creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion General Opinion
Austin Bay
Austin Bay
27 Aug 2014
Vladimir Putin: The Return of the CommuNazi

In August 1939 — 75 years ago this week — Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin signed the Hitler-… Read More.

20 Aug 2014
The Allies Invade Southern France: Seaports and a Race up the Rhone

Winston Churchill disparaged Operation Anvil-Dragoon, the Aug. 15, 1944 Allied "second D-Day" invasion of … Read More.

14 Aug 2014
Islamic State's Murderous Excess Is The Road To Its Demise

The terror gang now known as the Islamic State planned and executed an astonishingly successful military and … Read More.

The Taliban's Killing Fields: History 2014?

Comment

In the wake of the murder of 16 innocent Afghan civilians, slain by a lone American soldier, the Afghan government is asking the Obama administration to do two things.

The first request should surprise no one. The Afghanis want America to bring the mass murderer to justice, and do so quickly. An open, transparent investigation and trial, conducted fairly but also swiftly, will forward reconciliation. The death penalty must be considered and, if the murderer is convicted, it must be imposed.

The second request, however, is even more morally sobering. It is also more difficult to execute, which means fulfilling it requires steadfast international leadership by President Barack Obama. The Afghan government wants the U.S. and NATO to avoid a rapid and precipitous withdrawal, for it would undercut 10 years of effort and all but certainly restore the Taliban's homicidal regime.

Mass murder lies behind this second request — the prevention of mass murder, on a genocidal scale. Following America's Vietnam retreat, Cambodia's unrestrained communist potentate, Pol Pot, slaughtered 2 million Cambodian civilians. The body count left following a Taliban restoration could rival Pol Pot's genocide.

Avoiding Afghani killing fields requires a firm commitment by the Obama administration to create certain minimum conditions before the U.S. departs the country.

At one time, Barack Obama knew what those minimum conditions are. Candidate Obama called Iraq the wrong war and implied Afghanistan was the right one. Obama said, "Only a comprehensive strategy that prioritizes Afghanistan and the fight against al-Qaida will succeed, and that's the change I'll bring to the White House." President Obama's 2009 policy study concluded that disrupting and defeating al-Qaida meant the U.S. had to promote "a more capable, accountable and effective" Afghan government, build "increasingly self reliant" Afghan security forces, support civilian constitutional government in Pakistan and pursue these goals with U.N. and international support.

Obama's fine words described necessary conditions to achieve vital goals.

However, he undermined his own condition-based goals with a politically convenient time scheme: The U.S. would begin to "transition" from Afghanistan in 2011 with 2014, to use Joe Biden's now sad phrase (November 2010), a "drop-dead date" for withdrawal.

Nothing like telling the enemy, "Hey, just hang on and we're gone." This from the people who touted "smart diplomacy."

Obama is cutting troop levels and reducing spending. Little wonder the Taliban, their Pakistani supporters and, for that matter, many Afghanis who do support the U.S. and NATO mission believe Obama is preparing to desert Afghanistan in 2014.

Perhaps he is. More likely, he doesn't know. The withdrawal timetable was a 2012 election gimmick designed to pre-empt criticism from Vietnam-syndrome "antiwar" Democrats. The March 2012 massacre, however, has ignited cries for immediate retreat and abandonment.

We heard this in 2004, with the Abu Ghraib prisoner abuse scandal — a rough equivalent to 2012's massacre. Abu Ghraib involved a dozen soldiers, not a lone actor, but then no one was murdered at Abu Ghraib. The scandal harmed the U.S. effort in Iraq, for it shook Iraqi confidence in America's moral commitment to build a just society governed by the rule of law. The Bush administration court-martialed the criminals and continued with the mission. President George W. Bush, in particular, never wavered in his personal commitment to the Iraq mission. And America's friends and enemies knew he meant it.

