creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion General Opinion
David Limbaugh
David Limbaugh
14 May 2013
Partisan Obama Culture Spawned a More Abusive IRS

In case you're hiding under a rock, you should know that an audit conducted by the inspector general for the … Read More.

10 May 2013
There's Way Too Much Administration Smoke on Benghazi

A former National Security Council spokesman, Tommy Vietor, is representative of the arrogance of the Obama … Read More.

7 May 2013
The Most Incorrigibly Political and America-bashing President

President Barack Obama has to be the most partisan and most ideological president we've seen in a long, long time.… Read More.

Trouble Brewing in GOP

Comment

For the first time, I am wondering about the long-term viability of the Republican Party. I say this not as an advocate of its demise or restructuring but as an observer of troubling signs.

The Republican Party is thought to be the institutional vehicle for the advancement of conservative policies, but for decades, the conservative movement has been frustrated with the party's deviation from conservative principles — its refusal to live up to its decidedly conservative platform.

I believe that the disappointing results for Republicans in the 2006 elections and probably the 2012 elections, as well, were in no small part attributable to frustrated conservatives staying at home.

The thinking among many conservatives has been that the party has consistently fallen short by failing to restrain the growth of the ever-expanding federal government and by failing to nominate sufficiently conservative presidential nominees. That is, if we would just nominate and elect Reagan conservatives and govern on Reagan principles, we would recapture majority status in no time.

The main opposing view — call it the establishment view — holds that Republicans need to accept that the reign of small government is over, get with the program and devise policies to make the irreversibly enormous government smarter and more energetic. In other words, Republicans need to surrender to the notion that liberalism's concept of government has won and rejigger their agenda toward taming the leviathan rather than shrinking it.

I'd feel better if the ongoing competition between Reagan conservatives and establishment Republicans were the only big fissure in the GOP right now, but there are other cracks that threaten to break wide open, too. Our problems transcend our differing approaches to the size and scope of government and to fiscal and other economic issues.

Reagan conservatism is no longer under attack from just establishment Republicans; it's also under attack from many inside the conservative movement itself. Reagan conservatism is a three-legged stool of fiscal, foreign policy and social issues conservatism. But today many libertarian-oriented conservatives are singing from the liberal libertine hymnal that the GOP needs to remake its image as more inclusive, more tolerant, less judgmental and less strident. In other words, it needs to lighten up and quit opposing gay marriage, at least soften its position on abortion, and get on board the amnesty train to legalize illegal immigrants. I won't even get into troubling foreign policy divisions among so-called neocons, so-called isolationists and those who simply believe we should conduct our foreign policy based foremost on promoting our strategic national interests.

One might reasonably assume that President Obama's abysmal record would usher in an era of GOP unity, but ironically, his policies have put such a strain on America that they seem to be exacerbating, rather than alleviating, the divisions within the GOP.

I see my more libertarian-oriented conservative friends on Twitter, for example, wholly frustrated with conservatives who refuse to surrender on the social issues and thereby, in their view, jeopardize a coalition that could successfully oppose Obama's bankrupting of America. It's as if they believe that all social conservatives have morphed into Todd Akin.

Maybe it's just from where I'm sitting, but it appears to me that momentum is building among Republicans to capitulate on the issue of same-sex marriage, no matter what negative consequences might result from society's abandonment of support for traditional marriage. Likewise, it seems that many Republicans are determined to surrender on the immigration issue on the naive hope that Republicans will instantly shed the ogre factor and be on equal footing to compete for the Hispanic vote.

I belong to the school that believes the Republican Party must remain the party of mainstream Reagan conservatism rather than try to become a diluted version of the Democratic Party. This does not mean Republicans can't come up with creative policy solutions when advisable, but it does mean that conservatism is based on timeless principles that require no major revisions. Conservatives are champions of freedom, the rule of law and enforcement of the social compact between government and the people enshrined in the Constitution, which imposes limitations on government in order to maximize our liberties. If we reject these ideas, then we have turned our backs on what America means and what has made America unique. What's the point of winning elections if the price is American exceptionalism?

I refuse to acquiesce to the cowardly notion that conservatives are intolerant or mean-spirited because they oppose discriminant treatment for groups and classes of people, because they support the rule of law, because they oppose a runaway entitlement state and because they adhere to traditional values, including the protection of innocent life.

But my personal preferences as to the future of the conservative movement and the GOP aren't really the point. The point is that no matter what I prefer, the hard truth is that the movement inside the Republican Party to abandon social conservatism is nothing short of a political death wish. Denying it will not alter the reality.

