Join the Discussion

Reply
Report this post

For the life of me I just can't understand why anyone is beleivingany of the "global warming" nonsense in the first place??? All of the THEORIES on global warming are based on the THEORY of a world & universe billions of years old. As of this day, their has not been one single bit of evidence to prove that THIS earth is any more than approximately 10,000 years old, not a single bit if imperical evidence. The earth is spinning, like a top, & is loosing speed, that is true & provable, BUT if the earth is slowing down, THEN that means the earth was spinning faster. I don't want to make this too difficult to understand. NOW find a good mathematicion & extropulate the numbers backwards & then u will know that if u go very far back in time to when the earth was spinning faster, you should be able to figure out that several billion years ago, EVERYONE & EVERYTHING WOULD HAVE BEEN HURTLED INTO SPACE & NOTHING WOULD BE HERE TODAY. But that is only one of the many arguments against a billion year old anything. Why is it that not many columnists ever write about any of the things that PROVE global warming is a scare tactic & is only being used 2 alarm citizens & create a lot of government agencies around the world that are not accountable to the constituency, as always every governemnt will need to raise taxes in order to combat something that does not exist?? Where is this outrage being written about, people like me that didn't go to harvard or yale don't have the voice to be heard & when ANYONE CRITISIZES the "chosen few" that keep repeating all this crap, we are attacked. Not one bit of evidence is ever contradicted, the "debate" or whatever u want to call a controlled meeting & discussion, those presenting different possibilities are ignored or discredited, or their comments are deleted from the minutes of the said meeting. I can understand that some people don't understand much of this argument, BUT if u are going to be making comments & stating your opinion, then YOU should be able to know the difference between a good hypothesis & a good lie, so far all that I have read from the proponents of global warming are lies. But then again I don't have your "voice" & I don't know how much time you have to read all the literature that I have. I've been reading for nearly 60 yrs at a rate of over 1000 WPM with nearly 90% retention. I'm not bragging, but that was the rate that i read the last time i was tested.