creators home
creators.com lifestyle web

Recently

Does Sex Entitle You to Anything? Catch 37 recently wrote in. She'd been dating and sleeping with a guy for two months. He seems to love everything about her, including how "easygoing" she is. The problem is she's not as easygoing as he thinks she is. He'll call several …Read more. Do You Take This Man -- and His Mother and Her Three Husbands -- to be Your Husband? Nobody comes to a relationship with a clean slate. We're all products of our past relationships, those of our parents and our grandparents, etc. Take Courtney and Tommy for example. Tommy's mother, Crystal, was married to Tommy's father, John. When …Read more. It Really Is the Thought That Counts Anybody can give chocolates and roses for Valentine's Day, but let's hear it for the guys with the nerve to give pliers, an oven mitt or a bottle of bubbles. SALLY: For our first Valentine's Day, my husband gave me a "corn cob" toilet …Read more. Single Mom Needs Security in New Relationship Dear Cheryl, I'm 37 and I have two kids. I've been dating this guy for two months. I really like him, and I think he likes me. When we're together, everything is great. We're so in sync, it's scary. We have the same opinions on food, music, movies, …Read more.
more articles

Get Out of Jail Free Just One of the Perks of Fame

Share Comment

What makes the leader of the free world think he can have an affair with an intern in the Oval Office and no one will find out? What makes a presidential candidate think his aide can claim to be the father of his child and no one will question it?

What makes a governor known for cracking down on prostitution hire prostitutes? What makes the most famous athlete in the world think he can have affairs with dozens of bimbos and not get caught?

What's with these guys?

David thinks he knows.

"Some people have a super power that allows them to have their cake and eat it, too. Usually it comes from some combination of wealth, charm, good looks, political power and/or success in arts, athletics or entertainment.

"We are constantly bombarded with reminders that these things come with all kinds of perks and 'Get Out of Jail Free' cards."

(Sometimes the Get Out of Jail Free cards are real. Just ask O.J. Simpson and Robert Blake. And how many chances did Robert Downey Jr. get to clean up his act?)

"Say I have a staff of professionals whose livelihoods depend on my being appealing and popular. My fixers and polishers earn every penny of their six-figure salaries and are hungry for things they cannot get without making my problems disappear."

(In his book "The Politician," John Edwards' aide, Andrew Young, who was making $300,000 a year, admitted his was totally financially dependent on his boss.)

"Knowing that these people have my back, my bad behavior does not seem so risky any more. And no matter what I say to others or to myself, we all know that the risk of getting caught is always half the fun, so I have to go way overboard to get my thrills."

(That must be the reason why those billionaires are obsessed with sailing hot air balloons around the world!)

"Successful people are driven by new challenges and conquests.

Some of them find contentment in committed marriages, but many of them do not. Some people just need the adrenaline rush that they're unable to find in long-term relationships."

(Calling George Clooney!)

"It may be unfair of these people to promise monogamy. Many of their spouses understand that monogamy would kill their spirits just as surely as remaining unmarried would kill their careers."

(What are the chances of a bachelor becoming president?)

"The super-successful often attract spouses who have no interest in a monogamous partner. When these non-famous spouses finally do leave, it's not because they object to their husband having sex with other women. Rather, it's because the famous person makes it too publicly embarrassing to stay. Just as there's a stigma attached cheating, there's also a stigma attached to tolerating it."

(Hillary Clinton took plenty of flak from feminists from standing by her man, but she had the last laugh. She's secretary of state, and he's the ex-president.)

"No matter how much Tiger Woods may have wanted to stand up in front of God, his family and friends and say, 'I promise to forsake all others as long as I'm within a hundred miles of my wife,' realistic vows are simply not socially acceptable."

Have you let money or success or power go to your head? Send your tale, along with your questions and problems to cheryllavin@aol.com. And check out my blog www.talesfromthefront.com. To find out more about Cheryl Lavin, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM


Comments

2 Comments | Post Comment
I know I'll probably take a lot of flak for this, but I question whether long-term monogamy is natural or normal for people of either sex. At one time a man having several wives was the norm for most of the world, and is still the norm in many places. It's biblical, for heaven's sakes! Before that it was common for a woman to have several husbands, which is still the norm in places like Tibet. I'm told that most Europeans wink at adultery and think it's a good thing for their leader to have a mistress, because that way he has someone to relate to. Today Americans practice a sort of serial monogamy. Even 100 years ago in the Victorian era, "till death us do part" meant an average of only seven years. Is it time to bring our official rhetoric more in line with real lifestyles?
Comment: #1
Posted by: Madelyn
Sun Feb 21, 2010 11:55 AM
Re: Madelyn
I promise not to give you flak, but there are some interesting assumptions in your letter.
"At one time a man having several wives was the norm for most of the world,"
This would not be possible, either economically or mathematically. Unless the man was very wealthy, and thus only a small percentage of the population, he would likely have only one wife. As for the Biblical reference, I'll assume you noticed the instances of polygyny were almost always disastrous, with the poor husband dealing with feuding wives and half-siblings, as well as the expense of keeping them all!
"Before that it was common for a woman to have several husbands, which is still the norm in places like Tibet."
This needs a citation, as I am not familiar with any historical reports of widespread polyandry, other than in a few isolated regions with very harsh living conditions. If you can show me more evidence, I will retract this argument.
"I'm told that most Europeans wink at adultery and think it's a good thing for their leader to have a mistress, because that way he has someone to relate to."
Definitely true in France, but Europe is a rather big place! I doubt the more conservative areas in Europe look upon things so kindly.
"Today Americans practice a sort of serial monogamy." Skewed statistics here. The numbers I am familiar with show 70% of first marriages last until death. However, outliers (such as Mickey Rooney and Elizabeth Taylor) have a disproportionate effect on the percentage of successful "till death do us part" marriages as compared to the total number of marriages. (Math problem: 6 TDDUP marriages plus one serial divorcer that marries/divorces 6 times = 6 TDDUPs in 12 marriages = 2 marriages per couple!)
Finally, I will deal with your main question. Is long term monogamy natural or normal? It's not natural, certainly Our genes drive us to "mix and match", for both males and females. However, our genes also drive us to stuff ourselves with sugar, fat and salt. Natural does not necessarily mean good in the long run. Monogamy certainly isn't normal (as in widespread) either, with many spouses admitting affairs when asked privately (according to Kinsey). However, the couples that manage to stay together despite genetic urges are able to more efficiently pool their resources towards child care (ensuring survival of their genes) than the rovers.
"Is it time to bring our official rhetoric more in line with real lifestyles?" As to your rhetorical question, my answer is no. If anything, I think our genes that provided us with big brains that can do long term planning should finish the job and encourage fidelity as a way of ensuring stability, thus creating an environment where children are more likely to survive.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Snarf
Tue Feb 23, 2010 7:43 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Cheryl Lavin
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month