opinion web
Liberal Opinion General Opinion
Michelle Malkin
Michelle Malkin
10 Feb 2016
TSA: Total Security Abyss

While a TSA agent pawed my hair bun this weekend, presumably on high alert for improvised explosive bobby pins,… Read More.

3 Feb 2016
Chicken Little Chuckie Schumer: America's Disease-Fighting Phony

Latin America's Zika virus is the latest undocumented immigrant to hit our shores, but have no fear. Self-… Read More.

27 Jan 2016
A Tale of Two Tapes: Teen Cruz and Terror-Coddler Obama

The crack media buzzed this week with the discovery of a totally front-page, news-breaking, breathtaking videotape. … Read More.

“To Stop the Multiplication of the Unfit”


If you aren't creeped out by the No Birth Control Left Behind rhetoric of the White House and Planned Parenthood, you aren't listening closely enough. The anesthetic of progressive benevolence always dulls the senses. Wake up.

When a bunch of wealthy white women and elite Washington bureaucrats defend the trampling of religious liberties in the name of "increased access" to "reproductive services" for "poor" women, the ghost of Margaret Sanger is cackling.

As she wrote in her autobiography, Sanger founded Planned Parenthood in 1916 "to stop the multiplication of the unfit." This, she boasted, would be "the most important and greatest step towards race betterment." While she oversaw the mass murder of black babies, Sanger cynically recruited minority activists to front her death racket. She conspired with eugenics financier and businessman Clarence Gamble to "hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities" to sell their genocidal policies as community health and welfare services.

Outright murder wouldn't sell. But wrapping it under the egalitarian cloak of "women's health" — and adorning it with the moral authority of black churches — would. Sanger and Gamble called their deadly campaign "The Negro Project."

In other writings, historian Mike Perry found, Sanger attacked programs that provided "medical and nursing facilities to slum mothers" because they "facilitate the function of maternity" when "the absolute necessity is to discourage it." In an essay included in her writing collection held by the Library of Congress, Sanger urged her abortion clinic colleagues to "breed a race of thoroughbreds." Nationwide "birth control bureaus" would propagate the proper "science of breeding" to stop impoverished, non-white women from "breeding like weeds."

Speaking with CBS veteran journalist Mike Wallace in 1957, long after her racist views had supposedly mellowed, Sanger again revealed her true colors: "I think the greatest sin in the world is bringing children into the world — that have disease from their parents, that have no chance in the world to be a human being practically. Delinquents, prisoners, all sorts of things just marked when they're born. That to me is the greatest sin — that people can — can commit."

Sanger also elaborated on her anti-Catholic animus, telling one of Wallace's reporters that New York Catholics had no right to protest the use of their tax dollars for birth city birth-control programs: "(I)t's not only wrong, it should be made illegal for any religious group to prohibit dissemination of birth control — even among its own members." When Wallace pressed her ("In other words, you would like to see the government legislate religious beliefs in a certain sense?"), Sanger laughed nervously and disavowed the remarks.

Fast forward: Five decades and 16 million aborted black babies later, Planned Parenthood's insidious agenda has migrated from inner-city "birth control bureaus" to public school-based health clinics to the White House — forcibly funded with taxpayer dollars just as Sanger championed.

Several undercover stings by Live Action, pro-life documentarians, have exposed Planned Parenthood staff accepting donations over the years from callers posing as eugenics cheerleaders who wanted to earmark their contributions for the cause of aborting minority babies.

"We can definitely designate it for an African-American," a Tulsa, Okla., Planned Parenthood employee eagerly promised.

What has cheap, easy and unmonitored "choice" for poor women in inner cities wrought? Nightmares like the Philadelphia Horror, where serial baby-killer Dr. Kermit Gosnell and his abortion clinic death squad oversaw the systematic execution of hundreds of healthy, living, breathing, squirming, viable black and Hispanic babies over 40 decades — along with several minority mothers who may have lost their lives in his grimy birth control bureau.

City and state authorities looked the other way while jars of baby parts and reports of botched abortions and infanticides piled up. Beltway Democrats who now bray about their concern for "women's health" were silent about the Gosnell massacre and countless others like it in America's ghettos. Why?

The Obama administration is crawling with the modern-day heirs of the eugenics movement, from Planned Parenthood golden girl Kathleen Sebelius at the Department of Health and Human Services to the president's prestigious science czar John Holdren — an outspoken proponent of forced abortions and mass sterilizations and a self-proclaimed protege of eugenics guru Harrison Brown, whom he credits with inspiring him to become a scientist.

