creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion General Opinion
Brent Bozell
L. Brent Bozell
25 May 2012
Canada's 'Scientific' Museum of Smut

In Ottawa, the nation's capital of Canada, the Museum of Science and Technology has decided to provide school … Read More.

23 May 2012
Shameless Bias by Omission

You'd think the largest legal action in American history in defense of religious liberty would be a major … Read More.

18 May 2012
NBC Revives Howard Stern

Howard Stern has not been missed since he took his smutty shtick off the airwaves and onto the unregulated … Read More.

Weak Knees At the White House

Share Comment

The raucous sound of applause for President Obama when he spoke at the White House Correspondents Dinner underlined what could be the news media's motto: "You had us at hello." They shamelessly cheered and screamed even louder when he only half-joked, "I am Barack Obama. Most of you covered me. All of you voted for me."

The public should wonder: Are the media too personally infatuated with this president? A recent video even showed the White House press corps standing up in homage when President Obama entered the briefing room — a definite, emotional break with the normal, disinterested stay-seated routine for that room. Any sense of detachment is utterly missing, even in their body language.

In the media's own mythology, they are the constant, unbending defenders of democracy who "speak truth to power" and refuse to act as a "stenographer" for the power elite. In the unfolding reality, our national press has become one giant ... poodle to this president.

Rich Noyes of the Media Research Center has finished a new report titled "Cheerleaders for the Revolution," examining the network TV coverage of Obama during his first 100 days. The results are pathetic. What we're seeing aren't reporters. They are walking, talking press releases.

President Obama is very rapidly transforming American government into a European socialist model, and the study found that no network used the word "socialist" to describe Obama's plans. So is he a far-leftist? No. A leftist? No. They couldn't even call him a "liberal" as he took over banks and car companies, started firing CEOs and micromanaging bankruptcies to enable his campaign funders in the auto-worker unions.

Truth is the first casualty of their affections. Take the Obama budget. It carries an astounding price tag of $3.5 trillion, with an expected deficit of $1.75 trillion, or half the entire budget. Under Obama's budget plans, the national debt would explode to more than $20 trillion by 2019, the Congressional Budget Office determined. But in the four days leading up to Obama's putative State of the Union speech, as he organized fatuous "fiscal responsibility" events, the obsequious network evening newscasts painted the president more as a deficit fighter 83 percent of the time. Only in 17 percent of the soundbites was he painted as a big spender.

Their choice of stories was very selective.

The networks went on a feeding frenzy against big corporate bonuses. The networks aired six times more statements forwarding the "infuriated" reaction to business than criticized politicians' grandstanding. The networks spent days decrying AIG's $165 million in bonuses, but spiked the $210 million handed out by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (the bailed-out mortgage giants with strong Democratic ties). ABC and NBC completely ignored the Fannie and Freddie bonuses. CBS gave it a whopping 27 seconds.

On every issue, the networks showered Obama with praise. The networks applauded Obama's decision to use taxpayer money to fund embryo-destroying stem cell research. "Scientists tonight tell us they are overjoyed by the news, saying Monday will be a great day for science and for patients," cooed ABC's Lisa Stark.

The networks piled on the positives for the president's actions on global warming. When Obama demanded higher fuel-economy standards for cars, "The change in course delighted the president's audience of long-suffering environmental activists," CBS's Chip Reid reported.

Even President Obama's decision to send thousands of additional troops to Afghanistan was greeted by nearly unanimous positive coverage — a far cry from the highly negative coverage of President Bush's successful troop surge in Iraq two years ago. The networks offered praise for Obama's surge, even as Obama had opposed Bush's Iraq surge.

On issue after issue, too many stories offered the opinions of only Obama and his minions. Critics were scarce.

It's not surprising that most presidents get a honeymoon in the early months. But Obama's TV news coverage has been better than any other modern president has received. The networks assaulted the tax-cut proposals of Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush right away. The anchormen pressured George H. W. Bush to read their lips and abandon his "no new taxes" in the first 100 days. Even Bill Clinton drew some negative coverage from TV news stars disappointed at his clumsy Cabinet picking and front-loading the issue of gays in the military.

