creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion General Opinion
Deb Saunders
Debra J. Saunders
24 Apr 2014
Cruder Than Alberta Tar Sands

According to experts cited by The New York Times, President Barack Obama's eventual decision on the Keystone … Read More.

22 Apr 2014
Overdue Mercy for Low-Level Drug Offenders

When Barack Obama ran for the White House in 2008, federal inmates and their families believed that if he won,… Read More.

20 Apr 2014
I See Rich People

In the "Star Trek" movies, San Francisco serves as headquarters of Starfleet Command. This cracks me up to no end,… Read More.

Brown at the Brink

Comment

Gov. Jerry Brown's strategy to win the governor's seat has led California to this moment.

March 10 was Brown's self-imposed deadline for passing his budget package and placing a $14 billion tax-increase extension on a June special-election ballot. Late Wednesday, Brown wisely asked the Legislature to delay a budget vote.

As a gubernatorial candidate, Brown would not say he planned on raising taxes — only that he would not raise taxes without voter approval. He must have known that he would follow the course he had set, but he also knew that 65 percent of California voters had rejected a similar tax package in 2009. So he was coy. And he won the election.

The day after Brown beat Republican Meg Whitman, he told reporters that he was very aware of the voters' rejection of Proposition 21 — with nearly 60 percent of voters turning down an $18 surcharge to fund state parks.

"I would say that the electorate is in no mood to add to their burdens," he observed.

Clearly, Brown has used his victory to pull off a stunning feat of jujitsu. Four months after he recognized voters' refusal to pay $18 for parks, Brown has all eyes and daggers trained on Republican curs who either refuse to support Brown's tax measure or have not agreed to cut a deal.

The Republicans have their reasons: GOP voters oppose tax increases. Voters of both parties rejected the 2009 version of Plan Brown. And, GOP stalwart Jon Fleischman warns, Republicans who compromise can expect no mercy from Democratic opponents in 2012.

In 2009, Republican Abel Maldonado supported a tax compromise. In 2010, his opponent in the lieutenant governor's race, Democrat Gavin Newsom, hit him for supporting "the biggest tax increase in California history."

Eventually, I believe, at least two Assembly and two Senate Repubs will vote for Plan Brown.

The adults in Sacramento understand that California needs clarity. With this measure, Brown has thrown down the gauntlet: If Californians want this level of government, they will have to pay for it.

Observe that a January Public Policy Institute of California poll found that 54 percent of likely voters support the Brown tax package. That's a very skinny margin. It's one thing to say you support higher taxes; it's another to vote for them.

Brown and the Democrats have to cut a deal that includes a spending cap and pension reforms — not just to win the votes of GOP pragmatists, but also because if they don't, voters are likely to reject the governor's tax-increase plan.

Or do Brown and the Dems think that Brown is so beloved that he can get Californians to agree to tax increases they once rejected — without reforms sought by five hardy GOP senators who have been meeting with Brown?

What happens if Brown's brinkmanship fails?

Brown told the Legislature that if voters reject his tax package, he will pass an all-cuts budget. Tactical error. Many conservatives responded: Go ahead, make my day.

As for Sacto Dems and unions, if voters reject Plan Brown, I doubt they'll share Brown's "loyalty to California." More likely, they will demand a debt-expanding cross-your-fingers-and-pray-for-a-recovery gimmicky scheme — and they'll get it.

Arnold Schwarzenegger knows the downside of brinkmanship. He knows how Sacramento treats a governor once he's lost his ballot measures. And it's not pretty.

E-mail Debra J. Saunders at dsaunders@sfchronicle.com. To find out more about Debra J. Saunders, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2011 CREATORS.COM



Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment
The difference is that this time the Governor is being honest about what kind of government we see with taxes and without taxes. Voters get to choose with something resembling real information.

And, by the way, it may have been "coy" of him to say he would not raise taxes without voter approval, but that is not what made the difference in the election. Witman basically ran one of the most incompetent gubernatorial campaigns in California's history, and she never had a prayer.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Masako
Wed Mar 9, 2011 9:08 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Debra J. Saunders
Apr. `14
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
30 31 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Authorís Podcast
Mona Charen
Mona CharenUpdated 25 Apr 2014
David Limbaugh
David LimbaughUpdated 25 Apr 2014
Deb Saunders
Debra J. SaundersUpdated 24 Apr 2014

30 Sep 2007 Why Gingrich Should Stifle the Urge

17 Jan 2008 Old Warrior, Go Home

25 Jan 2007 DEBRA J. SAUNDERS