Brown envisioned a government regime in which the "number of abortions and artificial inseminations permitted in a given year would be determined completely by the difference between the number of deaths and the number of births in the year previous." He urged readers to "reconcile ourselves to the fact that artificial means must be applied to limit birth rates." He likened the global population to a "pulsating mass of maggots."

Listen carefully as this White House dresses its Obamacare abortion mandate in the white lab coat of "reproductive services" for all. The language of "access to birth control" is the duplicitous code of Sanger's ideological grim reapers.

Michelle Malkin is the author of "Culture of Corruption: Obama and his Team of Tax Cheats, Crooks & Cronies" (Regnery 2010). Her e-mail address is



10 Comments | Post Comment
If the Catholic Church can have a dispensation from laws which apply to all Americans, then Mormons have the religious right to polygamy.
Comment: #1
Posted by: demecra zydeem
Fri Feb 10, 2012 8:36 AM
Demecra, sorry, one size fits all comments don't work if you are not on automatic pilot. I read your comment before, under Buchanon. Didn't you think Sanger's thoughts deserved some type of real thought? Do you agree with her, especially about the "Negro Project"? How does it feel to be a follower of such programs, and are you doing your part to "breed a race of thoroughbreds"? Pardon me if I'm a skeptic. Read the last sentence of this article, use a dictionary if it helps, then explain your adherance to this ideology in spite of understanding its hateful DNA. Ah, maybe your were just born this way.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Tom
Fri Feb 10, 2012 1:37 PM
After reading many of your comments, Tom, the kindest thing I can say about you is "skeptic". I do not comment to have discourse with others. I write my comment if a column I'm reading has moved me to respond or if a comment or comments moves me to respond. I am interested in the views of the columnist and comments of others regarding the column. I am sure we are the same in that way. However, I am not concerned with how I am viewed or received by you. I'm sure you're a nice fellow but attacking others really isn't a great way to show it.
Comment: #3
Posted by: demecra zydeem
Fri Feb 10, 2012 7:09 PM
Aw, golly, I was just having some fun. Liberals always defend the Constitution when it suits their purpose, you did so with Susan Estrich's penultimate column, and then trash the Constitution when it gets in their way. In that reply your referred to previous posters as "homophobes". I suppose such slurs leave your lips in a fairly casual manner, and you don't realize how hurtful your words are. Buchanan headlines it incorrectly, now your messing with the Constitution, not religion. Liberals have had it their wayfor over 40 years, now they are going to have to answer for their policies. Sophistry and plattitudes won't do now that the battle is over the Constitution. Expect a reply anytime it is attacked, and like you I do not care how you view or receive me. I ask good questions in my reply to you. They are still there.
Comment: #4
Posted by: Tom
Sat Feb 11, 2012 5:21 AM
Ok Tom, "Outright murder wouldn't sell. But wrapping it under the egalitarian cloak of "women's health" — and adorning it with the moral authority of black churches — would. Sanger and Gamble called their deadly campaign "The Negro Project."
Outrage would have been well suited back in Sanger's day, but her proposals were well-received..surprise, surprise. Those were the times and that was the accepted mentality. Let me also remind you, going back a bit further in our illustrious journey, dead bodies were dug up and desecrated, stolen and used to discover and learn human anatomy and live subjects, the poor, the downtrodden, prisoners etc. were used to learn and study physiology. Religious and good people everywhere were up in arms. When they caught these 'ghouls' they subjected them to unimaginable torture to make reparation for their barbaric work. Imagine the suffering of the deceased loved ones to know that the bodies of their loved ones were so desecrated. Imagine. But here we are, today, whatever the motivation or suffering involved, humanity has moved forward. We now use paid volunteers, or animals to experiment on and learn from, unless you count the Tuskegee syphilis experiment (sarcasm, of course I do). All in the name of science. Today, I consider myself fortunate to have the benefits of those dark times. Excellent medical care if I can pay for it. If not, I can sell a kidney on the black market so I can pay for our healthcare and contraceptives. My point is, I live in this day and these times. There has been enough suffering to bring these things about, great bright surgeons and doctors, and a pill I or other females can take to prevent an unwanted pregnancy. I stress unwanted. Look at society and our world Tom, the people who were loved and secure aren't the ones causing mayhem. "Breeding a race of Thoroughbreds" is one way of saying it, I suppose. I prefer to say bringing wanted children into a loving family and world.
Michelle Malkin is another fear panderer, so outraged and horrified by the past and she wants you to feel what she feels. I don't. I accept how this came about and give thanks. I would suggest Tom, instead of reading my words to attack and critique, that you 'accept' I responded to your provocation. By the way, homophobe leaves my lips very easily: irrational fear of, aversion to, or discrimination against homosexuality or homosexuals.
