creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion General Opinion
Linda Chavez
Linda Chavez
22 Aug 2014
Fanning the Flames of Racial Tension

Words matter — and never more so than when race is involved. For more than a week, we have been … Read More.

8 Aug 2014
Medicare Solution

Next week I'm scheduled for a cervical spinal fusion that costs upward of $100,000, but I won't be paying for it.… Read More.

1 Aug 2014
Hamas' Propaganda Victory

The pictures are horrific: schoolroom walls covered in blood, parents running with injured children against a … Read More.

How to Fix the Housing Depression

Comment

As the president contemplates his options for creating jobs and stimulating the economy, here's one idea he should consider: Create a new immigration lottery that would let in up to a million newcomers — on the condition that they immediately purchase a home with cash.

I know this idea is bound to infuriate some people, but it could do more to stimulate the economy than anything the Obama administration — or the Republicans — have come up with so far. There's no question that the depressed housing market is a major factor stalling the economic recovery. Most Americans' wealth is tied up in their homes; housing prices have continued to fall precipitously, and largely because of the huge inventory of unsold houses. Many of those houses are foreclosures.

The Obama administration has tried a number of solutions to the problem, all of which have failed. Now they have a new idea that might help individuals who already own homes from losing them, but it won't do much to deal with the existing inventory of unsold homes. According to news reports, the administration is considering a plan that would allow all homeowners whose mortgages are guaranteed by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac to refinance at current interest rates.

Currently, more than $1.5 trillion in government-backed mortgages involve interest rates above 5 percent, when the current rate is about 4 percent. These higher interest rates cost homeowners hundreds of dollars in higher payments each month. But even if the plan were to be approved, it's only a partial solution — and one with some unintended consequences: possibly depressing the value of mortgage-backed securities, for example.

Increasing the country's population with affluent newcomers, however, would have few drawbacks and many benefits. First, it would stabilize home prices by drying up inventory, which would benefit every American who owns a home. Second, it would infuse the population with up to a million additional taxpayers, increasing government revenues. Third, it would help create new jobs, especially in construction, home renovation and ancillary sectors.

Since the mid-1980s, Canada has had a similar program in effect.

It lets in various categories of immigrants with high net worth who would either invest in existing businesses or start new ones that would employ Canadian workers. As a result, Canada has welcomed many job-creating entrepreneurs, mostly from Hong Kong and Taiwan, who have contributed enormously to Canada's relative economic health.

But what about the effect of such a program on the job prospects of unemployed Americans? One of the biggest anti-immigrant canards is that immigrants steal American jobs. In fact, immigrants create jobs. Studies consistently demonstrate that for every job an immigrant "takes" from someone who is native-born, more than one additional new job is created — to the benefit of everyone. The only downside is when immigrants also receive government transfers through participation in various welfare programs or through using government-provided services such as schools and health care.

But a program limited to affluent immigrants would not carry with it this disadvantage. In fact, depending on how it was structured, an immigrant lottery could alleviate these pressures by limiting the social services in which such entrepreneurial or investment-immigrants would be eligible to participate as they age.

There is no question that this approach to dealing with our current economic mess would be controversial. But the fact is that what we need now is real stimulus in the form of economic growth. And the one way to guarantee economic growth is to grow the population with affluent newcomers.

Millions of people worldwide want to come to the United States to experience our promise of political freedom and economic opportunity. Immigrants are a self-selected group of ambitious individuals who prosper because of their willingness to take risks and work hard. If we were to welcome not just the huddled masses yearning to breathe free but also the well-to-do individuals yearning to own an American home, we could help both the newcomers and ourselves.

It's an idea at least worth debating. It sure beats raising taxes or borrowing more money. The administration has exhausted its current options.

The housing depression is a drag on the entire economy. Until it's resolved, we won't see a full recovery. And I can't think of a better way to shed the current inventory of unsold homes than to let in people who can buy them with their own cash.

Linda Chavez is the author of "An Unlikely Conservative: The Transformation of an Ex-Liberal." To find out more about Linda Chavez, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2011 CREATORS.COM



Comments

0 Comments | Post Comment
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Linda Chavez
Aug. `14
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Authorís Podcast
Lawrence Kudlow
Lawrence KudlowUpdated 23 Aug 2014
Mark Levy
Mark LevyUpdated 23 Aug 2014
Brent Bozell

10 Jun 2011 Killing the Housing Market

1 Apr 2011 Unanswered Questions

28 Jan 2011 Why History Matters