creators.com web

Comments

3 Comments | Post Comment
The problem I have with the futures on Oil is that our government has regulated the limiting of supply. I have heard that 401Ks are investing in these futures as well as massive number of other people. As long as the government is able to regulate a limitation on supply of Oil then we have a conflict of interest. Who is going to fight to have these regulations removed? If you say the Republicans, maybe a couple might really want to but my guess is any real bill to remove the regulations will get riders on them to stop any chance of them going through.
I think the regulations of limiting supply are criminal. As long as futures are allowed then there will be more incentive to have the regulations remain by those who have invested this direction. We need a list of all congressional personnel that have investments in Oil futures or in companies that are heavily invested in Oil futures.
Comment: #1
Posted by: mike
Thu Jul 10, 2008 11:13 AM
"What would lower the long-term price of oil is for Congress to permit exploration for the estimated billions upon billions of barrels of oil domestically available, not to mention the estimated trillion-plus barrels of shale oil in Wyoming, Colorado and Utah."
But don't the oil companies already own (lease the rights to) huge swaths of off-shore areas that are just sitting there? With oil at current prices, why not start with using that oil?
Comment: #2
Posted by: SLEZE
Thu Jul 10, 2008 11:50 AM
Those leases are sitting there waiting for Court litigation to allow the Oil Companies to proceed. That is another of Congresses dirty little secrets.
Comment: #3
Posted by: David J
Thu Aug 7, 2008 10:49 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy