creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion General Opinion
Joseph Farah
Joseph Farah
16 Jul 2014
Proof: Progressivism Is a Death Cult

I've chronicled my beef with the liberal church before. That's not the intent of this column. Instead, I'd … Read More.

9 Jul 2014
When Government Fails, It Wins

The Veterans Affairs ignores the health and medical needs of the people it was designed to serve. Solution? … Read More.

2 Jul 2014
Imagine America Without Obama

It's a question that's been asked many different ways over the years: —What would the world be like … Read More.

Repeat After Me: 'Impeachment Is a Distraction'

Comment

Relax. Keep your eyes on my timepiece. You are getting sleepy. Clear your mind and repeat after me: "Impeachment is a distraction. Impeachment is a distraction. Impeachment is a distraction."

It's like a mantra or the soothing words of a hypnotist. Maybe it's a word-association game being played by Republicans: "Impeachment" equals "distraction."

—"If somebody were to file impeachment proceedings — well, the fact is we know that's going nowhere in the Senate. And it's going to be a major, major distraction from actually getting results, which means rolling back some of his power relative to Congress." — Rep. Charles Boustany, R-La.

—"Does President Obama deserve to be sued or impeached? Yes! Is there a snowball's chance in hell that either the lawsuit or an impeachment will succeed? No! Why not sue Barack Obama then or impeach him? For the simplest of all reasons: Neither of these actions is going to do anything to stop Obama, or even discredit him — and both can create a distraction that draws attention away from the Democrats' disasters during an election year." — Thomas Sowell

—"I'm glad to see House Republicans are challenging him (Barack Obama), at least legally, at this point, but I think that (impeachment) gets to be a bit of a distraction, just like the impeachment of Bill Clinton did." — Dick Cheney

I'm not one for censorship, but if there is ever a movement to ban the word "distraction" from the English language, count me in for support.

Impeachment is not a distraction; it's the serious business of the Constitution of the United States. It's a duty. It's a sober responsibility. It's the moral and legal consequence of high crimes and misdemeanors committed by an out-of-control, rogue president. It's cowardice to make excuses whether a conviction is politically likely or not.

Some Republicans are in hopeless denial, like House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte, R-Va.: "We are not working on or drawing up articles of impeachment. The Constitution is very clear as to what constitutes grounds for impeachment of the president of the United States. He has not committed the kind of criminal acts that call for that."

This is what the Constitution says about impeachment: "The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors." Does Goodlatte actually believe President Barack Obama is not guilty of even a political misdemeanor? Where has he been for the last five years? Perhaps he's spending too much time in Washington.

By the way, is he also aware the Constitution gives the Republican-controlled House of Representatives sole authority to impeach? "The House of Representatives shall choose their speaker and other officers; and shall have the sole power of impeachment."

Rep.

Tim Huelskamp, R-Kan., sees impeachment purely in terms of political expedience. He says it could alienate independent voters who "right now are leaning our way. If you want to help the Democrats keep control of the Senate, this would be one way to do it."

I agree, for once, with "The Daily Show" host Jon Stewart, who mocked Republican lawmakers for accusing Obama of tyranny and worse, but then doing nothing about it.

"That's how you know all this talk of tyranny is bull——," he said. "When your main concern when you're deposing a tyrant is how it will affect your party's chances in the upcoming midterm elections, that's not tyranny."

Even some self-proclaimed tea party leaders are falling in line with Republican cowardice. Taylor Budowich, executive director of the Tea Party Express PAC in California, says an attempt to impeach the president would be misguided and potentially damaging to the conservative movement heading into the fall midterms.

"While conservatives may have some legitimate legal grievances with President Obama's actions, American voters, by and large, do not feel President Obama deserves to be impeached," he said. "The priorities for the majority of voters are to rein in out-of-control spending and get the economy working again. Impeachment is a distraction."

There's that D-word, again. Distraction from what?

What are Republicans doing about reining in out-of-control spending and getting the economy working again?

Didn't Republicans in the House give Obama a blank checkbook every time they raised the debt limit over the last five years?

I'd really like to know what it is Republicans are being "distracted" from doing by talk of impeachment.

I would suggest to you that focusing on anything but impeaching this president is a distraction from solving our nation's problems.

To find out more about Joseph Farah and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2014 CREATORS.COM



Comments

4 Comments | Post Comment
Joseph who is delusional said:

Does Goodlatte actually believe President Barack Obama is not guilty of even a political misdemeanor? Where has he been for the last five years? Perhaps he's spending too much time in Washington.

no, he's just honest, obviously he'll get punished by the GOP for that. The President is a constitutional law professor, do you think he would knowingly or mistakenly commit a high crime or misdemeanor? Being black and moderately liberal is not a crime, regardless of how much you would like it to be. Obama was elected twice and he is fulfilling his mandate, despite the do nothing obstructionists in the GOP. He is using his legal power to issue executive orders to get his job done serving the people. He has signed far less EO's than the last 7 POTUS.The GOP are jumping up and down and screaming IMPEACHMENT, off with his head, it only shows how debased the GOP is. He is not breaking any laws and you know it, that's why they haven't filed for impeachment or sued him, they know it will go nowhere, it's an election year, what better way to misrepresent Obama then to run around screaming impeachment. Get rid of gerrymandering and see how many more Dems make it into Congress, right now it's fixed.
Comment: #1
Posted by: alohaLise
Tue Jul 22, 2014 1:38 PM
"Didn't Republicans in the House give Obama a blank checkbook every time they raised the debt limit over the last five years?"

Before you declare yourself a "pundit," why don't you learn the definition of debt limit? You're an imbecile. By raising the debt ceiling, Congress is not deciding to spend more, as anyone with even a basic understanding of politics and the economy can grasp. It's so the government does not have to default on its debt or cut programs that are vital to this country.

Who in their right mind would give you a platform to voice your thoughts? You're a bigoted idiot. No one cares what you have to say and your website is a sad excuse for political commentary.
Comment: #2
Posted by: h.b.
Tue Jul 22, 2014 4:11 PM
Of course a raising of the debt ceiling is a blank check to spend more. If more was not "needed", the ceiling would be fine as is. It is an admission that they plan to overspend the existing limit!
Comment: #3
Posted by: partsmom
Wed Jul 23, 2014 10:47 AM
Re: partsmom you need to look up what the debt ceiling is. it does not mean more spending. it means that it allows us to wait to pay back some of our debt so we don't default on it. leave it to republicans to spread incorrect information. and leave it to the uninformed public, like yourself, to believe these lies. read a book.
Comment: #4
Posted by: h.b.
Fri Jul 25, 2014 12:16 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Joseph Farah
Jul. `14
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Authorís Podcast
Lawrence Kudlow
Lawrence KudlowUpdated 26 Jul 2014
Mark Levy
Mark LevyUpdated 26 Jul 2014
Brent Bozell

12 Dec 2007 What Will You Do If They Shoot Up Your Church?

21 Apr 2010 Obama's Born-in-USA Mandate

25 Jul 2007 Between the Lines: Why We 'Lost' Iraq