opinion web
Liberal Opinion General Opinion
David Limbaugh
David Limbaugh
9 Feb 2016
Fear Not, My Secular Friends

It amuses me that certain people are convinced that Christians are angry scolds but totally miss the … Read More.

5 Feb 2016
Ted Cruz and the Body of Christ

There is a misplaced fear — shared, I'm sad to say, by many on the right — that Christian … Read More.

2 Feb 2016
In His Own Words

David Limbaugh is off. The following is a column by Erick Erickson. "As far as single payer, it works in Canada,… Read More.

The Left, Not Social Conservatives, Threatens Religious Liberty


Now hear this: No Republicans on the national political scene, including Rick Santorum, threaten our religious liberty. Many Democrats, including President Obama and Senate Democrats, do. And they've struck again with the Senate's defeat of the Blunt amendment.

President Obama, who seems to spend as much time community organizing as he does attending to his executive duties, doubtlessly conspired with his crack opposition research trolls and the liberal media to shoehorn the contraception issue into the 2012 presidential campaign.

What do I mean about Obama's spending time community organizing? Well, he is using the office of the presidency to intimidate the Koch brothers into disclosing their donors' names. He and his minions falsely, with malice aforethought, accused the U.S. Chamber of Commerce of receiving foreign contributions, with no evidence, and when challenged to substantiate it, they taunted that it was up to the chamber and its defenders to prove a negative. Obama's Justice Department has taxpayer-funded employees posing as ordinary American citizens and posting pro-Obama agenda comments on various websites. His Justice Department attacks Republicans genuinely attempting to monitor actual voter fraud and protects his friends who engage in real-life voter intimidation. I could go on.

What do I mean about Democrats and their cronies shoehorning the contraception issue? I'm hardly among the first 100 people to point out that George Stephanopoulos gratuitously injected into a GOP presidential debate a bizarre question about contraception. Mitt Romney was so taken aback he was almost rendered — uncharacteristically — speechless.

In no time, talk shows and the Internet were abuzz about the issue, and a video of Rick Santorum talking about contraception went viral. Even some on the right — though not social conservatives — were apparently led to believe that if elected president, Santorum would single-handedly usher in a Catholic theocracy. It didn't seem to matter that in that same video, Santorum expressly assured us that he would not attempt to force his views on contraception through legislation.

When you ask complainants to specify exactly how Santorum or any other social conservative represents a threat to religious liberty or would even remotely infringe on any of our constitutional rights concerning it, you get nothing but innuendo and fantastic hysteria.

Santorum and other social conservatives may well annoy those who don't want to hear about social issues, but they do not represent any kind of threat to religious liberties, nor are they any less concerned about the cataclysmic fiscal and economic issues threatening our nation or any less determined and equipped to address them simply because they also care about social issues.

President Obama and the Democratic leadership, on the other hand, do represent a threat to religious liberty, and they invoke religion as often as Republicans — whether from the presidential bully pulpit and National Prayer Breakfast podium or in their churches.

Democrats warn that Republicans will use their governmental power to cram our religious values down their throats, but at least when we vote our values, we do so through the constitutionally prescribed democratic processes rather than through undemocratic, tyrannical judicial usurpations such as with abortion and same-sex marriage jurisprudence.

President Obama is the one who, in a flagrant breach of his numerous promises, is facilitating the federal funding of abortifacients and cramming this issue down the throats of the several states.

He's the one forcing us — because of his "religious" values; listen to his prayer breakfast speech — to buy health insurance and telling us what types of coverage must be included in the health insurance policies we purchase, even if some of those violate our rights of religious and moral conscience and thus our religious liberties guaranteed by the First Amendment to the Constitution.

He's the one who, when called on this outrage, patronizingly pretended to compromise on the issue by forcing insurance companies to pay for these objectionable practices, as if those costs wouldn't be passed through to those with conscience objections and as if the insurance companies have no conscience protections themselves.

He's the one who, along with his Democratic majority in the Senate, tabled the amendment by Sen.

Roy Blunt to allow employers to opt out of providing health care coverage that violates their conscience rights. The Blunt amendment, it should be noted, wouldn't deny any woman access to contraceptives or even abortifacients; it would just exempt employers from being forced to subsidize them. As usual, the government compulsion proceeds from the left, not the right. Adding insult to injury, Democrats, as usual, drench their support of the coerced coverage in the euphemism of women's health.

We social conservatives might annoy you because we sometimes talk about our faith-based values (while the left talks about its values just as much), but we represent no threat to anyone's religious liberties. The same cannot be said about the habitually projecting political left.

David Limbaugh is a writer, author and attorney. His latest book, "Crimes Against Liberty," was No. 1 on the New York Times best-seller list for nonfiction for its first two weeks. Follow him on Twitter @davidlimbaugh and his website at To read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at



2 Comments | Post Comment
Re: Thetruth
I pay everyday for things I don't believe in, I and my great-grandchildren will never pay off the debt from Bush's wars, I don't believe in war, everytime some 80 year old goat wants to harass his long sufferIng wife for unwanted sex, I pay for his Viagra. I pay for farmers to get rich off subsidies, I pay for corporations who ship jobs off shore to sell their goods here. It goes on and on, so what makes the Catholic church special? I pay for breeders to get vasectomies, I think Mr. Wonderful should quit breeding on his own, or pay for his own vasectomy, why should I pay for him to have sex? I don't want my tax dollars paying for his surgery. I don't want to subsidize oil companies to clean up oil spills, I don't want to pay for medical care for idiots who are chronically ill because they are obese and won't quit smoking. I pay for this every time I go to work. I don't want to pay for idiots who keep breeding when the wife is too old, like the Santorum's disabled daughter and the Duggar's preemies...they keep having kids way past a safe age for the wife, we all pay for them through skewed insurance rates and higher premiums. Their kids medical care can run in the millions of dollars, even when they have insurance. So who is the Catholic church to think they are something special? We all pay for things we don't believe in, that's how it works. Grow up !!!
Comment: #1
Posted by: Bloom Hilda
Mon Mar 5, 2012 8:38 AM
Should that be how it works though? Paying for things you don't believe in. How about the governments gets out of peoples lives, stops taxing them so much, and let people spend the money on what THEY believe in. Most times government gets involved in anything in leads to a mess. I don't trust Washington suits. Why do liberals?
Comment: #2
Posted by: Chris McCoy
Mon Mar 5, 2012 9:21 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right: comments policy
David Limbaugh
Feb. `16
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 1 2 3 4 5
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Authorís Podcast
Star ParkerUpdated 10 Feb 2016
Brent Bozell
Betsy McCaughey
Betsy McCaugheyUpdated 10 Feb 2016

16 Jan 2012 Mark Levin's 'Ameritopia'

30 Sep 2010 'Finding $700 Billion Is Not Easy' -- if You're a Socialist

30 Mar 2007 Confronting the Donkey