creators home
creators.com lifestyle web

Recently

Farewell Dear Larry: You are the sanest man in America! I look forward to your columns because I ALWAYS agree with your answers. Great work! Thanks for speaking the simple truth about all issues — racial, political, parental, common sense, etc. I often …Read more. Hate Groups Dear Larry: I want to forget for a moment that it is their constitutional right, because I detest the Ku Klux Klan, neo-Nazis and all other groups that preach hate. A long time ago, they came into cities across America without any protest. Now …Read more. Troubles With Raising Teenage Son Dear Larry: I am African-American and a single mother with three children, ages 15, 10 and 8. All of them are boys. I am having a lot of problems with them, especially the eldest. He argues with me about almost everything. He thinks he is the man/…Read more. How To Get Race Relations Back on Track Dear Larry: So many of my friends are upset with the way things are going, especially race relations. They are not saying anything openly, but among themselves there is constant complaining and fear. There is something simmering and brewing that …Read more.
more articles

ETHNICALLY SPEAKING

Share Comment

Dear Larry: All the uproar about the comments from Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid really concerns me. Sen. Reid said Barack Obama could get elected president because he is light-skinned and lacks a Negro dialect unless he wants to have one.

Larry, I cannot find any real reason for all the fuss, especially because, in my opinion, what he said is a fact. I remember when I was in the military and there was a great amount of picking and choosing among light- and dark-complexioned blacks. The light-skinned blacks were chosen over the dark-skinned blacks.

I agree with Sen. Reid's analysis about the president's complexion. His light skin was an asset, along with his gift to articulate so eloquently. He reminds me a lot of you.

I do not think the senator should step down. It is my opinion Sen. Reid may have unknowingly complimented Obama.

Oh, by the way, I just happen to be a 70-year-old proud black man. What is your take? — Charles

Dear Charles: Thank you for the compliment.

Sen. Reid stated a well-known fact; blacks who are light-skinned and speak without a black dialect are more acceptable to America than dark-skinned blacks with heavy accents. What is ironic is the black community is more color-conscious than the white populace.

The dirty little secret is there is a quiet war over skin color within the black community. All my life I have seen light-skinned blacks sneeringly called "high yellow" by the darker blacks and the lighter ones acting with a superior attitude.

What is at question is Sen.

Reid's usage of the archaic word "Negro." People use words in public they use in private, which includes so-called "slips of the tongue." Sen. Reid is a public official and should be familiar with using politically correct words. Using the word "Negro" is a faux pas. It was a mistake, but not one of any major significance.

My mother, until the day she passed away, refused to call herself or allow anyone to call her black. Negro was her preferred title. She would think Sen. Reid to be a proper gentleman who knows the right words to use.

As an aside, I have a different opinion of former President Bill Clinton's comment. According to the book "Game Change," Bill Clinton — speaking about Obama — told Sen. Ted Kennedy, "A few years ago, this guy would have been getting us coffee."

In my opinion, that is a racist and elitist comment, and Clinton should be condemned. I find his behavior especially egregious and hypocritical because he postures himself as a friend to blacks. I believe he secretly harbors other views.

What I find equally distressing is the lack of outrage by the so-called PC community. The press is silent; the black leaders are mum; and the politicians pretend nothing was said.

This is a perfect example of how people overlook statements made by people they like and scream in outrage at people who do not reflect their political agendas. This is a sad time for truth and fairness.

To find out more about Larry G. Meeks and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM


Comments

5 Comments | Post Comment
A rose by any other name-----------------.
Several of my children are married to blacks. We are white. And, these spouses absolutely hate being called African Americans. They prefer being called Blacks, as they say not all Blacks consider Africa their origin of heritage. I can wholeheartedly agree with them. And, takng their lead, I use the word Black.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Ann Powell
Sun Jan 17, 2010 7:03 AM
Mr. Meeks, I don't see the outrage about Clinton's comment. It was similar to Reid's. Indeed, blacks WERE in subservient positions, even a few years ago. How is that racist and elitist, compared to Reid's comment on skin color and dialect? Both comments were stated as facts (albeit heavyhandedly) by politicians and both comments addressed the perception of and subjegation of blacks by whites. What am I missing? Please clarify.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Barbara E.
Tue Jan 19, 2010 6:28 AM
I too don't get why you think Clinton's comment was racist - elitist perhaps but until President Obama burst onto the stage at the Democratic convention he was a nobody that very few people outside of Illinois (and really, even inside of Illinois) could name.
A number of unique circumstances led to him winning that primary race, that had only a bit to do with charisma and a whole lot to do with the implosion of the other candidates so that the best Illinois could do was bring in Alan Keyes to try and run "black against black".
Until his book was published he had little money, he couldn't have competed with the Kennedy family in clout. So yes, Clinton was totally elitist but not necessarily racist in that remark.
I wouldn't go after Clinton for that remark but neither do I think people should go after Reid, or Biden for that matter (who has made some doozies himself).
Comment: #3
Posted by: Mich
Tue Jan 19, 2010 11:21 AM
Re: Barbara E. Because while you're technically correct, you're being entirely too logical about it. It's not PC to mention that black people used to be slaves or were subservient to whites in any other way. To bring up any of this is considered rude. No one has explained this to you before now?
Comment: #4
Posted by: Matt
Wed Jan 20, 2010 12:36 PM
The other major sticking point here is the SCREAMING double standard. Obama was among those calling for the resignation of Trent Lott, after the man attended Strom Thurmond's birthday party and said that the nation would have been better off if Thurmond's 1948 presidential bid had succeeded. He didn't even mention race, but was run out of Washington at the end of a spear because someone else made the connection that Thurmond at one time had favored segregation. That meant that Lott HAD to be some kind of closet racist. I also found it interesting that Obama took three days to figure out what to say about the guy who tried to blow up a plane on Christmas Day, but managed to respond to Reid's comments within hours. It shows where his priorities are. None of this matters though, as Reid is a loudmouth (not to mention incompetent) and the good people of Nevada are going be throwing him out of office in November. His political career is over, and rightfully so.
Comment: #5
Posted by: Matt
Thu Jan 21, 2010 10:53 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Larry Meeks
Mar. `11
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
27 28 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month