creators home
creators.com lifestyle web

Recently

Hands Are Tied when a Messed-Up Child Is a Legal Adult Dear Annie: My 20-year-old nephew has been a troubled youth, despite all the attempts of his family to help him, including counseling and rehab. When he was 18, he became involved with a messed-up 14-year-old girl who used drugs, alcohol and sex to …Read more. Damaging Favoritism Amid Broken Boundaries Dear Annie: I have two daughters, ages 5 and 2. My in-laws favor the older girl. They buy her more presents, give her more money and pay way more attention to her than to her sister. They almost seem obsessed with her. As soon as she walks in the …Read more. Ex Con on the Straight and Narrow Canned Dear Annie: After eight years at my job, I was let go. I have a felony record. The CEO who knew of my background retired last year. He felt I had proved myself and had no problem with me. When he retired, we got an interim CEO. I told him about my …Read more. Equal Parts Heart Over Equal Parts Money Dear Annie: My husband and I work comparable hours, but I earn less than half of what he does and have little discretionary income. I come home to my "second shift," which includes cooking, cleaning and picking up after this man, who …Read more.
more articles

Annie's Mailbox®, February 7

Share Comment

Dear Annie: My teenage stepdaughter recently moved in with us. Due to her supposed learning disability, her father enrolled her in the local learning center. She went once and hasn't been back. She refuses to attend school, do chores or get a job. She constantly talks back to us. She also lies and steals. She'll tell me her father said one thing and then tell her father I said something else.

She includes herself in our arguments. She does whatever she wants, and her dad allows it. When my husband attempts to punish her, she becomes hostile and throws things at him. He gives up.

It's reached the point where I want to leave. My friends and co-workers have begun to notice that I seem less cheerful and more depressed. Also, my husband has been abusive, both verbally and physically, toward me.

Annie, I don't know how to handle this situation. Help me. — Fed Up

Dear Fed Up: If your husband is physically abusive, you must get out of the house immediately. Sometimes leaving can be dangerous, so you should first contact the National Domestic Violence Hotline (ndvh.org) at 1-877-799-SAFE (1-877-799-7233). Your husband and his daughter need family counseling so they can find ways to help the girl become an independent, functioning member of society. It sounds like they both could use a professional intervention.

Dear Annie: Since the past decade has come to a close, it seems everyone is scrambling to come up with a name for it. When I lived in New Jersey, I heard mention of the “Noughties,” as well as the “Naughty Aughties,” but since I moved to Phoenix, I have not heard any that make sense. What are you and your readers calling this decade? — Confused in Phoenix

Dear Phoenix: “Naughty Aughties” sounds like something from the last century. We've noticed “The Aughts,” “The Oh's” (or the “00s”) and “The Zeros,” but that's mostly in print.

We haven't heard any particular title spoken aloud with any consistency, and we suspect most broadcasters are trying to avoid calling it anything. But it sounds like a good one for our readers to weigh in on. Any ideas?

Dear Annie: This is in response to “Trying To Remain Above Ground,” who objects to people coming into her home without removing their shoes because the dirt and germs they drag in affect her health. She specifically included construction workers in her complaint.

As a contractor, I will tell you that working in any construction site is downright dangerous without proper footwear. Without the support of shoes, working on a ladder is nearly impossible and can lead to disaster. Some tasks, such as taking a measurement inside the home and then going outside to make a cut, become quite time consuming if you have to remove your shoes every time you go inside. I doubt she would like me to set up a saw in her living room.

Most contractors are not trying to be rude. They are just trying to get the job done safely and efficiently. Here are some things the homeowner can do to cut down on the dirt: Remove area rugs and cover the floor with plastic or paper. Inform the contractor BEFORE the start of the project that you have extreme allergies or health issues and all employees will need to bring a second pair of shoes for use inside the home. Make sure the contractor understands that if this requirement cannot be met, the job will be postponed or rescheduled.

P.S.: Just a note for her: Germs enter your home in other ways than the bottom of my feet. — 20 Years of Satisfied Clients

Dear Satisfied: Thanks for the sensible suggestions.

Annie's Mailbox is written by Kathy Mitchell and Marcy Sugar, longtime editors of the Ann Landers column. Please e-mail your questions to anniesmailbox@comcast.net, or write to: Annie's Mailbox, c/o Creators Syndicate, 5777 W. Century Blvd., Ste. 700, Los Angeles, CA 90045. To find out more about Annie's Mailbox and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM


