creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion General Opinion
Deb Saunders
Debra J. Saunders
24 May 2012
In the House, Is 80 Over the Hill?

When Sen. Richard Lugar, R-Ind., lost the GOP primary to challenger Richard Mourdock this month, Beltway … Read More.

22 May 2012
Democrats' War on Money

Cory Booker, mayor of Newark, N.J., came across as a moderate, sensible Democrat when he said on "Meet … Read More.

20 May 2012
FTC vs. Skechers: Overhyped Meets Overkill

The Federal Trade Commission announced Wednesday that Skechers USA Inc. will pay $40 million to settle … Read More.

The Palin-Biden Verdict

Share Comment

She passed.

He passed.

Palin fared better going against Joe Biden than Katie Couric.

Sure, she had moments when she seemed to be working too hard trying to remember what she was supposed to say so she awkwardly regurgitated a string of campaign buzzwords. Who cares? She didn't crash. And she showed Americans a candidate who does not speak Beltway-speak.

Democrats used to crow about that common touch with Bubba. Well, meet Bubbette.

Biden showed more fluency on foreign policy, to be sure. You know he would do a better job on a pop quiz on Israeli-Palestinian relations. When he talked plain, however — as when he hit the McCain $5,000-per-family health care tax credit — Biden scored.

But Biden also stumbled when he too theatrically stifled laughter at Palin's answer to moderator Gwen Ifill's question about executive authority. "Do you believe as Vice President Cheney does, that the executive branch does not hold complete sway over the office of the vice presidency, that it is also a member of the legislative branch?" Ifill asked.

Palin clearly did not understand that the question was a swipe at Cheney's assertion that his office did not need to comply with national security disclosure rules required of other executive branch agencies. And she gave a school-kid stalling answer to the question.

That said, Biden's theatrics were, well, undisciplined. Arrogant even.

Some Americans tuned into the debate to find out whether Palin could go toe to toe with Vladimir Putin. The answer, I think, is that she would know how to take advantage of being underestimated. (I can hear her now: "Can I call you Vladimir?" Okey dokey.)

Thus Biden felt safe to claim, "With regard to Iraq, I indicated it would be a mistake to — I gave the president the power.

I voted for the power because he said he needed it not to go to war but to keep the United States, the U.N. in line, to keep sanctions on Iraq and not let them be lifted."

If Biden is so smart and savvy and experienced, how could he have been so stupid about his war vote?

"Oh, yeah, it's so obvious I'm a Washington outsider," Palin countered, "and someone just not used to the way you guys operate. Because here you voted for the war and now you oppose the war."

Palin's other job was to show America that she is not an intolerant right-wing kook. And she did so deftly on the issue of expanding benefits to same-sex couples, as Alaska does.

"Well, not if it goes closer and closer towards redefining the traditional definition of marriage between one man and one woman," she answered.

But: "I also want to clarify, if there's any kind of suggestion at all from my answer that I would be anything but tolerant of adults in America choosing their partners, choosing relationships that they deem best for themselves, you know, I am tolerant and I have a very diverse family and group of friends and even within that group you would see some who may not agree with me on this issue, some very dear friends who don't agree with me on this issue."

Camp McCain can breathe a sigh of relief. But first, campaign staffers should kick themselves for over-handling the Alaska governor.

Then McCain better get to work shaming Congress for larding the bailout bill with all that pork and working to get both houses to pass a bill that revokes the extra spending heaped onto this shameful package.

It's too bad Palin didn't hit Biden harder for being part of the big-spending Washington culture that can't get difficult things done, but sure knows how to spend money it doesn't have. But there will be no shortages of opportunities for both McCain and Palin to do so in the future.

E-mail Debra J. Saunders at dsaunders@sfchronicle.com. To find out more about Debra J. Saunders, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.


Comments

2 Comments | Post Comment
Wrong again, Saunders. We can always count on you for that. Palin understood Ifill's question about the vice presidency perfectly well. What she just couldn't do was answer intelligently. And isn't it just soooo fashionable to try to pass off that gibberish as some kind of principled rejection of "Beltway speak."

The fact of the matter is that all of Ifill's questions were home run pitches for exactly the kind of simplistic, meaningless phrases Palin seems to have in such inexhaustible supply. She does have an effective public presence, no doubt about it, if you are appealing to a mentality that doesn't rise above the level of a high schooler. All she needed was to stick to the talking points drilled into her by the McCain handlers and not overuse the option of just refusing to answer the question.

Her odds of success were further guaranteed by the McCain's campaign's whining in advance about how Ifill, who is utterly pristine in her professionalism and objective journalism, would give Biden an unfair advantage because of alleged bias in favor of Obama. Of course she didn't, and now all of you babbling messengers of mediocrity are just dizzy with relief that Saturday Night Live will have to look elsewhere for material. At least this week.

One way to sum up the battle between the two campaigns as being all about the word "nuclear." Palin made sure she mispronounced it in good old Ronald Reagan, screw-the-intellectuals-and-all-they-stand-for fashion, just as McCain does, and that is still the acid test for a modern Republican candidate. Biden stuck to what he learned in school (you know...the place where we get what they call "education") as the proper way to sound out English and pronounced it correctly.

It's all about the subliminal message tied up in how the candidates say that one little word, isn't it Saunders?
Comment: #1
Posted by: Masako
Sat Oct 4, 2008 10:52 AM
Well my dear...it is a shame your column was directly below Mr. Martin's on "No Tolerance For Mediocrity" in USA TODAY because you clearly understand what is it. Lets "dumb down" Americans a little bit more! I don't want a down home gotcha babe in the Whitehouse. What a slap in the face to all of us that fought for equal rights and empowerment of women in the work place long before you were ever writing! You are where you are because of those of us that went before to pave the way...and in my own down home way...Don't you forget it! Palin is an embarassment to all intelligent hard working women whether it be at home or in the business world.
She faked her way through the debate and the media that thought she did so "wonderfully" well must have all gone to the same school of stupidness.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Linda
Tue Oct 7, 2008 9:44 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Debra J. Saunders
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Oliver North
Oliver NorthUpdated 25 May 2012
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 25 May 2012
David Limbaugh
David LimbaughUpdated 25 May 2012

27 Aug 2008 The Middle Convention and the Under Convention

20 Jul 2008 The Uncensored Jesse Jackson

23 Oct 2008 Go-cart, No Brakes