The March massacre gives Obama the opportunity to demonstrate he has comparable grit. Obama claims the U.S. will withdraw "responsibly," which is a fine word, and the U.S. will meet its "objectives," another good word. Deeds, however, must support the words. Halting or reducing 2012's planned troop withdrawals, in consultation with the Afghan government, would demonstrate that he is willing to sacrifice personal political needs to addressing changing battlefield conditions.

Democrats, to include Obama, reaped tactical political benefit from a mean little ditty about George Bush and Iraq. "Bush lied, people died" was the phrase. Should the Taliban return, a far crueler and more accurate doggerel will brand the Obama administration's legacy: "Obama fled — and left our Afghan allies for dead."

To find out more about Austin Bay, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2012 CREATORS.COM



Comments

3 Comments | Post Comment
This time Austin's comments almost caused me a heart attack. Trying to justify continued killing of Americans in Afganistan on the basis of preventing mass-murder by the Taliban and/or AQ. While mass murders are regrettable and even worse, they have been around for years and are not likely to stop just because America dedicates lives to keeping the peace. What about all the other recent mass murders gone unmentioned by America, such s those regularly going on in Africa. America does not have any moral obligation to intervene in any country just to install a 'legitimate' stable, capable, accountable, or effective gvt. My sons & daughters wanted to go down and immediately enlist and volunteer for AfPak upn reading Austin's latest. Hopefully better judgement will take over at some point. Sorry Austin, you 'll have to fight this one yourself. Maybe you can convince y our students to enlist on behalf of Afgan people
Comment: #1
Posted by: tominTX
Thu Mar 15, 2012 7:28 AM
Great - I see you served in Peacetime Germany. Makes you a complete expert on war. We left Vietnam too early ?? You worthlsess piece of sh.t. I served two tours as an infantryman. How much blood and suffering do you want to cause our troops, in order for you worthless Republican Chickenhawks to feel like real men.
Look at the history of Afganastan over the last centuries. A little longer will make no difference.
GET OUT NOW
Comment: #2
Posted by: John Pfaendtner
Fri Mar 16, 2012 8:51 AM
Sorry, I deny both requests. When and if the bastards who murdered the American troops who trained them are brought to justice with a transparent trial, blah blah blah, and the death penalty imposed; when and if the bastards who murdered our boys in retaliation for burning a few Koran books which were used to carry messages to betray and help murder Americans who were there only to help; when they are brought to trial and the death penalty imposed, then we can talk about what this lone p'd off American soldier may or may not be charged with.


If Afghanistan wants us to stay, they should pay us. The Pentagon and American geologists discovered in 2010 that there is a host of wealth beneath that country. Afghanistan's resources could make it the richest mining region on earth. Extensive deposits of barite, chromite, coal, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, natural gas, petroleum, precious and semiprecious stones, salt, sulfur, talc, and zinc; precious and semiprecious stones include high-quality emerald, lapis lazuli, red garnet and ruby are in the dirt beneath their feet and the rugged terrain covered with the spilled blood of Americans.


So, don't talk to me about Justice, Don't tell me Afghanistan is a poor country. Don't cry to me that the people will be overrun and innocent lives will be lost. That's already happening and those innocent lives belong to Americans. Afghanistan's history is a war-lord nation. It is not Vietnam or Cambodia.
They won't go the same way the American Indian went. Get out NOW!
Comment: #3
Posted by: demecra zydeem
Sat Mar 17, 2012 1:45 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Austin Bay
Aug. `14
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Authorís Podcast
Walter Williams
Walter E. WilliamsUpdated 3 Sep 2014
Thomas Sowell
Thomas SowellUpdated 2 Sep 2014
Deb Saunders
Debra J. SaundersUpdated 31 Aug 2014

18 Mar 2009 Flash Mobs, Tea Parties and Tocqueville

22 May 2013 System D: Floating Economic Boats Beneath the Surface

27 Nov 2013 Trust But Verify: Missing in 2013