creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion General Opinion
Michelle Malkin
Michelle Malkin
25 May 2012
Obama's Land of the LOST

What's green and blue and grabby all over? President Obama's new pressure campaign for Congress to ratify the … Read More.

23 May 2012
Jaczko the Jerk: Harry Reid's Sexist Crony Gets the Boot

The embattled chair of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission resigned this week. It's a victory for … Read More.

18 May 2012
How the Gay-Marriage Mob Slimed Manny Pacquiao

Boxing champion Manny Pacquiao is guilty — of being true to his Catholic faith. The gay-marriage mob is … Read More.

America, the Crab Bucket

Share Comment

No matter how soothing the White House overtures to business leaders sounded this week, an inconvenient fact remains: Washington is gripped by crab-in-the-bucket syndrome. And there's no cure in sight.

Put a single crab in an uncovered bucket, and it will find a way to climb up and out on its own. Put a dozen crabs in a bucket, and 11 will fight with all their might to pull down the striver who attempts escape. President Obama sought to reassure 20 CEOs that he wasn't the king crab holding them down: "I want to dispel any notion we want to inhibit your success," he cooed. "We want to be boosters because when you do well, America does well."

Take it all with a huge grain of sea salt.

This is, after all, the same "booster" who in April mused openly about limits on profits, government determinations for what constitutes a "good" product or service, and the expectation that private businesses serve a collective need to goose Washington's jobs numbers. "I mean, I do think at a certain point you've made enough money," the president said. "But, you know, part of the American way is, you know, you can just keep on making it if you're providing a good product or providing good service. We don't want people to stop, ah, fulfilling the core responsibilities of the financial system to help grow our economy."

Our Founding Fathers had quite a different view of "the American way," of course. In 1816, Thomas Jefferson wrote: "To take from one, because it is thought his own industry and that of his fathers has acquired too much, in order to spare to others, who, or whose fathers, have not exercised equal industry and skill, is to violate arbitrarily the first principle of association, the guarantee to everyone the free exercise of his industry and the fruits acquired by it."

But like a success inhibitor injected into the body politic, Obama's policies have only served to suppress growth, punish ambition and discourage profit-maximizers. He has railed against "fat cats" on Wall Street while protecting his favored financial industry benefactors.

He threatened to "kick" the "a**es" of oil industry executives while refusing to punish the scientific lies and distortions of his own job-killing environmental czars and bureaucrats. He inveighed against the U.S. Chamber of Commerce for collecting dues from international affiliates while ignoring the same practices among deep-pocketed unions. And he bemoaned tax relief for "millionaires and billionaires" that would actually benefit wealth-producing couples who annually earn more than $250,000 and individuals who earn $200,000 or more.

Most small-business owners will tell you they don't want Obama "boosting" them. They just want him to get out of the way. But none of them was represented at his CEO shindig. Instead, among the business "leaders" the White House invited was billionaire Penny Pritzker — a Chicago crony, Democratic fundraiser/bundler and heiress whose family co-owned a failed subprime specialty bank.

While Obama, the olive-branch poseur, has called for a restoration of "civility" in Washington and liberal elites whine and whinny about the need for "no labels," class-warfare demagoguery has metastasized unchecked.

Socialist Bernie Sanders took to the Senate floor to filibuster tax relief for all Americans last week in a ponderous, eight-and-a-half-hour harangue against "greed," the "rich," "richer" and "richest," and "millionaires and billionaires" he had the audacity to liken to "bandits." On the House side, N.Y. Democratic Rep. Joe Crowley attacked the GOP as the party of the wealthy and compared all people who earn more than $250,000 a year to the late convicted tax evader Leona Helmsley and her Maltese doggie heir.

The left wastes no opportunity to blame tea party and talk radio rhetoric for violent acts by lone nuts. But when a suspected serial arsonist (still on the loose) burns down expensive homes in an upscale Cape Cod neighborhood and spray-paints "f**k the rich" graffiti at the crime scenes, the "words-have-consequences" crowd is nowhere to be found. Such is the silence of the crabs.

Michelle Malkin is the author of "Culture of Corruption: Obama and his Team of Tax Cheats, Crooks & Cronies" (Regnery 2010). Her e-mail address is malkinblog@gmail.com.

COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM


Comments

3 Comments | Post Comment
Ms. Malkin, I thought we favored "the guarantee to everyone the free exercise of his industry and the fruits acquired by it". Surely that includes inheriting billions, as Mrs. Pritzker did, otherwise we would not be against the death tax. As for co-owning a failed bank, are you suggesting that people who made profits on stocks should pay back those profits should the company later go bad? Would you for example want Mr. Rubin, who joined Citicorp management when it was one of the world's most powerful banks and left with $145 million when Citicorp was bankrupt, be deprived of the fruits of his labor or to pay taxes on them at a higher rate than a coalminer? I hope not, but I am afraid you sound a bit like a closet socialist.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Peter Ungar
Fri Dec 17, 2010 4:02 AM
To anyone who does NOT understand no explanation is good enough and to those who DO understand no explanation is needed. Great article Michelle! Kudos to you!!
Comment: #2
Posted by: bill s
Sat Dec 18, 2010 7:47 AM
Agreeing with Bill S -- really good piece. But what I don't understand is -- aren't the Democrats who are in power pretty much as wealthy as the Republicans? I'm sure that MANY of them are earning (altogether) more than $250,000 per couple. Do they all really consider themselves rich? They want to pay more in taxes? If so, my hat is off to them, and I invite them to send the extra 4% directly to the treasury on a volunteer basis. This may be a deductible donation, since the government is so close to becoming a charity case. And think of the example they will be setting.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Doug Morelly
Sun Dec 19, 2010 9:51 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Michelle Malkin
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Oliver North
Oliver NorthUpdated 25 May 2012
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 25 May 2012
David Limbaugh
David LimbaughUpdated 25 May 2012

16 Jul 2010 Ken Salazar Needs Another Behind-Kicking

14 Aug 2009 The Etiquette Czar's Rules for Patriotic Protest

1 Jun 2011 Chasing Sarah: The Boys Behind the Bus