creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion General Opinion
David Harsanyi
David Harsanyi
8 Aug 2014
Have You Taken Your Obama Oath?

Jonathan Alter at The Daily Beast has an idea that will infuse the president's "economic patriotism" rhetoric … Read More.

1 Aug 2014
Seriously, What Is John Kerry Doing?

Let's concede for a moment that most of us don't believe the United States should be taking sides in … Read More.

25 Jul 2014
Are Teachers Underpaid? Let's Find Out

A teacher in South Dakota with a bachelor's degree and 10 years of experience earns $33,600 per year, which … Read More.

Can It Be? A Party for Capitalism?

Comment

For perhaps the first time in American history, seemingly rational adults will sit down and spend significant time dissecting the off-off-year elections in Virginia, New Jersey and New York's much-discussed 23rd Congressional District.

Naturally, a consensus will emerge:

The angry, hard-right, radical, insane (etc.) conservative base has hijacked the Republican Party and, in the process, further alienated a beleaguered nation — a nation that apparently is hankering for tripling deficits and government takeovers of the health care, energy, banking and car industries.

Like Democrats, I, too, hope Republicans suffer. By focusing on needless culture wars, nurturing government centralization and growth, and spending without restraint, the GOP has downgraded fiscal conservatism to nothing more than election-time rhetoric over the past decade. And not surprisingly, Republican identification is also at an all-time low.

So how is it, some wonder, that a recent Gallup Poll claims that "conservative" remains the dominant ideological group in this nation — with between 39 and 41 percent of voters identifying themselves as either "very conservative" or "conservative"?

The percentage of independents describing their views as "conservative" has also grown, to 35 percent from 29 percent in just one year.

What does it mean to be conservative these days? I mean, "conservative" happens to be the default self-identifying ideological designation of nearly every Republican politician (and some Democrats, too); so in Washington, at least, we know it means very little.

In the real world, I imagine many non-ideologically inclined voters tend to see themselves as conservative, as well. And with a president who has yet to meet an industry he doesn't believe needs to be managed by the loving but firm hands of Washington, this increasingly must mean fiscal conservatism.

The rise of free market populism in this country finally has manifested in an election.

And judging from the hyperbolic reactions, you know it's a political movement with staying power.

When tepid, traditional conservative candidate Doug Hoffman knocked off liberal Republican Dede Scozzafava — a candidate who was supported by nearly every boogeyman in the GOP handbook — you might have thought that the rabble had stormed the Bastille.

Sophisticated New York Times columnist Frank Rich called the event "a riotous and bloody national G.O.P. civil war" and compared the conservative surge to a murderous Stalinist purge. (Remarkably, the esteemed wordsmith failed to unleash similar histrionic language when one-time-Democrat Sen. Joe Lieberman met the same fate.)

Purging moderates is indeed a self-destructive strategy for any national party. But running a party without any litmus tests on the central issue of the economy seems to be similarly self-defeating.

The most impressive trick played by Rich and other liberals, though, is creating a narrative wherein the ones attempting to fundamentally reconfigure the American economy are cast as the moderates.

The nearly powerless who stand in their way? Well, they play the part of Stalinists.

Now, I'm not nearly as smart as Frank Rich, but I do know that the single ideological bond that holds together all factions of the right is a belief in capitalism and economic freedom. Or, at least, it should be.

In fact, as Arthur C. Brooks, American Enterprise Institute president, summed it up, "there is a major cultural schism developing in America. But it's not over abortion, same-sex marriage or home schooling, as important as these issues are. The new divide centers on free enterprise — the principle at the core of American culture."

The next few elections will tell us whether this tenant of American culture has staying power — and whether there will be a political party to champion it.

David Harsanyi is a columnist at The Denver Post and the author of "Nanny State." Visit his Web site at www.DavidHarsanyi.com. To find out more about David Harsanyi and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2009 THE DENVER POST

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM



Comments

0 Comments | Post Comment
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
David Harsanyi
Aug. `14
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Ben Carson
Ben CarsonUpdated 20 Aug 2014
Brent Bozell
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 20 Aug 2014

16 Sep 2009 Why Can't We All Just Get Along?

15 Oct 2009 In Praise of No, No, No

28 Mar 2014 The 'Creationism' Distraction