David Limbaugh is a writer, author and attorney. His latest book, "The Great Destroyer," reached No. 2 on the New York Times best-seller list for nonfiction for its first two weeks. Follow him on Twitter @davidlimbaugh and his website at www.davidlimbaugh.com. To read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2013 CREATORS.COM



Comments

3 Comments | Post Comment
Sir;... I really believe you have framed the problem wrongly... Stiring a shetpot is not brewing coffee...The republican party has been the mouthpiece of conservatism, and a chainsaw for government too small to serve those most in need of government; Yet all this was but a front for an aggressive internationalism that cost a lot of money, ultimately denied this society taxes, and saw the export of our jobs and capital in an avalanche of capital in search of cheap, or slave labor...
Regardless; you cannot capitalize the world without decapitalizing your own land, and this act of internationalism meant to make empire has only hastened our domestic decline... Our internationalism supported equally by both parties, but made possible primarily by the pro-business prejudice and nationalism of the right has been the cause of our decline as a nation, and the fragility of our economy... So; what is it y'all want???
More of republican medicine will kill us... Treating the poor offcasts of capitalists success is breaking the population, and they are not going to go away, and they cannot possibly assume the debt run up for senseless displays of raw military power... If the poor could support themselves with labor, they would do so... They cannot find even the most menial or meaningless occupations... The government cannot afford to fund them doing nothing, and if it should attempt to fund them doing something worthwhile, some private concern would demand to do so at a profit, and with half the people...
What does the republican party propose to do with all the illegals and legal aliens invited in to this land as a boon to profits??? What do they intend to do about global warming but deny it??? What do they intend to offer those struck by disasters except the evidence of a government too poor, and too powerless to help itself??? What do they intend to do with the armies of unemployed, who have played by the rules, acted as individuals, never engaged in collective bargaining, never demanded the rights of a human being once -who are now shiftless, dispossessed, and desparate??? What do they intend to do with the world republicanism has created for us all, where the enmity of billions is turned against us, and can no longer be contained, when we have not the money to even consider resistence???...
It is good to see the sniveling, sniping, backbiting, scab picking exercise of republican self criticism... The democrats as a party have had no unity as the republicans have... The democrats have been the party of loose ends, and everybody else... There is always more unity in a negative purpose than in a positive purpose... Good has many faces and expressions while evil has but one...What the republicans have managed for years is a policy that appealed to many, to small businessman, to farmers, to whites, to evangelicals, to middle class, and naturally, to the rich... Regardless of policy, only the rich have been served in practice... The tax revolt of the farmers and middle class served the rich; but served them not at all, and was for most only a false economy... You can deny education today, and pay the price tomorrow in more prisons and prisoners, and in higher costs for educating your own children to a respectable standard... You can deny infrastructure today, and when it is falling around your ears and business is rumbling out of town in search of new, you can see the damage done when it is too late to fix it...
Everything government should be and do, republicans have denied...The churches support the greatest immorality that denies to all their rights, and sees the theft of citizens lives and livelyhoods, of their commonwelath; and then feels hurt when government allows ubiquitous immorality that is always the bed mate of poverty... What they have encouraged is a blind and ignorant policy that regarded individual knowledge as a threat, and social knowledge as treason... They have bought the idea of America as a world cop without selling how to pay for it...Now that they are finding no money in it, many are ready for retreat...
You can call for larger government or smaller...The terms are meaningless, and can only be sold to the ignorant on the basis of stupidity... The proper size of government is the proper size, and it will some times grow of necessity, and some times shrink... If you do not like some aspect of government, like pollution regulations, then you can get enough of the dense to follow you into permitting their own poisoning... Why should intelligent people be governed by the ignorant??? If enough people say such regulations are necessary, and big business cannot prove otherwise, they sabotage those regulations by escaping from them abroad, or by starving government of the funds necessary to enforce law...The whole nature of the republican party for many decades has been one of subversion of our aims, and our will, and the perversion of policy based upon catch words like: less government...
As Santayana pointed out: When there was a general consensus as to the goals of the society, government was carried on in anonyminity... We only have to be so on top of the situation today because as a practical point society is not working for anyone... The republicans have thrown a monkey wrench in the works...The democrats who need for government to work must make it work over the resistence of a sizable minority of hard core, last stand republicans...And it is this essentially nagative, and pessimistic view of government, of democracy, and humanity that republicans suffering so to repackage... On Christmas day, when the people have to open a beautifully packaged pile of crap, you cannot expect they will not notice they have been hurt, had and dissed...
