opinion web
Liberal Opinion General Opinion
Brent Bozell
L. Brent Bozell
10 Feb 2016
The Media's Softness for Sanders and Socialism

At the start of the Democratic presidential race, the media viewed the contest as a cakewalk. The … Read More.

5 Feb 2016
White Rapper Confesses 'White Privilege'

Macklemore is the stage name of a white rapper from Seattle named Ben Haggerty. He and his publicists are … Read More.

3 Feb 2016
Iowa Ruins the 'Inevitable'

The results in the Iowa caucuses are a rebuke to the notion that the national media have all the influence … Read More.

Putting the Bull in ‘Bully'


In 1968, the Motion Picture Association of America effectively nationalized the movie industry's rating system to guide parents and the wider public about the content of films before purchasing tickets. A year hasn't gone by since that the "beautiful people" don't throw their artistic temper tantrums when they receive a harsher rating than they want.

The latest example is a documentary named "Bully," which investigates the lives of five bullied students during the 2009-2010 school year in five states — Georgia, Mississippi, Iowa, Texas and Oklahoma. Two of the five committed suicide. The filmmaker is basing his whole publicity campaign on shock and outrage for receiving an R rating for six uses of the F-bomb, as well as other vulgar threats.

Lee Hirsch has been all over television and has aligned a parade of liberal celebrities (with Ellen DeGeneres as grand marshal) to demand this politically correct movie is far too important — too important! — to require a parent to accompany a child to the cineplex.

Hirsch has been leading a dishonest campaign suggesting that an R rating means children under 17 are barred from the theater, period. Hirsch complained on "CBS This Morning" that the MPAA is saying "that kids can't see a movie that's about them." He sent one of the bullied kids that starred in the movie (Alex Libby of Sioux City, Iowa) to the MPAA with Weinstein so he could ask the loaded (and inaccurate and dishonest) question: "You mean I can't even see my own life?"

What's so disingenuous about this is that Hirsch is insisting that it's cruel for the MPAA to insist on edits of his bullied victims' lives. Hirsch obviously edited months of their lives down to 98 minutes to prepare his film.

And if during that editing process, Hirsch had extracted just a handful of words, there would be no controversy. But then, there'd be no publicity, either.

Always beware an "artist" who says the way he's assembled the facts is "honest" and removing three F-bombs or whatever else the MPAA objects to is somehow "dishonest." Hirsch told NPR "the issue is that it has to sort of be seen in a way that's honest. And if we whitewash these experiences again, we're sort of back into that landscape of minimizing the experience of bullying, making it more palatable." So the MPAA is somehow showing favoritism to bullying unless it relents?

Well, yes.

On the film's website, Hirsch even casts the MPAA as bullies: "Don't let the MPAA bullies win," they say in promoting signatures to a petition demanding the movie's R rating be softened to PG-13. Hirsch's poster girl for this petition is Katy Butler, a 17-year-old lesbian activist, who naturally thinks to limit this film is life-threatening. She laments, "I can't believe the MPAA is blocking millions of teenagers from seeing a movie that could change — and, in some cases, save — their lives." You've got to love 17-year-old lesbian activists.

There's the lie again — the MPAA isn't "blocking" teenagers from seeing it by giving it an R rating. They're insisting parents come along. It's about the last act of responsibility left in that industry. But liberal lawyer David Boies is threatening a lawsuit to protest the film "being censored by a rating system that has got simply no rational basis."

The grand prize for incoherence in this controversy goes to the industry front group "Common Sense Media." Its CEO, James Steyer, told the press, "The MPAA is proving to be the real bully in the ratings fight over this film. They continue to demonstrate that their ratings system is simply inadequate when it comes looking at a movie's content through the lens of its larger thematic issues."

But go to the group's website, and the movie review insists, "Bully's most challenging material isn't just the language but the suicides. Seeing grieving parents and friends could potentially be upsetting to teens and preteens, so they should definitely watch with adults."

The MPAA system today is loaded in favor of the filmmakers. If producers feel the MPAA is too harsh with their rating, they can lobby and protest, and often they have won. But if the viewing public finds a film's rating to be too relaxed, they have no recourse. As the Parents Television Council puts it, "their frustration almost always comes after they have been assaulted with content they were not expecting."

If "Bully" were truly the most socially important film of 2012, then the filmmaker should want to double the audience by insisting parents accompany their children. It makes no sense for him to argue the movie is so crucial that it must be seen by unaccompanied children.

L. Brent Bozell III is the president of the Media Research Center. To find out more about Brent Bozell III, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at



2 Comments | Post Comment
Typical conservative fool, instead of worrying about the F word, which I thnk everyone hears every day about as much as that horrible vulgar slur, LIBERAL, you should worry about the bullying that is terrorizing these kids. Too bad that wasn't the thrust of your article. Instead of railing about the tragedy of Matthew Shephard you were running around complaining about gay rights. That is the problem, you just don't get it....
I could care less about the F word, I do care about a kid that will kill himself rather than be tormented. I haven't seen this movie and I have no opinion, but the born again whack jobs are always trying to censor everyone else. If they don't want their kids seeing a movie, guess what, don't let them go. Chances are they will see it anyway at some normal kids house, that always happens, you can't stop free thought, no matter how much you and your ilk try.
The conservative mantra: SCREW YOU, I'VE GOT MINE
Comment: #1
Posted by: Bloom Hilda
Sat Mar 24, 2012 6:08 AM
I am a conservative, and I see nothing political about the movie. To me your opinion poses a question in my mind if you have children, or if you are so out of touch with the declining morals in this country. The morals that would have us know better than to join in a gang where we brutalize kids every day. Your article is so off base from the issue at hand. I will stand up for this cause, not just because I believe in education, but because I believe in taking care of ALL children, we are paving a better way for OUR future. I will stand beside liberals and conservatives, because it doesn't matter our view of politics, it only matters in our view of mankind.
Comment: #2
Posted by: HG
Sat Mar 31, 2012 6:00 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right: comments policy
L. Brent Bozell and Tim Graham
Feb. `16
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 1 2 3 4 5
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Linda Chavez
Linda ChavezUpdated 12 Feb 2016
David Limbaugh
David LimbaughUpdated 12 Feb 2016
Patrick Buchanan
Pat BuchananUpdated 12 Feb 2016

26 May 2010 Preposterous Bill Press

4 Apr 2013 Farewell to Hollywood's Favorite Bureaucrat

11 Jan 2008 Lifetime Pushes "Naked" Makeovers