creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion General Opinion
Brent Bozell
L. Brent Bozell
31 Oct 2014
The Domestic Violence Blacklist

The "No More" TV advertisement blitz against domestic violence by professional athletes is obnoxious and … Read More.

29 Oct 2014
Hillary Clinton Flunks Economics

Liberals have this terrible and annoying habit of congratulating themselves for their intellectual heft … Read More.

24 Oct 2014
The Terrorist-Sympathizing Opera

The Metropolitan Opera in New York City is hardly a site for hundreds of angry protesters. But they have … Read More.

Selling Sex and Candy?

Comment

I watch some commercials on television and am amazed that the corporate sponsor really signed off on the product. Think about the expressions on the faces of the dark suits in the executive boardroom when they were presented with some of the commercials running on TV right now.

Take Jack in the Box. "Jack Box," the fast-food chain's mascot — a man wearing what looks like a Ping-Pong-ball head or a snowman getup with a clown hat — is sitting playing a game much like Scrabble with a beautiful blonde. He lays out the nonword "swavory," selling a waffle breakfast sandwich for having savory sausage and sweet maple waffles. The blonde then lays on the board letters reading "No Nookie." Jack says, "What's that supposed to ... ? Oh." Is sexual slang really necessary to sell breakfast sandwiches during prime time?

Chicago Tribune columnist Eric Zorn had this reaction to Jack's misfortune: "The resulting image in my mind's eye is cricky — a combination of creepy and icky."

That's not as edgy as a new TV ad for Skittles, the popular children's candy — meaning the ad is targeted to children. It begins with a young woman kissing a walrus. This is not a peck; it's a moaning make-out session. "What are you doing?" asks another woman who discovers them. "Hey, this isn't what it looks like," says the kissing woman on the couch. "Good, because it looks like you're making out with my boyfriend," the second woman says. The other replies: "This isn't Bobby. It just looks like Bobby."

At least the audience might think the "boyfriend" here might be a human in someone's mind. But unlike the Snickers ads, the walrus never becomes someone else. It remains an ugly, flippered, mustachioed walrus. The kissing girl says of the walrus, "He says he's like these new Skittles Riddles. The colors on the outside don't match the flavors on the inside." She flirts with/teases the walrus with the candy, "You can't have it; you can't have it," before returning to the make-out session.

The advocacy group One Million Moms launched a campaign protesting the ad to Wrigley, arguing "not only is it disgusting, it is taking lightly the act of bestiality.

While the shock value of this ad may draw attention to your product, it is harmful to children."

Let's fact it, this is a thoroughly bizarre way to sell candy to children, if the message is focused on taste, quality, nutrition — anything like that. But it's not. Commercials are designed to be cool , to make young people point and laugh. So the dark-suited executives quietly, and surely uncomfortably, acquiesce. They will agree to try anything to scandalize people into paying attention to their sales pitch.

The walrus in the commercial is not a real animal, but something animatronic. After all, Wrigley doesn't want to upset the people who protest animal cruelty during filming. On the other hand, upsetting people who protest indecencies to children doesn't bother them at all.

In the world of print ads, the candy makers at Mentos are using nudity to sell their new "Pure Fresh" gum — or to be precise, they're covering nudity with their product. In an ad in Maxim, they cover the rear end of a young woman pulling down her panties with a package of gum with the slogan "Look, we have gum!"

There are also ads like this in more mainstream magazines with large teenaged readerships. In an ad slated to run in the celebrity glossies People, In Touch and Us Weekly, the gum covers up an accidentally exposed woman's breast at "(Wardrobe) Malfunction Junction! She took two steps into the limelight and her dress gave way." In an ad planned for Sports Illustrated and ESPN The Magazine, the Mentos gum package covers the crotch of a streaker at a soccer game.

The ad makers at The Martin Agency of Richmond explained to Ad Week that the ads "spotlight the juxtaposition between the innocent quirkiness of Mentos and the not-so-innocent content of the ads." Translation: Sex sells.

But do they have to use sex to sell products designed for children? Where do they stop? Using sex to sell Cap'n Crunch cereal or Oscar Mayer Lunchables? Scripting make-out sessions with Ronald McDonald or Tony the Tiger? How about Butt-Naked Barbie having sex with Ken? The world of commercials is devolving just like the rest of television. Shock wins, and good taste is routed.

L. Brent Bozell III is the president of the Media Research Center. To find out more about Brent Bozell III, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2012 CREATORS.COM



Comments

3 Comments | Post Comment
I usually don't do this, but I'll agree with Bozell that making out with animals to sell candy is inappropriate. I love skittles and I usually like their ads, but this dosen't make me want to go buy some. As far as the Maxim thing goes, if you're old enough to read a maxim, then chances are you can handle a suggestive or lewd ad.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Chris McCoy
Fri Aug 31, 2012 9:33 AM
Sir;... Not to take it lightly: Loving a republican is an act of beastiality... You will look in vain for any of the higher qualities that make humans human... They are like dogs who think that every dish is theirs, who bark at everybody and whine always to be in your lap... They are like pigs, and chickens, and monkeys, too... They are like horses in none of the ways that makes horses noble, and in every sense that makes them obstinate, obdurate, irrational, and idiosyncratic... They are like snakes, frightening even when not dangerous, and living in the past... Shall I go on???
It is no wonder these beasts seek out their own kind to mate with... They are incapable of having their foolish principals challenged by reality, and they prefer to assume that reality is wrong, and they are right... They are like parrots repeating words they do not understand with implications they cannot grasp... They are like crows to whom all that glitters is gold... They are like Yahoos...
Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #2
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Tue Sep 4, 2012 3:34 AM
Sweeney you truly are a useful idiot. Keep worshipping a bunch of elitist, incompetent, corrupt, lying Democrats who want to make rules for us to live by that they themselves are unwilling to follow. Keep raising your Pom-poms for policies that failed all over the world last century.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Thetruth
Fri Sep 7, 2012 7:06 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
L. Brent Bozell and Tim Graham
Oct. `14
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
28 29 30 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31 1
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Authorís Podcast
Patrick Buchanan
Pat BuchananUpdated 31 Oct 2014
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 31 Oct 2014
David Limbaugh
David LimbaughUpdated 31 Oct 2014

16 Apr 2010 Critics of Little Faith

11 Jun 2008 A Complete Hillary Whitewash

8 Jan 2014 The Liberal 'Least Productive' Complaint