|
Sir;...You are sort of mixing your metaphors when you link Socialism with Serfdom; so let me help you with that... We already have too much Socialism like public hospitals, republican government, public education, public highways and streets, and God forbid: Social Security... We, meaning the rich, cannot afford it....But Serfdom has never been the consequence of Socialism...The Chinese broke free of feudalism the moment they became Socialistic... But even under Feudalism the grunts had rights, and in many respects, moving into Capitalism, the working people lost rights...The poor had inheritable property rights under Feudalism, and never knew wide spread poverty until the commons were lifted from them against their will, and consent... I would embrace Feudalism at any point compared to the rights we have under Capitalism, because our rights are civil, but meaningless...The only rights that matter make one man superior to another, and only property rights can do that.... So; that is the Socialism we should have, with government protecting and enforcing the rights of Property, and binding the population in perpetual servitude to Property... It is National Socialism you look for....Industrial Feudalism by another name...Real Feudalism gave all classes rights...You do not want that by any means...You want a Commonwealth for the wealthy, and pure savagery for the poor..Let them tear their guts out for a crumb....Let them kill each other for a dollar...There is no law the poor will obey, or any law they should obey but the law of survival... Just watch out for them...Don't go slumming, and have your tires go flat.... And you should change a few things about your government...Liberty and Justice for All is far too Socialistic...Liberty and justice for the rich sounds better....And We the People should be changed to -We the Rich People....Do you get my drift???There is no reason anyone should get any ideas about justice or liberty or equality...God may have made men equal; but money makes them unequal; which means that only the Godly are free to correct God in his errors... What should it matter to the pure of heart if the whole of mankind is reduced to a primitive existence???Why should humanity not be made to devolve into monkeys...Is that not the object of our Constitution, our Government, our Laws, and our Economy???Is it not to make monkeys of men and of mankind??? That has been the result...Who can say it was not always its purpose???...Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #1
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Thu Jan 22, 2009 3:52 PM
|
|
|