Sunday, July 06, 2008 | 9:58 a.m.

The Hooker Next Door

by Froma Harrop

The tale of the 22-year-old prostitute frequented by former New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer dredges up an awkward memory. I once shared an apartment — it now amazes me to say — with a call girl who brought her johns home.

Let me explain.

While in my 20s, I advertised for a non-smoker to split the costs of my two-bedroom Manhattan apartment. The most attractive respondent was a young woman I'll call Claire. Friendly and polite, she had solid job at a midtown corporation. ...

( Back to Article )

Join the Discussion

1 Comments | Post Comment
Posted by: David
Comment: #1
Wed Mar 19, 2008 6:02 PM

Hi Froma, It's Leap Year, so I guess you think you can make leaps in logic. I'm referring to your "Sex sadly for sale everywhere" piece. How do you know for sure that Claire was a prostitute? Maybe she was simply more sexually adventurous than you. Maybe she preferred to have multiple partners. Maybe the money that you witnessed being exchanged was repayment of a loan, or for a dinner that Claire paid for that he promised to pay back, or for drugs, or any number of other things. It saddens me (your word) that even today men are called studs for scoring a lot of women, and women are labeled whores for doing the same thing. It's pathetic enough when men make these judgments, but for women to do it to each other - I don't get it. You must really think a lot of yourself to stand in judgment of another human being, to kick them out of their home, based on no evidence, without even giving them a chance to explain: "When Claire returned, I asked her to leave without elaborating. I'm sure Claire knew the reason, but she nonetheless seemed hurt." She didn't just SEEM hurt, she WAS hurt, probably because she didn't know the reason she was being evicted. Froma, have you met anyone who can read minds? I haven't. Perhaps you should have said your thoughts out loud. I'm very relieved that you became a journalist rather than a judge. You'd be terrible at it. If you had been the judge of the Duke Lacrosse case, the defendants wouldn't have been allowed to explain their side of the story.

Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:
Creators.com comments policy
 

Sunday, July 06, 2008 | 9:58 a.m.
About Creators | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | Editor's login | FAQ
Copyright © 2006 Creators.com. All Rights Reserved.
Web Development by JJCO