creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion General Opinion
Michael Barone
Michael Barone
29 Aug 2014
Obama's Segue From Constructive Tax Proposals to Low-Grade Demagoguery

"The tax system should be simplified and work for all Americans with lower individual and corporate tax rates … Read More.

26 Aug 2014
A Decent Lawyer Should Tell Liberals They're Damned Fools and Ought to Stop

"About half the practice of a decent lawyer consists in telling would-be clients that they are damned fools … Read More.

22 Aug 2014
Not Nearly as Daunting as the 1960s Riots

Continued violence in Ferguson, Missouri, brings back memories of the urban riots of the 1960s. As it happens,… Read More.

In Defense of Lobbyists

Comment

Barack Obama has long said that his campaign will not accept contributions from lobbyists, and now that he is the presumptive nominee, the Democratic National Committee won't accept them, either.

John McCain says that his campaign won't employ lobbyists, and volunteers are now queried about possible lobbying activity in the past. It's only a matter of time until someone calls for a law requiring every lobbyist to paint a big, red "L" on his forehead.

Behind this stigmatization of lobbyists is the notion that the failure to produce legislation in the public interest stems from the existence of lobbyists. Which is obviously nonsense. We couldn't abolish lobbying without repealing the First Amendment, which gives all of us, even those who are paid to do it, the right to "petition the government for a redress of grievances." And the government could not sensibly do business without lobbyists — as Hillary Clinton recognized at the YearlyKos convention last August.

While Obama and John Edwards were lambasting lobbyists, Clinton said: "You know, a lot of those lobbyists, whether you like it or not, represent real Americans. They actually do. They represent nurses. They represent, you know, social workers. They represent ... yes, they represent corporations. They employ a lot of people."

Lobbying is as American as apple pie, going back to colonial times. The Rev. Increase Mather lobbied in London for a new charter for Massachusetts. Benjamin Franklin was the colonial agent — lobbyist — for Pennsylvania and other colonies. When the federal government was created, lobbyists for varied interests naturally swarmed to the capital — first New York, then Philadelphia and Washington.

It is a simple fact of life that when Congress writes laws and the executive branch writes regulations that channel vast flows of money — and laws and regulations that have vast moral implications — citizens affected by those words are going to try to make sure they're written the way they want.

They're going to hire the best people they can find to do so. They want lobbyists with connections — and with expertise. They can help lawmakers understand how the words they write will affect "real Americans."

That's why I was pleased to see Clinton defend lobbying not only for those whom her Democratic audience considers good interests (nurses, social workers) but those they don't (corporations). Implicitly, she's rejecting the distinction made by the head of the Humane Society of the United States, who recently contrasted "special interest lobbyists" (presumably those working for profit-making interests) with "socially responsible lobbyists" (those working for nonprofits). But even lobbyists for nonprofits have a monetary motive: to keep their (often six-figure) salaries flowing in.

Yes, K Street is not perfect. Old entrenched interests tend to be well represented. New and growing industries and morally motivated constituencies that are unorganized tend to be underrepresented. The high-tech industry figured it could get along without much representation in Washington until Microsoft got slapped with an antitrust suit a decade ago. Now, it hires lobbyists in droves.

Not much of this will change in a McCain or Obama administration. The campaigns currently are embarrassing themselves by stigmatizing lobbyists. Obama's initial choice to head his vice presidential selection committee was Jim Johnson, who as CEO of Fannie Mae in the 1990s ran one of the most effective lobbying operations in town. McCain has had at his side through the campaign Charlie Black, who was a very successful lobbyist for more than 20 years.

More important, both candidates are proposing healthcare, carbon emission and tax changes — legislation that will, and should, face heavy lobbying. Which is fine: Such laws will have enormous ramifications, and everyone who wants to should chime in. Even — if I can use that dreaded word again — lobbyists.

To read more political analysis by Michael Barone, visit www.usnews.com/baroneblog. To find out more about Michael Barone, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.



Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment
What an idiot you are Barone. The issue is money, not lobbyists. Characterizing the controversy as one about those who are hired to advocate is just one more example of the abject intellectual destitution of prostitutes in the media like you who specialize in selling mediocrity. It's the money, stupid. You're getting enough of it yourself by doing the exact same thing to know that. Give me a breakdown of how much money is being collected by a lobbyist from each of his top 10 clients and I will tell you how much democracy is being auctioned off in the process.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Masako
Sat Jun 14, 2008 3:45 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Michael Barone
Aug. `14
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Authorís Podcast
Walter Williams
Walter E. WilliamsUpdated 3 Sep 2014
Mark Levy
Mark LevyUpdated 30 Aug 2014
Patrick Buchanan
Pat BuchananUpdated 29 Aug 2014

8 Oct 2009 Weak Himself, Obama Draws Strength From Bush

18 Feb 2013 For Dems to Win House, Obama Must Rise in Polls

26 Jul 2010 Some Welcome Signs of Life From Private Sector