive in the private market or at least its shows will be picked up by other networks. Big Bird isen't going anywhere if he's cut off from the government teat.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Chris McCoy
Fri Oct 5, 2012 9:41 AM
Re: Chris McCoy The first letter in "PBS" stands for Public. Other than some religious broadcasters, everything else is owned by corporations. The term "liberal media" gets a chuckle from me every time I hear it. If we outsource or privatize everything that is now public, we should all sleep better with Blackwater guarding us.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Paul M. Petkovsek
Sat Oct 6, 2012 11:17 AM
And the word public does not mean sacred. Just because I advocate getting rid of PBS does not mean I want to privatize the military or roads or anything else. Thats a weak arguement indeed. Can't you do any better than that? People call it the "liberal media" because it favors the dems. If you can't see that, there is something wrong with you. I actually don't like the term "liberal media". I prefer lamestream media instead.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Chris McCoy
Sun Oct 7, 2012 11:59 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Michelle Malkin
Oct. `14
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
28 29 30 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31 1
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Authorís Podcast
Patrick Buchanan
Pat BuchananUpdated 24 Oct 2014
Jackie Gingrich Cushman
Jackie Gingrich CushmanUpdated 23 Oct 2014
Matt Towery
Matt ToweryUpdated 23 Oct 2014

12 Sep 2008 The World Still Blames America

9 May 2007 Jihadists Exploit Our Hospitality and Open Borders . . . Again

20 Jan 2010 The Democrats' Massachusetts Meltdown