creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion General Opinion
Michael Barone
Michael Barone
16 Feb 2012
A Failure of Imagination Put Metro on Wrong Track

Believers in central planning should take a look at Washington's Metro rail transit system. While they will … Read More.

13 Feb 2012
Romney Appeals to White Collars, Santorum to Blue

Rick Santorum won big victories in three small contests in the Republican presidential race last Tuesday. In … Read More.

9 Feb 2012
GOP Must Convince Young People It's the Party of Options

The Republican presidential candidates, except for Ron Paul, haven't been paying much attention to young … Read More.

Imagine Waugh Writing About the Christmas Bomber

Share Comment

In Evelyn Waugh's novel "Scoop," the best book on journalism ever written, Lord Copper, proprietor of the Daily Beast, is followed around by a flunkie who responds to every statement he makes. When Lord Copper says something that is true, the flunkie says, "Absolutely, Lord Copper." When he says something that is false, the flunkie says, "Up to a point, Lord Copper."

American politicians and public officials are not followed around by such aides. But the press and public opinion can and often do perform the function of Lord Copper's flunkie.

Such has been the case in the Obama administration's responses to the would-be Christmas bomber, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab.

On Dec. 27, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano went on the Sunday shows and said, "The system worked." The response was loud and unmistakable. Up to a point, Madame Secretary.

The next day, Barack Obama briefly interrupted his Hawaii vacation and, before hitting the links, referred to the "alleged" bomber as a "suspect" and "an isolated extremist." The response was less strident but plain. Up to a point, Mr. President.

In "Scoop," Lord Copper seems unflummoxed when his flunkie responds to his declaration that Tokyo is the capital of China, "Up to a point, Lord Copper." On the Christmas bomber, Obama and his appointees have shown themselves capable of learning, albeit slowly, from the responses of the public and the press.

Thus, late in the afternoon on Jan. 7, the 13th day after Christmas, in a twice-postponed press appearance, we heard the president, Napolitano and terrorism adviser John Brennan admit that the system didn't work and that the would-be bomber was not isolated and was a very specific and familiar kind of extremist.

Obama confessed "a failure to connect and understand the intelligence that we already had." And the president who has junked the term "war on terror" admitted: "We are at war. We are at war against al-Qaida, a far-reaching network of violence and hatred that attacked us on 9/11, that killed nearly 3,000 innocent people, and that is plotting to strike us again."

Absolutely, Mr.

President.

A chastened Secretary Napolitano acknowledged "systemic failure."

Absolutely, Madame Secretary.

The six-page summary of the White House review compiled by Brennan, rather than attacking the Bush administration's policies as Obama has so often done, noted that "the work by America's counterterrorism community has had many successes since 9/11." It confessed that analysts missed available "derogatory information" that should have put Abdulmutallab on the terrorist watch list and, astonishingly, that "a misspelling of Mr. Abdulmutallab's name resulted in the State Department not believing that he did not have a valid U.S. visa."

Absolutely, Mr. Brennan.

Left unaddressed by Obama, Napolitano and Brennan on Jan. 7 was the administration's almost instant decision to place Abdulmutallab in the criminal justice system, where he had a right to a lawyer who could advise him to remain silent, rather than keep him in military detention, as permitted by law. Abdulmutallab was talking to authorities when he was originally detained but, once provided with a lawyer, seems to have shut up.

That left the government unable to question him about what he did in Yemen, who recruited him, who had dispatched him on his mission and who trained him in the use of chemical explosives. We couldn't find out what he knows about paramilitary training facilities or the identities of the other terrorists who he reportedly said were ready to launch other attacks.

On a Jan. 3 Sunday talk show, Brennan, ignoring such considerations, said there was no downside in putting the terrorist in the criminal justice system.

Up to a point, Mr. Brennan.

It has been argued by no less a polemicist than Michael Kinsley that the decision was right because Abdulmutallab was in the United States. But it was not his intention to enter the United States (except as body parts), nor did Customs admit him legally to the country.

Not surprisingly, Obama has avoided this issue in public. On Jan. 7, he asserted that "the buck stops with me" and said, "As president, I have a solemn responsibility to protect our nation and our people."

Sounds good. But if you connect the dots, including the decision to give the Christmas bomber a lawyer and to allow him to clam up, the response has to be: Up to a point, Mr. President.

Michael Barone is senior political analyst for The Washington Examiner. To find out more about Michael Barone, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2010 THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM


Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment



Dear Michael Barone,

In your article titled "Waugh on Christmas bomber" published in the Californian January 11, 2010 some valid and concrete observations were made about the Christmas Bombing.
I personally agree that the majority of the statements made by Secretary Napolitano were ill advised and thought out, sort of like her alleged "systemic success" with Abdulmultallab.
Clearly the president cannot be held responsible for handling all of our counter-terrorist intel, but obviously the people that are occupied with this information have no idea what they are looking at. Obama says the "buck stops at him" but really whoever is calling the shots need to seriously consider a honorary resignation. However, nobody is willing to step up! within that entire intelligence community nobody could take responsibility or is willing to say that they made the mistake. From other news I have heard that zero resignations have been made and almost no one has been fired. If the buck stops with Obama, he needs to clean house and fast otherwise these intel "experts" will come running back to him after another imminent attack on US soil and expect him to take the fall. The lack of emotion and conviction during Obama's speech was a clear indicator of the necessity of apology to the American people concerning their safety, and a lack of evidence and sheer dumbfoundedness by the administration. Obama needs to consider a full re-briefing and removing some of those people from their computer's before another "systemic failure" results in somebody gets hurt. The question I am curious about is if the responsibility doesn't fall on the President, who does it fall on?

Thank you for your time and consideration I enjoy reading your articles,


Ben Thompson
Temecula California
30636 Del Rey Road 92591
benthompson8@yahoo.com
Comment: #1
Posted by: Ben Thompson
Mon Jan 11, 2010 5:43 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Michael Barone
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 27 Feb 2012
Deb Saunders
Debra J. SaundersUpdated 19 Feb 2012
Mark Levy
Mark LevyUpdated 18 Feb 2012

19 Nov 2009 Obama Bows, but the World Refuses to Bow Back

3 Apr 2007 Three Scenarios for '08

1 Feb 2010 Obama impresses 'educated class' but not terrorists