Comments

27 Comments | Post Comment
Contractors might consider slip-on paper or cloth booties, such as are worn at crime scenes.
Comment: #1
Posted by: sarah
Sun Feb 7, 2010 4:27 AM
I notice that LW1 seems to slip in 'My husband is abusive' as if this is an afterthought to the overall leter. She needs to realize that she has become a second-class citizen in her household. Maybe she always was. I know an abusive man who, on top of hitting his wife, would encourage the kids to act like jerks to her - because abuse does not end at hitting. Whether the hitting has been going on all along or whether it just started - it isn't going to get better on its own.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Datura
Sun Feb 7, 2010 6:35 AM
Confused in Phoenix is as confused as at least half the country, because the last decade is NOT over. It takes ten years to make a decade, and we just began year TEN. Why is this so hard for so many people to understand?
Comment: #3
Posted by: Maggie Lawrence
Sun Feb 7, 2010 6:53 AM
Maggie - you are the one who is confused! Count the years:
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
You have to count the year 2000! This is so frustrating to me because I teach middle school math and work SO HARD to make sure my students understand this concept!
Comment: #4
Posted by: swargaski
Sun Feb 7, 2010 7:02 AM
Maggie - you are the one who is confused! Count the years:
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
You have to count the year 2000! This is so frustrating to me because I teach middle school math and work SO HARD to make sure my students understand this concept!
Comment: #5
Posted by: swargaski
Sun Feb 7, 2010 7:06 AM
2000 to 2001=1
2001 to 2002=2
2002 to 2003-3
etc.
2008 to 2009=9
2009 to 2010=10 notice it stops at 2010 does not include it.
just a visual to help out.
Comment: #6
Posted by: Penny
Sun Feb 7, 2010 7:18 AM
Re: Penny & Swargaski
Maggie Lawrence is correct. There was no Year 0 (Zero), so the first decade was 1 - 10, and the most recent is 2001 - 2010 (inclusive). Conversely, a person's first year in Anglo-American and European cultures is Year 0, so the first decade would be 0 - 9.
But saying that, I will sit on the fence, as I do prefer the decades to have the same beginning digit. :-)
Comment: #7
Posted by: Miss Pasko
Sun Feb 7, 2010 7:57 AM
I call it "turn of the millenium". It may not be snappy-catchy like a slogan, but 1900-1910 was called "turn of the century", so that should be good enough. Politicos might want to call it the 9-11 decade, but in my opinion 9-11 was bad enough without giving its name to a decade.

And by the way, the year numbers that are used to communicate what decade you're talking about are not an exercise in math or a concept - "flower power' was 1960-70 and "disco Queen" was 1970-80. This is not meant to add up like fractions, especially considering the social phenomenons so snap-shot will overlap somewhat, so stop splitting hairs.