Comment: #5
Posted by: demecra zydeem
Sat Feb 11, 2012 7:56 AM
I will also add, it is very important to 'them' for our society to reproduce which is the major reason 'they' want to ban a woman's reproductive rights. They garner support and outrage from the masses by saying it's about religion, it's not! Or a column such as this, appealing to the 'independent's, the 'non-religious', the 'free-thinkers'. Brainwashing comes in all forms and this pandering to righteous outrage is just another form. If we don't reproduce, their game will be over. If every child is a wanted child, loved and raised by a family (male male, female female, male female. Love is love) they will no longer rule or control the thinking or the rights of individuals. Right now, gotta make more little taxpayers, gotta have kids to fill the schools, work the jobs, clean the toilets, etc. etc. ad nauseum. They pay couples in some countries to have children. Sick, isn't it? All these wonderful, unwanted kids without parents aren't recyclable. We can't give them to couples who want desperately to have a child. They are unwanted...but, they are the counted and there's not enough of them. Can't give them to those gwho want a child, they'll stop trying or paying for fertilization tx. Gotta take away birth control and abortion so we will always have a generation of servants/sheep (take your pick.) There will be another generation to keep the monster fed. Fear mongerer's keep you looking back so you don't see the monsters in our midst. This isn't about the Constitution or even politics. It's about control and who's going to be in control. More than that it's about fear. But, there's nothing to fear but fear itself. It has & will ruin a nation and a people.
Comment: #6
Posted by: demecra zydeem
Sat Feb 11, 2012 8:29 AM
Demecra - re read your last two posts and ask yourself if your are even coherent. A generation of sheep? When Obama dictates that Catholics have to adhere to HIS ( Obama's ) beliefs, you are OK with that? Nothing about your post speaks about the happiness of life and liberty, instead it is a litany of of past sins by people long dead. Are you sure you want to hang your hat on the supposed sins of others? I ask again, how do you stand with abortion and Sangers view of the Negroes and poor Catholics. You are right, it is all about control, and I will not be controlled by a brainless president or a brainless poster on any web site. How do you feel about your abortion heritage? Nothing else, because it is all smoke and mirrors after that question. Malkin speaks a certain truth, how do you defend that truth? You have already ruined a nation and a people by demanding too much of others. How do you justify demnanding more? Stand on your own two legs and get off the backs of others, that is the supine position Obame wants of you, and will later demand of you. Wale Up! No one is taking away yout precious right to kill fetuse, please admit that basic truth, or be a liberal liar such as ther are no death panels, we just call them Ethics boards. Liar, liar, liar, selfish and childish liar.
Comment: #7
Posted by: Tom
Sat Feb 11, 2012 5:21 PM
I have a friend who is a born again christian,born again at age 65 due to a vision while on drugs in a hospital.I asked him what he thought of abortion "its murder" he yelled at me.When i asked him a few minutes later what he would do about the Palestinians he replied in the same manner "kill them all"!The hypocrisy of his statementl was lost on him.I believe its the same with demecra zydeem arguing with Malkin or the Tom post,he'ss not going to get anywhere.Perhaps he just likes to joust with morons.
Comment: #8
Sun Feb 12, 2012 6:46 PM
We can reduce the multiplication of the unfit by ending non-White immigration into White countries. Does that sound harsh? Consider: nobody is sending non-Africans into Africa, giving them special rights and privileges, and trying to create a blended humanity there. Nobody is doing such things to China, Japan, or Islamic countries. But White countries? They are now supposed to be for everyone? And with the deliberate intent to create a blended humanity out of White people! It's genocide. It really is. This birth control topic is simply a red herring, a tempest in a teapot. Our population is being destroyed much more directly, while we are distracted by these petty social kinds of topics.
Comment: #9
Posted by: Exerces
Mon Feb 20, 2012 1:28 AM
Africa for the Africans,Asia for the Asians,white countries for EVERYBODY!

Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.

The Netherlands and Belgium are just as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.

Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.

What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?

How long would it take anyone to realize I'm not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?

And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn't object to this?

But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.
Comment: #10
Posted by: stevetrent
Mon Feb 20, 2012 1:02 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right: comments policy
Michelle Malkin
Feb. `16
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 1 2 3 4 5
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Star ParkerUpdated 10 Feb 2016
Brent Bozell
Betsy McCaughey
Betsy McCaugheyUpdated 10 Feb 2016

26 Apr 2011 Maxine Waters: Swamp Queen

8 Apr 2015 VA Reform: Another Obama "Success Story"

29 Jan 2010 Courtroom Cirque du Jihad