creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion General Opinion
diane dimond
Diane Dimond
12 May 2012
Happy Mother's Day -- If You Aren't Locked Up

Happy Mother's Day to all the other moms out there! Your children have likely bought you a nice card and a gift,… Read More.

5 May 2012
Faith in America Redux

Sometimes a columnist writes something that grabs people by the throat. I guess I accomplished that last week … Read More.

28 Apr 2012
A Crisis of Justice

"With liberty and justice for all ..." are the last six words of our Pledge of Allegiance. I'm just … Read More.

Cop in the Sky

Share Comment

Here's a brand new crime-fighting idea that's either crazy or some kind of brilliant. It's the brainchild of a 63-year-old disabled inventor named Bill Tomsick of Cape Coral, Fla.

Bill worked as a newspaper pressman for the Cleveland Press for many years. In 1980, after a round of downsizing at the paper, he moved on to open a popular and highly successful Cleveland nightclub called The Band Box. Life dealt Bill a raw deal 11 years later, when a routine chore at the club caused a back injury that left him paralyzed from the waist down.

That's when Bill moved to Florida and started inventing things: a foot care item for the disabled and a safety device for pontoon boats, among other things. And that's when his creative mind began to formulate what today has become a highly intriguing idea about how to fight crime. It dovetails nicely with President Obama's recent declaration that the U.S. combat operations in Iraq are officially over.

Tomsick's proposal is to get some of those highly sophisticated U.S. military (and NASA) satellites repositioned so instead of finding enemy combatants in Iraq they can be put to use finding criminals here at home.

Bill describes himself as a product of the space age. He grew up in the heady atmosphere of President Kennedy's challenge to NASA to put a man on the moon — and he watched like so many of the rest of us as the nation achieved that goal.

"Since the 1960s, NASA and our military have developed and perfected technology to take real-time, high-resolution, low-light, bad-weather photographs from satellites and send them back to Earth within minutes," Tomsick says. These images — powerful enough to capture the detail on an enemy soldier's clothing or the numbers on a car license plate — help our military to react within mere minutes to eradicate threats.

Why then, Bill Tomsick asks, can't we lasso that technology to help stop criminals dead in their tracks? "Using this technology, it would allow police to zoom in on any crime scene and follow the perpetrators to wherever they are in real time. They could rescue the victim and solve the crime ... within minutes!" All it would take is close cooperation between our military and law enforcement agencies.

For 50 years our government has been working to advance this satellite technology, and Tomsick believes it has developed to the point that with a quick response from police the NASA or military satellite operators could simply punch in GPS coordinates, roll back the videotape from the crime scene and obtain a bird's-eye view as a kidnapper abducts a child, a robber flees from a bank or a car thief drives away from the scene.

Need I add what a bonus such precise satellite surveillance would be along our porous borders?

"The hardware is already up there; the cost would be minimal," Bill says. In fact, by his accounting, if America could begin to think outside the crime-fighting box and adopted this eye-in-the-sky idea, we could realize an annual, collective saving of multiple billions of dollars in search costs, police investigation, and overtime and court costs for lengthy trials.

"That search for that missing (California) woman, Lacy Peterson, cost multiple millions of dollars ... and the trial for her husband Scott cost millions more. If he'd been tracked by a satellite dumping her body, we could have saved all that money," Tomsick concludes. And think of all the years of pain her family would have been spared, as well.

The possibility of turning instruments of international war into tools for our domestic war on crime sounds like a great proposal to explore. His following on his Facebook site (2findthemissing) and his rudimentary Website (findthemissing.vze.com) continue to pick up followers. But Tomsick says his yearlong letter-writing effort to get members of Congress and President Obama interested had netted exactly no response. He says he's written to nearly every single member of the United States Senate and House. He even wrote an impassioned letter to first lady Michelle Obama. Not one representative of our government has bothered to answer. Bill tells me he longs for the day when a president boldly dares Americans to face a problem and band together to solve it, much like JFK did back in the '60s.

"The politicians are probably worried about the privacy thing," Bill told me when we spoke on the phone the other day. And sure as you are reading this, there would likely be legal challenges to the idea from those like the American Civil Liberties Union that would see satellite surveillance as an intrusion. I'm hard-pressed to see what privacy we'd lose given that surveillance is already so widespread.

"I don't get that," Bill said. "Privacy matters will have to be addressed. But we already have cameras on many street corners and in most stores. Wouldn't you give up some privacy to ensure you're safer," he asked me.

Yeah, Bill, I think I would. If it would catch a murderer or a child's kidnapper — yeah, I would.

Diane Dimond's new book, "Cirque Du Salahi — Be Careful Who You Trust," can be pre-ordered at Amazon.com. Visit Diane Dimond's official website at www.dianedimond.com for investigative reporting, polls and more. To find out more about Diane Dimond and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM


Comments

2 Comments | Post Comment
And, there is a guarantee that only criminals will be targeted. /sarc
Comment: #1
Posted by: David Henricks
Sat Sep 11, 2010 1:27 AM
"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety deserve neither Liberty nor Safety" Ben Franklin
Comment: #2
Posted by: Keith John Sampson
Mon Sep 13, 2010 5:32 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Diane Dimond
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Oliver North
Oliver NorthUpdated 25 May 2012
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 25 May 2012
David Limbaugh
David LimbaughUpdated 25 May 2012

18 Sep 2010 Stolen Futures

20 Mar 2010 Crime on the Health Care Front

16 Jan 2010 Law That's Really on Your Side