Conservative> Austin Bay> Holiday Greeting S From Iran Grim Cynical And Desperate

	23 May 2012 Greece: Mulligan Election, Mulligan Economy Greece wants two mulligans — like a golfer demanding second chance, a do-over tee shot, times two. The … Read More.
	16 May 2012 Chicago Summit: Showcase for a 21st Century NATO? The last two decades have demonstrated that NATO's post-Cold War death notices reprised a classic Mark Twain one-liner.… Read More.
	9 May 2012 China's Dilemma: Berlin Transition or Tiananmen Destruction? The 23-year-old photograph is a stunning record of Chinese courage past and an insight into China's present … Read More.

Holiday Greeting's From Iran: Grim, Cynical and Desperate

Iran's tyrannical regime has sent the world what passes for a holiday greeting in contemporary Tehran — a grim and cynical threat.

This week, a member of Iran's National Security Committee intimated that Iran would soon demonstrate that it could close the Strait of Hormuz to oil tanker traffic. Paryiz Saryari, a member of Iran's sham parliament, added this bit of rhetorical fire: "If the world wants to make the region (i.e., Iran) insecure, we will make the world insecure."

The Strait of Hormuz connects the oil-rich Persian Gulf region to the Gulf of Oman and the Indian Ocean. Closing the Strait to shipping effectively imposes a naval blockade on the Arab states along the Gulf's littoral. That's grim, for it amounts to waging war on several US allies, including Iraq and Saudi Arabia.

It gets grimmer. On any given day, some 30 percent of the globe's seaborne oil supply sails through the geographic choke-point; thus closing the Strait threatens international energy security.

Missiles and mines bolster Saryari's bombast. Iran possesses sufficient military forces to seal the channel. Anti-ship mines, high-speed anti-ship missiles and torpedoes pose the biggest problems. Iran also has a few submarines. Strikes by suicide aircraft and swarm attacks by suicide speedboats are possible.

Yes, this is a grim scenario, and in the looming future grimmer still, once Iran's Khomeinist despots possess nuclear weapons — which they don't, not yet ... we hope.

Cynics argue that the ayatollahs' cynicism, which is as amply evident as is their corruption, will keep Hormuz open. Immediately following Saryari's threat, world oil prices spiked three to four dollars. Iranian government oil traders, given a heads-up that the verbal threat was coming, could have made millions, with the cash lining a Revolutionary Guard officer's pocket, or an ayatollah's robe, or going into an account to illicitly purchase nuclear weapon detonators.

An uncertain logic undergirds this cynical read.

The ayatollahs know that actually closing the strait amounts to a self-blockade. Iran's major oil-exporting seaports lie on the Persian Gulf (e.g., Kharg Island). The regime buys what domestic peace it enjoys with oil money. Choke the strait, and the ayatollahs strangle themselves. So they won't do it, if economic logic overrides theological millenarianism.

Economic logic, however, does not guide the ayatollahs' nuclear quest. If they ditched their nukes, sanctions would end and the threat of U.S. or Israeli attack would drastically diminish. Yet the centrifuges continue to spin; so do threats to annihilate Israel. Last month, Iran threatened to attack missile defense radar sites in Turkey.

The grim consequences of closing Hormuz are why Western and Persian Gulf Arab militaries are prepared to defend the strait, break any Iranian blockade and clear the strait of mines.

The grim consequences of Iran's regime acquiring nuclear weapons are why U.S. spy drones scrutinize Iranian nuclear facilities and why mysterious bomb blasts (Mossad at work?) plague Iranian labs. It appears the Obama administration has finally understood that negotiations and sanctions won't halt the quest and that the Bush administration was right — the ayatollahs are hellbent on nukes. So the Obama Administration has decided to wage a covert war on Iranian nuclear capabilities.

That alone, however, does not explain the desperate quality of Iran's recent belligerency. Domestically, the regime survives by threatening its people with its street thugs and secret police. Syria's dictatorship (an Iranian ally) has failed to crush its rebels with these brutal tools.

That seeds desperation in Tehran, but Tunisia may be a bigger source of concern.

As Hussein Ibish noted at NOWLebanon.com, recent "bickering" among Tunisian parliamentarians was delightful because "there was no monarch, no dictatorship, no junta or oppressive military, no killings, no militias, no riots and no hint of civil conflict, foreign interference or invasion" present. Another democracy is emerging in a culturallyIslamic society. It's fragile, but for Iran's tyrants, it is to be feared.

To find out more about Austin Bay, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.