creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion General Opinion
David Limbaugh
David Limbaugh
17 Feb 2012
Conservatives Must Remain United

A strong move is on to demonize and marginalize social conservatives, a move that originates from the … Read More.

14 Feb 2012
President Magoo Needs No Delphic Oracle

President Obama is nothing if not an incorrigible spendaholic, as his new budget reconfirms in spades. While … Read More.

10 Feb 2012
Obama Invites Backlash on Conscience Rule Betrayal

As God's instrument, Moses parted the Red Sea. Well, it appears President Obama has a different idea. With a … Read More.

Calling All Blue Dogs

Share Comment

The most important thing to understand about the Democrats' domestic agenda is that they care more about establishing government control over our lives than they do about the stated policy goals of their proposals.

It's true of their fraudulently named stimulus packages, their cap-and-tax scheme and especially their universal health care plans.

With all of these programs and more, their driving aim is not only to acquire power for the sake of acquiring it but also to use government to impose their values on us and, effectively, destroy our personal liberties. The subject of liberty — the very impetus for the founding of this nation — is rarely mentioned in the public debate.

That is why we'll never convince them with evidence, from the growing scientific skepticism about global warming to the proven failed track record of Keynesian economics to the universal failure rate of socialized medicine throughout the world.

But it is also why they'll never persuade the public to go along with their mischief if the facts get out, which explains their unilateral declaration of a consensus on global warming and their refusal to debate the issue, their historical revisionism on the failures of New Deal stimuli, and their perpetual urgency in rushing their entire agenda through simultaneously — before the public can even digest their proposals, much less organize to oppose them.

Health care is this week's crisis. Here, it's imperative we recognize that they're more interested in imposing their values on abortion, end-stage medical care, and economic equality than in the quality of health care.

CNSNews.com reports that congressional Democrats want abortion to be included as a health benefit in both government and private insurance plans — using taxpayer money to fund abortion on demand. This exposes the lie that they want to reduce the number of abortions. Please.

The plan would also inevitably result in government rationing of care, and the liberals driving the plan, such as Tom Daschle (in his 2008 book, "Critical: What We Can Do About the Health-Care Crisis"), have made clear their opinion that the elderly are the most expendable. The plan would result in government bureaucrats, rather than your doctor, having the final say over your care options.

Then there's the wealth-redistribution mentality forever driving President Obama — his obsession with leveling the economic playing field that underlies all of his major policy initiatives.

This obsession explains why he supports capital gains tax increases even though they would hurt everyone, his endless appetite for soaking the rich with increasingly confiscatory taxes, and his single-minded determination to bankrupt this nation through no-growth deficit spending.

It explains why he is willing to destroy our health care system in the name of requiring everyone — whether they want it or not — to have health insurance.

This point was brought home to me when I was listening to an audio clip of Sen. Tom Coburn, a physician, wherein he states that if America had established a government-run health care system like Canada's or Britain's 10 years ago, we'd have 1 million fewer Americans alive today. Coburn bases this on our increased life expectancy. "Our survival rates on cancer, malignancies and coronary artery disease," he says, "are so far better because we have available technology and acute intervention, as well as prevention, that those countries don't have."

When will Americans open their eyes? Everything about Obama's plan is a lie. He says he wants to increase competition and choice, improve the quality of health care, reduce costs, and achieve universal coverage. But his plan would reduce competition, with mandatory government controls and mandates that would require uniformity of coverage. It would dramatically increase overall costs by artificially increasing demand. It would destroy the quality of health care, and it would crowd out and force out private insurers, through stacking the deck in favor of the euphemistically labeled "public option." Congressional Budget Office projections indicate that for all the Draconian coverage mandates, the plan wouldn't even solve the overarching problem of insurance coverage. Of course, the insurance coverage issue has been enormously distorted by this bunch, by their failure to disclose that millions of the uninsured are not American citizens, millions are young and healthy and choose not to buy insurance though they can afford it, and almost half of the uninsured only remain so for an average of four months.

On top of all this, have you seen the horrifying chart being circulated by Republican congressmen illustrating the bureaucratic nightmare that awaits us if we adopt this plan? And for what? Reduced health care quality, choice, costs and availability — in exchange for economy-destroying tax increases.

Now is the time for all good Blue Dog Democrats to come to the aid of their country.

David Limbaugh is a writer, author and attorney. His book "Bankrupt: The Intellectual and Moral Bankruptcy of Today's Democratic Party" was released recently in paperback. To find out more about David Limbaugh, please visit his Web site at www.DavidLimbaugh.com. To read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2009 CREATORS.COM


Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment
Sir;...Your story is the usual one: If you buy the predicate, you will buy the lie that follows...If I were inclined to believe that the democrats care more about establishing government control over our lives than anyone else, well, then I would be stupid or demented...Government should govern, but majority rule means each party of liars must jocky for some advantage to justify their power, their abuse, and their failures...From my perspective not one party or the other has any right to complain, or to brag... Each has failed and misled this people, in part because the consensus of the people was never required, and so the people were never educated, and never consulted... They were told what they wanted, and given or denied as suited the rich and the powerful... Well; what do we do now??? Now that we cannot afford for profit health care; what will we do???... Could it get worse??? Now; the old surrender the capital of a life time to have a moment more of life... Now; the young, the pregnant and the distant suffer the want of medicine that often robs them of youth, strength, health, and life... What would change if we had universal insurance??? We would first be healthier because the government would not support ill health on both ends, giving tax breaks to those who poison us, and rob us of health, and then paying for our treatment...The cost would not change at all, but the health of the nation would not be used to break the poor, the old, and the government... Some body pays... If the bills are not paid, the hospitals will fold up, and people will die...When some one goes to hospital sick and poor, the bill is paid by those with insurance who can no longer afford the cost, and as more and more people lose insurance, the price goes higher and higher for those with insurance... It was not so long ago that auto plants were moving to Canada simply because universal coverage made their cost of insurance, and doing business in general that much lower... The bill gets paid, but if the rich have been made super rich because they could avoid paying for insurance, then that should end... Is that not your true fear???Isn't that the terror for all rich people, that the government should govern, and take its support from those who can afford to pay it since the rich have taken their wealth from the whole nation??? The poor are sorely taxed, and the government is ruined to take care of all those made worthless and idle in the name of profit... The government is broke to maintain a huge military presence in the world where our rich have made us many enemies... The rich absolutely refuse to pay their share, and so they have abrogated their right to the protection of the government... The government should tax them since they will not voluntarily give the people justice... And that is the bottom line...That is the question here: Whether government has the ability to achieve the good goals, clearly stated, that it has set for itself in the constitution, or whether it will languish and linger on, being a nuisance and an impediment to the people in reaching justice... My bet is on the latter... You advocate for do nothing government... Have we not had enough of that??? And will we not have far more??? .. Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #1
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Fri Jul 17, 2009 7:46 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
David Limbaugh
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 27 Feb 2012
Mark Levy
Mark LevyUpdated 18 Feb 2012
Oliver North
Oliver NorthUpdated 17 Feb 2012

21 Dec 2010 Understanding the Left's Intolerance for Intolerance

21 Jul 2009 More Health Care Lies

20 May 2011 Obama and Democrats, Not Republicans, Need to Answer for Debt Ceiling