creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion General Opinion
Linda Chavez
Linda Chavez
17 Feb 2012
Raiding Social Security

Extending the payroll tax cut — as the GOP leadership has now agreed with Democrats to do — may … Read More.

10 Feb 2012
Referendum on the Incumbent

Conventional wisdom suggests that the current refusal of the GOP base to accept Mitt Romney as the de facto … Read More.

3 Feb 2012
Feminists Are Anti-Choice

Horror of horrors! Lego has introduced a new line of gender-specific toys aimed at girls. I might not even … Read More.

Disenfranchising Citizens

Share Comment

If there's one thing Barack Obama learned back in his community organizing days, it was that numbers count. The more people you can claim to represent, the bigger your political base. So it should come as no surprise that the Obama administration sees the business of counting people as crucial to its political power. And that's why next year's decennial census is rife with opportunities for a major power grab by the president's party.

Every 10 years, the Census Bureau counts the number of people living in the United States; the Constitution mandates. Those figures are used for all sorts of things, from determining the amount of federal aid states and localities receive for certain programs to drawing legislative districts. The Census Bureau estimates that about $400 billion in federal money is distributed through census-count formulas. And of course, congressional seats depend on it. One geographic area's gain in population comes at another area's loss of political power since the number of seats in the House of Representatives is fixed at 435.

After the last Census, several states, including California and Texas, gained seats, but others, like Pennsylvania, lost them. There's nothing particularly nefarious about this — that is unless the numbers can be manipulated. And there's the rub. It's logical to assume that when it comes to counting people for the purpose of reapportioning congressional seats, the Census Bureau would be interested in making sure that the number of citizens living in congressional districts was roughly the same. After all, the whole idea of reapportionment is to assure that we don't end up with "rotten boroughs": districts that have lost voters but are still entitled to the same representation in our legislatures as districts that have more voters.

And that's where the Obama administration's plans for the Census become truly worrisome. The White House has made very clear that their intention is to put extra effort in counting illegal immigrants in the next Census. They want to make sure that all 12 million illegal immigrants are counted, a task that's not easy given the desire of most people illegal in the United States to avoid detection.

So the Census Bureau is teaming up with community organizations that can reach out to this population.

The bureau had contracted with ACORN to be part of the Census count, until that organization came under heavy criticism after two conservative activists videotaped ACORN workers giving tax advice to what they thought were a pimp and a prostitute. So the bureau has dropped plans to use ACORN but will be using other groups, including Hispanic and immigrant advocacy organizations and the Service Employees International Union.

The problem, of course, is that there is enormous potential for a census count that includes illegal immigrants to skew the political process. It will mean some congressional districts will include huge numbers of persons who aren't eligible to vote — and whose elected leaders therefore aren't really democratically accountable. It so happens that many of these districts will elect Democrats, since illegal immigrants often settle in poorer neighborhoods, whose legal residents and citizens tend to vote Democratic. So congressional Democrats and the White House are more than happy to see voting power shift to these new rotten boroughs.

This problem has been going on for decades — but it's gotten worse as the numbers of illegal immigrants has increased. But no previous administration has gone to the lengths that the Obama administration is planning to make sure that each and every illegal immigrant is counted next year. The decision to team up with advocacy groups and unions like the SEIU make clear that the intention is baldly political.

Estimates are that if illegal immigrants are counted in the 2010 census, California will keep two seats it would otherwise lose (since that state has been losing citizen residents at a rapid rate) and Arizona and Texas will each pick up seats. The big loser will be the Midwest, however, with a loss of six seats among five states, according to a study by the Connecticut State Data Center. But the real issue is what this will mean to individual voters in districts that are made up mostly of citizens. Their votes will, in effect, be diluted by the votes of citizens who live in districts where large numbers of illegal immigrants live.

This change has the potential to dramatically alter the meaning of representative democracy. If the Obama administration succeeds in counting 12 million illegal immigrants in next year's census, its impact will be to disenfranchise an equal number of U.S. citizens.

Linda Chavez is the author of "An Unlikely Conservative: The Transformation of an Ex-Liberal." To find out more about Linda Chavez, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2009 CREATORS.COM


Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment
Cavez's argument, and other like it, fudge over a very important point. Including illegal aliens and apportioning Representatives accordingly is exactly what the Constitution demands. Section 2 of the Fourteenth Amendment states it explicitly: "Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of PERSONS in each State, excluding Indians not taxed" (emphasis added). It does not exclude non-citizens and in fact forces them to be counted along with citizens.

There is no sneaky plot by the Democrats to grab more power. It is an attempt to comply with the demands of the Constitution. If Chavez and others are worried about how the Constitution supposedly skews power, then they should take it up with the Constitution, not Democrats who simply want to see the law followed. And before they pick on the supposed over-representation of areas with a given number of Representatives, they would also do well to remember that ALL states are guaranteed two Senators and at least one Representative. This arrangement in itself causes skews power inordinately toward smaller states versus bigger ones like California.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Timothy Griffy
Sat Oct 10, 2009 4:25 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Linda Chavez
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 27 Feb 2012
Mark Levy
Mark LevyUpdated 18 Feb 2012
Oliver North
Oliver NorthUpdated 17 Feb 2012

2 Apr 2010 The Party's Over for Steele

15 Jul 2011 Drop in Illegal Immigration Opens Door for Real Reform

17 Jul 2009 Of Race, Gender and Justice