creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion General Opinion
David Limbaugh
David Limbaugh
23 Sep 2014
Student Bullies Trump 1st Amendment

Well, the wild and crazy 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals is at it again, this time ruling that in a … Read More.

19 Sep 2014
Steve Springer, Evangelism and the Divine Conspiracy

In my new book, "Jesus on Trial," I explain how the Bible itself serves as its own apologetic. Holy Scripture,… Read More.

12 Sep 2014
Christianity Grounded in the Historical Fact of the Resurrection

Jesus' apostles and other disciples were willing to die for him. But so what? Haven't the followers of other … Read More.

Obama's Hope and Change Promise Reconsidered

Comment

When Obama promised "hope and change" as a candidate, I think he had in mind a new paradigm, one of restructuring America's economic system in his image rather than triggering economic growth, though he wanted the electorate to believe that growth was his focus.

The economy had turned south by the time Obama was trumpeting that platitude, but that was largely caused by liberal affordable housing policies — the very type of program Obama would promote in office.

The dismal state of the economy played into Obama's hands, but I dare say he would have pushed for hope and change regardless of economic conditions, because he was offering more than economic solutions. He presented himself as the whole package — a quasi-deity who would transform the entire country, slow the rise of the oceans and heal the planet.

With a backdrop of spiritually bankrupt people who were ripe for the lie that government could fill that god-shaped void in their beings, Obama strategically milked his messianic mirage. He constructed Greek columns, produced ethereal voice echo effects and adopted a conspicuous head-lift affectation to build a cultlike following that even ensnared a number of frighteningly credulous self-styled conservatives, such as New York Times columnist David Brooks.

How has Obama done if we measure his promise of hope and change in purely economic terms? Well, despite his tired efforts to scapegoat former President George W. Bush and the global markets, this is his economy, and it is demonstrably worse in every imaginable category. He has given us change, but it is destructive change. He has given us hope, but it is hope that the nightmare he has engineered will soon be over.

But what if, instead, we gauge Obama's promise in broader terms? It's more apparent every day that he was not talking about improving the economic misery index when he promised hope and change — though he certainly exploited the recession that serendipitously coincided with his campaign to imply that he was.

To be properly interpreted, the phrase has to be considered along with his pledge to fundamentally change America and his frequent allusions to "spreading the wealth around." He had in mind changing the "social contract" between America and its people.

Just look at the recent viral video of Elizabeth Warren, his former financial reform adviser, who essentially tells us that America's economic winners have been successful on the backs of the poor.

Part of the "social contract," says Warren, is to "take a hunk of that and pay forward for the next kid who comes along." Can you hear echoes of Obama's "spread the wealth around" here?

Like Obama, Warren doesn't believe capitalism is a fair or moral system. Nor is Warren an isolated example. Nearly every one of Obama's czars shares this Marxist mindset.

Most socialists are not about economic prosperity. Oh, they'll use Keynesian theory that deficit spending stimulates economic growth to justify their demand for more government expenditures. But in the end, Obama's "stimulus" package wasn't even fair to John Maynard Keynes.

Don't get me wrong; the obscene forced federal expenditures wouldn't have succeeded in stimulating the economy even if Obama had used them for that purpose. But he didn't, and it is pretty hard to deny in hindsight that he never intended to.

Before he commandeered the $868 billion, he assured us it would go to shovel-ready jobs and get people back to work again. It was only after the fact that he cynically laughed in our faces about the unavailability of such jobs. (He's doing the same thing all over again with his latest jobs bill.)

Despite his promise that he would strictly account for this money and watchdog against its waste, he threw gobs of it away to locations with phantom ZIP codes, to ACORN-like political allies, to unions and to corrupt environmental wastelands, such as Solyndra.

There was no private-sector economic multiplier effect for any of Obama's stimulus expenditures. The only multiplier effect in this and his other spending bills was in the public sector. Obama furtively tucked into these bills many perpetually sustaining federal programs that would remain with us, continue to grow and further choke the private sector.

Thus, if you measure Obama's promise of hope and change against his true intention, he might well be succeeding. As one who believes that America's free market is unfair, he has gone a long way toward shaking up that structure — and he's not even close to being finished. He has taken from the producers and redistributed to those his administration deems worthy of the transfer payments.

Obama may not be deliberately destroying the U.S. economy, but he is implementing policies that are allowing the central planners to pick the winners and losers and, in the process, smothering the private sector and wrecking our fiscal future.

David Limbaugh is a writer, author and attorney. His latest book, "Crimes Against Liberty," was No. 1 on the New York Times best-seller list for nonfiction for its first two weeks. Follow him on Twitter @davidlimbaugh and his website at www.davidlimbaugh.com. To read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2011 CREATORS.COM



Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment
Interesting article filled with good ideas. My view of the 1990s was skeptical. Come on, a bunch of media hype along with The Cosby Show and Roseanne saying the country was booming? If many people were fools and believed that, well... My position was I would continue to study and try to figure out what was going on. My generation, the Baby Boomers, had been hurt by President Reagan. After all, we had become "yuppies" each attempting to grab as much as we could of the so called American Dream. We had followed John Lennon's house husband example and tried to reach Maslow four, meaning to life, by raising children. Now, we found that Reagan's economy actually meant that the money would be out in the communities working instead of in our 401ks? No way, man. With a concerted effort, we white, privileged Boomers could elect Bill Clinton, listen to Bill Maher, and get what was rightfully ours. George Carlin called it "give me that, it's mine," in a very sarcastic routine. The real estate problem has an element no one talks about. When a new house is built and a couple buys the house, the bank gives the complete amount, for example, $150,000 to the builder and he escapes with that. He has used illegal aliens to toss up houses in all the major cities. This could actually be described as an organized crime model if it was not, in fact, actual organized crime itself. The buyers of the new houses came from the older houses, so to get free of those previous mortgages, the new buyers needed the mediocre credit people to buy the old houses. Question, who owned the land on the outskirts of San Diego and Las Vegas, and where did they escape to with the billions of dollars of bank funds paid for the cheap houses thrown up by illegal alien carpenters?
Comment: #1
Posted by: Mike Hayne
Sat Sep 24, 2011 8:22 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
David Limbaugh
Sep. `14
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 1 2 3 4
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Authorís Podcast
Ben Shapiro
Ben ShapiroUpdated 24 Sep 2014
Walter Williams
Walter E. WilliamsUpdated 24 Sep 2014
Dennis Prager
Dennis PragerUpdated 23 Sep 2014

18 Feb 2011 Responsible Adults Cannot Ignore These Numbers

29 Apr 2014 GOP, Rediscover Your Backbone

23 Oct 2009 Obama's Uncompromising Inner Man