The problem for the democrats in making the government work for the people is still harder than the task the republicans have before them... Democratic failure is republican success without so much as a lifting of a finger...The democrats do not have the money to advertize their desires let alone to fund the government... They should point out all the many billionaires too poor to pay taxes who have plenty to fund elections...The people may have noticed the perversion of their democracy has gone right while their poverty has come left... And if people do not have the means through government to achieve justice which is also equality and wealth, then they must get their justice in the streets and through their own actions...The spectacle of a people taking revenge with interest for justice long denied can be seen through the rheumic eyes of history, and it is nightmare...
The republicans used to be on the right side of history, but only for a moment... Now, the only good that can come out of them is the total destruction of the government based upon the long encouraged resentment of farmers, evangelicals and middle class, and this resentment has been the pet of the rich, baited by bad government in republican hands, and fed by the high taxes failing government inevitably demands... Since the democrats have followed essentially the same economic ideology as the republicans to the brink; they have little claim to leadership... All they can do is govern, and if possible, govern alone...With success, they will have enough of money to do what needs doing; but if they cannot find the will and power to tax the rich, they may as well destroy the government as the republican party would, and set the people on the trail of their stolen commonwealth... I would prefer revolution while I am still young enough to enjoy it, but we will only have it when the republicans offer the people no alternative...
Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #1
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Tue Mar 19, 2013 6:17 AM
I also see no political solution to the GOP's dilemma, but I vote for a death with dignity. I appeal to those Republicans who would sacrifice principles for power to please just join the party that has already done so, and leave the GOP to die in peace.
Comment: #2
Posted by: cathy jones
Tue Mar 19, 2013 9:49 AM
Re: cathy jones;... Principals are the problem... Governments, societies, economies, religions are all forms of relationship which should be dynamic and fluid, always flexible and able to adapt to changing circumstances and new problems... Ideals, forms, principals are all ideas people form as abstractions of reality, and they are not better than reality, or more true... So what if we base our social forms off of principals or moral forms we hold dear and think true??? We still need to make human reality work with, and for the human beings- who are alive today, and hopefully in this way add to the survival potential of future generations...
I don't care what kind of gold plated principals I take from the past... I don't care how much days passed worshipped their vaunted principals, because if they led to our discord, our discord is my reality, and the problem is always that people who are true to their principals, are untrue to humanity...
We have suffered the tyranny of ideas in the past century...Nazis and Communists alike were willing to kill human being to feed to their principals... Not one of those people was willing to suggest a little slower progress and a little more sensitivity to human needs... They simply presumed their principals were correct as they steam rolled millions under their wheels...
Enough is enough... If enough people have suffered and died to feed the economy... If enough people have went to war, and suffered ignorance, poverty, disease dispare to keep the economy working, or the political system malfunctioning then the principals are the problem and not the people, and the people are the solution, and not the problem...
Would you say the operation was a success, but the patient died??? Would you say your marriage will be a success as soon as your husband drops dead... The form is never more healthy than the relationship... The principals so many seek to realize are killing us the closer they get to perfection... Well there is no perfect marriage, no perfect forms, no perfect principals; but those which come closest are good because they serve the relationship and structure cooperation so that both ends of it get what they want and need out of it... Anything less is not a good form; and you have to recognize that bad forms do not just kill their members, or suck the life out of them, but lead to their extinction, so that not even their children survive....
Our principals are killing us... And when you consider that the entire story of history is the story of changing forms, and that it was as difficult for other people in other ages, and as essential for them to change their forms of relationship; you can get my point... We fear change as we fear death; but change we must, and what we must change is our social forms, and that is only possible with an understanding of our moral forms, our principals...You cannot accept principals as fact simply because they have been handed to you as established truth... There is no such thing even in science that deals with physical forms...You may use your principals in the process of thought so long as you do not take them for granted... You cannot use principals instead of thought... If for example, if we reason that justice is one of the virtues, and that all the virtues are good for humanity, and that their practice is morality, you still have to judge virtues as understood in the light of obvious human good and happiness, and not judge only humanity as good only when following your sense of morality...So much of the pessimism of the right rests upon judgements made through faulty principals and moral forms... For such people, good, good in others and good in self is an illusion...
Thanks....Sweeney
Comment: #3
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Tue Mar 19, 2013 2:18 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
David Limbaugh
May. `13
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
28 29 30 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31 1
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Betsy McCaughey
Betsy McCaugheyUpdated 15 May 2013
Ben Shapiro
Ben ShapiroUpdated 15 May 2013
Joseph Farah
Joseph FarahUpdated 15 May 2013

1 Feb 2011 Liberal 'Tolerance' Toward Bristol Palin

12 Oct 2007 Liberty or Security -- a False Choice

7 Apr 2009 Somewhere Under the Rainbow