But Obama is a savior — a savior of the economy, a savior of the environment, and a savior of America's confidence and its reputation around the globe. Those screams and cheers at the White House Correspondents' Dinner are just a tiny bit more pronounced than the "news" that anchors and reporters have offered every day, in every way.

L. Brent Bozell III is the president of the Media Research Center. To find out more about Brent Bozell III, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2009 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.


Comments

5 Comments | Post Comment
My question is and always will be....what can we do about it besides vote.
How can we reverse the damage and stop the damage NOW. We can wait no longer.
No one will listen to me. I am just a mom without a microphone.
We must stop this insanity.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Radulovich
Wed May 13, 2009 3:55 AM
From the article: "no network used the word "socialist" to describe Obama's plans. So is he a far-leftist? No. A leftist?"

Networks didn't call Bush a socialist when he advocated public ownership of Iraq's oil which is socialism by definition.

Networks didn't call Palin a socialist even though she believes that oil profits should be distributed to the people based on citizenship rather than investment in the oil companies.

Based on Mr. Bozell's "reasoning" Bush and Palin are socialists and far leftists.

Mr. Bozell is not someone who one can believe if one is capable of clear thought.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Pericles
Wed May 13, 2009 5:56 PM
Re: Radulovich;...Where is your gun Moma??? Who needs a microphone who has a gun??? I don't know what your rush is... You guys don't like the way the vote went, so now you want to kill democracy... It never was democracy...Majority rule is not democracy...Voting for a dictator every four years is not democracy..Do you think Mr. Bush could have started world war three if we had a democracy???..When was the last time you ever got to vote on an actual issue that affected your life???You vote for some guy who decides everything for you....That is not democracy...That is insanity...Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #3
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Wed May 13, 2009 7:53 PM
Re: Pericles;...Socialism is government over industry...Now we have government over people so that enterprise can be free, so industry can be free, and so finance can be free...I would rather have people free, and business governed, because ungoverned the people must suffer both tyranny from government, and anarchy from business... Where has it gotten us??? Can you tell me how well capitalism works??? Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #4
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Wed May 13, 2009 7:57 PM
Sir;...Don't you pity this long suffering people that we must trust this poor African-American with out futures...Does that not make you doubt the past that has brought us to this point in time of such desparation???What was good about yesterday to have brought today... Were all the years of Nixon, Reagan, and Bush X2 for nothing??? If they did not save us from the pitiful situation you find us in, how were they great, and what good did they do??? Look at that little nut job Hitler... Do you think the Germans actually wanted tthat self affected fairy as their leader??? Look at the Russians...Do you think think they wanted that maimed maniac as their Autocrat??? Do you think the French wanted that shrimp Napoleon to waste them on Europe's battlefields??? People are put into the situation where they must invest hope in individuals by the failures of their governments to act responsibly, and to govern with an eye to the future...The news media did not elect Mr. Obama...We elected Mr. Obama out of dire necessity because of the outright, undeniable, and entirely avoidable problems brought forth by prior administrations...None of the presidents want to go as far as they need to, and none of them go far enough...Mr. Obama will not go far enough, and that can be clearly seen...So he does not deserve to be re-elected, but needs to be washed up with the whole government...This people, whether they want to admit it or not has outgrown their government...I can talk to you as easily as you can read these words, if you can read...But government gets in the way of our communication with each other...Government is the place where the people should talk, and there, only money talks...People are guided by their ideologies...You are guided by your ideologies...The government is governed by ideals when it needs to be governed by reason, and by the people...We need government, and we need democracy, and now we have neither...So do not abuse the press for the election of Mr. Obama....Your class corrupts every politician they can use...Don't cry about Mr. Obama, or abuse him... Corrupt him rotten so he is no good for the people if you think the government can stand it...Corrode his virtue...Show the people that their great hope has feet of clay, and pockets full of dough....Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #5
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Wed May 13, 2009 8:23 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
L. Brent Bozell
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Oliver North
Oliver NorthUpdated 25 May 2012
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 25 May 2012
David Limbaugh
David LimbaughUpdated 25 May 2012

4 Aug 2010 Newsweek, Still Devolving

1 Apr 2009 Washington Polling Games

2 Jul 2008 Who Dares Oppose the Obamas?