Lise from Montreal
Comment: #8
Posted by: Lise Brouillette
Sun Feb 7, 2010 8:24 AM
Once again The Annies have shown they've made a career out of stating the obvious. "It sounds like they both could use a professional intervention." Really? Ya think? Wow. Here's what LW1 needs to do: contact the abuse hotline for guidance, contact an attorney and get out. The dynamics of your marriage have changed forever and will not change. Get the hell out and don't look back. Your husband and stepdaugher will never get counseling. He's an idiot and she's a pig. Leave.
Comment: #9
Posted by: Rick
Sun Feb 7, 2010 8:38 AM
Re: Rick: Right, but some people need to have the obvious stated to them, otherwise they wouldn't write. And when the seemingly obvious advice comes from an authority (not just a friend or relative), they are more apt to pay attention. I certainly hope "Fed Up" does get out of there.
Comment: #10
Posted by: Van Wickle
Sun Feb 7, 2010 10:10 AM
I know this is a hopelessly lost cause; but I have to reply to the person who wrote about this being the start of a new decade. The new decade does not start until next year. 2011. The new century started in 2001 and , therefore, ends on December 31, 2010.
Thanks for letting me vent.
Comment: #11
Posted by: Kathleen
Sun Feb 7, 2010 10:11 AM
I don't understand the confusion over what to call the decade. I'm an editor, and all the publishers I work for call it the 2000s, just like the 1900s and the 1800s. The next decade will be the 2010s, then the 2020s, etc., like the 1910s, 1920s, and so forth. Just because there's an extra "0" doesn't mean the rules are thrown out the window.
Comment: #12
Posted by: Joyce
Sun Feb 7, 2010 10:27 AM
I don't understand why there's confusion over what to call the decade. I'm an editor, and all the publishers I work for call it the 2000s, just like the 1900s. Then will follow the 2010s, 2020s, etc., just like the 1910s, 1920s, and so forth. Just because there's an extra "0" doesn't mean the rules change.
Comment: #13
Posted by: Joyce
Sun Feb 7, 2010 10:30 AM
Re: Miss Pasko: You're wrong and they're right. Think about a decade like the 1920s, which everyone knows ran from January 1, 1920, to December 31, 1929. Using your logic, the 1920s would not include the year 1920! With your way of thinking, the 1920s would run from January 1, 1921, to December 31, 1930, which is obviously wrong!
Comment: #14
Posted by: Joyce
Sun Feb 7, 2010 10:37 AM
Re: swargaski: You are right. It's that third digit that's key. The 1990s began with 1990, the 1980s with 1980, and so on. Saying the new decade doesn't begin until 2011 is like saying the 1950s didn't begin until 1951.
Comment: #15
Posted by: Van Wickle
Sun Feb 7, 2010 10:41 AM
Re: Joyce: But the 1900s refers to the whole century (1900-1999)! The 2000s is the correct name for this century, but what about the decade that just ended? I suppose the decade might be called the 2000s for now and something else later, if and when one of the proposed terms becomes dominant. Or it just might be referred to as the "first decade."
Comment: #16
Posted by: Van Wickle
Sun Feb 7, 2010 10:55 AM
Re: Van Wickle: I just want to add that when people are upset/hurt/confused/manipulated enough, they may not be capable of seeing "the obvious." Which includes not just the people who write in, but all the others out there in similar situations who read the advice and may be helped by it.
Comment: #17
Posted by: Van Wickle
Sun Feb 7, 2010 11:01 AM
Re: Van Wickle: I just want to add that when people are upset/hurt/confused/manipulated enough, they may not be capable of seeing "the obvious." Which includes not just the people who write in, but all the others out there in similar situations who read the advice and may be helped by it.
Comment: #18
Posted by: Van Wickle
Sun Feb 7, 2010 11:07 AM
Re: Miss Pasko The world is not 2010 years old. Western world deals with BC and AD. Think of this issue as a ruler. It does begin with 0 and not one. To have one year you must begin with zero. This truely is middle school math.
Comment: #19
Posted by: Penny
Sun Feb 7, 2010 1:59 PM
Re: swargaski - You teach middle school math and you try to make kids accept the idea of a Year Zero?? I'm sure you also told them that the twenty-first century began in the year 2000 - which it did not. The twentieth century ENDED with the year 2000. Check with the Naval Observatory or any real mathematician if you want to know the truth about this.
Comment: #20
Posted by: Maggie Lawrence
Sun Feb 7, 2010 2:21 PM
I've been calling the decade "The Turn of the Millennium."
Comment: #21
Posted by: Gail
Sun Feb 7, 2010 2:31 PM
I think of this decade that has just past (or is passing, depending on how one counts) as the late 90s :D
Comment: #22
Posted by: Dew
Sun Feb 7, 2010 7:25 PM
I remember this being a hot topic on ther morning talk shows along with Y2K. It was finally decided that the common man didn't really care when the new millenium began, he just wanted to have a party when the numbers changed.
Comment: #23
Posted by: SueWho
Sun Feb 7, 2010 7:25 PM
Re: 20 years...I am a drywall contractor so obviously my job cannot be done outside, but we've always worn "booties"...they are an inexpensive pair of disposable paper shoes that can be worn over shoes/boots and then thrown away. One may find them at any home improvement store...my homeowners appreciate them because I can walk through their homes to get to the work area without having to go to all the trouble of putting down paper or plastic...just fyi! - Drywall lady
Comment: #24
Posted by: Deborah
Mon Feb 8, 2010 6:34 AM
Van Winkle is correct. And If they miscounted the first year or called it year zero way back when, that's their problem. A decade is a decade - 10 years. The 1970s started Jan. 1, 1970 and ended Dec. 31, 1979 - that's 10 years. By the logic of these fools who think the second decade of this century doesn't start until 2011, the decade of the 70s includes the year 1980 and that the 80s didn't start until 1981 or that you're not in your 30s until you're 31, etc. It's silly. We are in the first year of the 10s. We have completed the first 10 years of this century (the decade of Jan. 1, 2000 to Dec. 31. 2009). Ten years from now, we'll be starting the decade of the 20s. Why is that so hard to understand?
Comment: #25
Posted by: Moops
Mon Feb 8, 2010 11:59 AM
There is no year 0!!
We start at Jan 1 year 1 to Dec 31 Year 1 = 1 YEAR
Then it is Jan 1, year2 to Dec 31 year 2 = 2 YEARS
Then again Jan 1, year 3 to Dec 31 year3 = 3 YEARS
......
Jan 1 year 2010 to Dec 31 year 2010 = 10 Years .
We still have 10 month 1/2 to go to finish our 10th year, the decade is NOT over!! It will be on Dec 31 2010 at midnight
Comment: #26
Posted by: Mom
Tue Feb 9, 2010 1:16 PM
Re: Moops
There is no year 0!! We start at Jan 1 year 1 to Dec 31 Year 1 = 1 YEAR Then it is Jan 1, year2 to Dec 31 year 2 = 2 YEARS Then again Jan 1, year 3 to Dec 31 year3 = 3 YEARS ...... Jan 1 year 2010 to Dec 31 year 2010 = 10 Years . We still have 10 month 1/2 to go to finish our 10th year, the decade is NOT over!! It will be on Dec 31 2010 at midnight

Comment: #26
Comment: #27
Posted by: Mom
Tue Feb 9, 2010 1:19 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Kathy Mitchell and Marcy Sugar
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month