creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion General Opinion
Brent Bozell
L. Brent Bozell
22 Oct 2014
Paul Krugman's Late Obama Valentine

Knowing the way our political press works, it's easy to predict that Barack Obama's presidency is just about over.… Read More.

17 Oct 2014
CBS Drives Away 'Anti-Gay' Catholics

While the cultural commissars keep throwing praise and awards at raunchy shows on trendy Internet streaming channels,… Read More.

15 Oct 2014
Time for Conservative Cultural Surrender?

On Oct. 12, the Sunday edition of The Washington Post reported their "Election Lab" estimate that the … Read More.

Fox Television's Dung Pile

Comment

The Federal Communications Commission is assigned the duty of enforcing broadcast decency provisions of the Communications Act of 1934. But Barack Obama's FCC seems to think the indecency-discouraging mission of the FCC is as outdated as Glenn Miller, even as the airwaves sound more like Ozzy Osbourne.

FCC chairman Julius Genachowski is an aggressive regulator, thumbing his nose at a recent court decision that underlined he has no statutory authority for his power lust to rein in Internet service providers. Feeling no need to wait for a Democratic Congress to grant him that authority, Genachowski is planning to reclassify broadband providers as telecommunications companies so he can gain new powers to "protect consumers" and "save" the World Wide Web.

Meanwhile, indecency on the broader band of broadcast TV — which Genachowski is bound by law to enforce — is being utterly ignored. Seth MacFarlane, the super-wealthy spoiled man-child of Fox Entertainment, has clearly read the tea leaves and is flaunting the FCC directly.

"Material is indecent if, in context, it depicts or describes sexual or excretory organs or activities in terms patently offensive as measured by contemporary community standards for the broadcast medium." That's the official definition of indecency.

And that would certainly describe the stomach-churning May 2 episode of Fox's "Family Guy," starring Brian, the sophisticated, deep-voiced talking family dog, along with Stewie, the psychotic and effeminate talking baby boy. In this episode, the dog and the baby get trapped in a bank vault, causing the baby to panic and defecate. The baby orders the dog to eat the contents of his diaper. When the dog actually eats the baby feces, the baby vomits and then says, "Got some dessert for you." The dog then eats the vomit. The dog also licked the baby's rear end clean so Stewie could boast to the otherwise empty vault that the dog "French-kissed my bottom clean."

This is a cartoon watched by millions of children on broadcast television at 9 p.m. Many parents have seen the kind of spoiled child who finds a line he's not supposed to cross and then crosses it with bravado, daring anyone to discipline him. Not many have seen this bratty behavior from a grown man at the age of 36. Fox Entertainment reportedly pays this man $100 million to poison the culture.

Where is the FCC chairman in "protecting consumers" and "saving" television on this matter? Where do people go to demand that conglomerates like Fox Entertainment are not acting in the public interest?

It would be hard to imagine — but not impossible, sadly — how any government bureaucrat at the FCC could argue that this does not depict excretory activities in a patently offensive manner by contemporary community standards.

The last I checked, eating feces had not yet gained mainstream acceptance. This episode was so disgusting that even sleazy gossip Perez Hilton blogged that he had to turn the program off.

When it comes to indecency, nobody's home at the FCC.

MacFarlane keeps placing prank calls. Back in January, an episode of MacFarlane's "American Dad" cartoon demonstrated its creator's ongoing fascination with horse sperm. (Previously and infamously on "Family Guy," baby Stewie ate horse sperm for breakfast, with full knowledge of what it was.) Stan Smith, the doltish CIA agent and title character of "American Dad," was tricked into masturbating a racehorse to improve its performance. Viewers next saw Stan being showered with liquid, which turned out to be water from a garden hose as he washed himself off in disgust after he'd performed this supposedly hilarious deed.

We can have overtly sexual activities, with animals, no less, and the FCC can't be bothered.

Should MacFarlane be ignored? Someone who churns out this kind of "comedy" surely craves attention. He now has three half-hour shows on Fox every Sunday night, all vigorously lunging to offend. If MacFarlane plays with baby feces in the woods, does anyone see it? Sadly, yes: This sorry hour-long episode of "Family Guy" was watched by 7.3 million people, tying ABC's "Desperate Housewives" for first place.

But Genachowski's FCC is much more interested in high-tech matters like affordable broadband access and fuzzyheaded conferences on the "future of media," making the media more friendly for Obama's hope-and-change agenda. Even the commission's Enforcement Bureau isn't interested in indecency. It's announcing how important it is that the regulators are "ensuring that individuals with hearing disabilities can fully utilize wireless phone services."

In January, Michelle Obama bragged to People magazine that her daughters only get to watch TV on weekends, and are limited to Nickelodeon and the Disney Channel. "They can only watch the kid-TV channels for the most part, because you just never know," declared Mrs. Obama. She would not have to worry if her husband's FCC chairman was doing his job.

L. Brent Bozell III is the president of the Media Research Center. To find out more about Brent Bozell III, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM



Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment
If you don't like the program why not do the responsible thing and shut it off. Now I know you've also talked about children, but shouldn't it be the parents who are monitoring and controlling the things their children watch? You seem to bring up that these shows should be censored or taken off the air and rarely do you seem to call children watching this trash what it is, a failure of parenting. Why do you tend to absolve these lousy parents of their responsibilities?
Comment: #1
Posted by: Beetle717
Mon May 10, 2010 8:14 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
L. Brent Bozell and Tim Graham
Oct. `14
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
28 29 30 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31 1
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Authorís Podcast
Laura Hollis
Laura HollisUpdated 23 Oct 2014
Matt Towery
Matt ToweryUpdated 23 Oct 2014
Deb Saunders
Debra J. SaundersUpdated 23 Oct 2014

25 Feb 2011 Not Wrestling Girls

5 Mar 2010 A Year of Anti-Religious Bigotry

26 Sep 2014 Jay Carney's Pinocchio Problem