Comments

Reply
Report this post

Amazing that Newt Gingrich is suddenly this prophetic, mature, down-to-earth guy in your eyes, Conason. Remember the 1994 Republican Revolution that he led in Congress? Back then he was an "extremist," a cold-hearted thug trying to take food from the mouths of hungry schoolchildren (as Dick Gephardt intoned.). Remember "How the Gingrich stole Christmas?" Now you're sitting here telling us that RINO pro-abortion, pro-card-check, Democrat-lite DeDe ScoffLaw is what Republican voters really wanted. I also noticed you aren't particularly interested in the fact that the Democrat Party got their heads handed to them in Virginia and New Jersey last night, or that gay marriage lost its 31st popular vote, or the utter embarrassment and setback this represents for the Obama Administration - much less how it's going to be a harbinger of utter and total defeat of the Democrat Party at the polls next year. No, instead you crow about a single congressional race electing a moderate Democrat for a ONE YEAR term by a three point margin in a three-way-race. Hang it up.

Reply
Report this post

Please! Where did this Conason guy come from? How did he gain his expertise? This writing is worse than drivel. At least drivel at times rises to a level which makes sense. How can a guy with any intelligence condemn Hoffman as a "carpetbagger" and still be a supporter of Hilary Clinton? And, of course, Newt Gingerich is correct now that he has slid far to the left, but he was dead wrong in 1994. This Conason guy is about as logical as Elmer Fudd. I expect him to yell "Kill the wabbit" in his next diatribe. I sometimes give liberals a chance to pontificate just to assure myself that my supposed "far right" opinions are correct. This stunted intellect validates the condemnation of liberals as lock-step lemmings like no other writer. Wow! No wonder they have mired us in the most toxic downward spiral in the history of the country.

Reply
Report this post

Newt isn't a consevative, liberal, moderate, libertarian, or anything. Newt's stance on nearly everything blows with the political wind. The only thing Newt stands for is...come to think of it he may not even stand for that.

Reply
Report this post

Hey Joey, Who must you be?....David Corn's cousin?? LOL! Seriously, this twisted psychotic spin is worthy of his mindnumbing illness where it's obviously contagious. There's nothing “moderate” about Scuzzafufu. The only people we know who are more treasonous in their policies and positions are the Comrade In Chief, his Czars and the Politburo who were previously known as the United States Congress. Therefore, your laughable attempt to throw that monicker on her is pathetic. We know why you're drooling and you will pay the price sooner or later. Care to bet on whether it's sooner??

Reply
Report this post

This is ridiculous. I am assuming that you were not at the 9/12 rally in D.C. If you were, you would have seen hundreds of thousands, yes, you heard me right - hundreds of thousands of freedom-loving patriots. I brought my children. Everyone was kind and friendly, it was a great rally. I know you want to paint us as hateful and racist, but that is just untrue. I have been to countless rallies with families, older couples, young adults - diverse age, race and social status. None of that mattered, we were all there to support one cause. Too bad that Newt does not understand that regardless of your party, no American should follow any political group blindly. There is nothing wrong with asking questions when things seem amiss. The woman in NY was not a Republican, she was running as if she were, but her stances were clearly not. This is why she was rejected by the Tea Partiers. We are trying to bring the Republicans back to their conservative roots, where they belong. Would you be happy with your party if they ran someone with conservative values as if they were a Democrat? I didn't think so... You have demonstrated with your article that you are as in the dark as Mr. Gingrich when it comes to what is brewing in this country. You have also demonstrated your own predjudice against an entire group of people you disagree with, you would sound more credible if you did not resort to name calling. But, if that makes you feel better, then do what you have to do. Maybe you will understand more about the Tea Parties on Judgement Day 2010 ;)

Reply
Report this post

Blah blah. Doesn't matter if you big heads get it, a storm is brewing, and the conservatives will be...(oh dear) conservative. We will not vote for the "poor"scozzafava-type liberals with a Republican T-shirt in their closet. Games up, political correctness loses, we will not be intimidated by your disapproval.

Reply
Report this post

Wow! I read this article b/c it was sent to me by Creators, Inc., and now I have to ask, who does this Conason idiot know who gave him a license and a job so he could be published? Obviously he didn't make it on his knowledge, wit, or talent! I have little reason to believe that Newt gives any credence what-so-ever, nor is he even remotely concerned about, what this Conason moron has to say about anything. Newt is more likely proud of the way things are turning out - can't help but give Kudos to the Dems for this! - and proud as well of the notion he is well identified with those who are being scapegoated by this liberal drivel! Why is Newt scarred? Perhaps he sees the writing on the wall and is merely conflicted as to how to "inform" the citizens of America what is really in store for them! Maybe he doesn't want to let the cat out of the bag! Lots of PS3s were bought with the stim-bill money and all one has to do to learn what goes on in the minds of those who bought them is visit the PS3 virtual mall! Which not only speaks volumes but is way too funny! Maybe Newt honestly feels what's in the heart of serious citizens and wants to "marginalize" what that is. Obviously messengers are still killed today but the jig is up, it's too late Creators dot com, and publishing this guy Conason only proves that you know it, too! lmao!!