creators home
creators.com lifestyle web

Recently

Hands Are Tied when a Messed-Up Child Is a Legal Adult Dear Annie: My 20-year-old nephew has been a troubled youth, despite all the attempts of his family to help him, including counseling and rehab. When he was 18, he became involved with a messed-up 14-year-old girl who used drugs, alcohol and sex to …Read more. Damaging Favoritism Amid Broken Boundaries Dear Annie: I have two daughters, ages 5 and 2. My in-laws favor the older girl. They buy her more presents, give her more money and pay way more attention to her than to her sister. They almost seem obsessed with her. As soon as she walks in the …Read more. Ex Con on the Straight and Narrow Canned Dear Annie: After eight years at my job, I was let go. I have a felony record. The CEO who knew of my background retired last year. He felt I had proved myself and had no problem with me. When he retired, we got an interim CEO. I told him about my …Read more. Equal Parts Heart Over Equal Parts Money Dear Annie: My husband and I work comparable hours, but I earn less than half of what he does and have little discretionary income. I come home to my "second shift," which includes cooking, cleaning and picking up after this man, who …Read more.
more articles

Annie's Mailbox®, January 14

Share Comment

Dear Annie: I am one of four sisters, all of us in our 50s. We are a close-knit family, although we no longer live in the same communities.

My niece, "Tara," gave birth to a son while she was still in high school. A wonderful couple adopted the boy, and because the adoption was open, they have stayed in contact. The baby had some health issues, which they initially attributed to the lack of prenatal care. Two years later, Tara gave birth to her second out-of-wedlock son just as her first was diagnosed with Duchenne's muscular dystrophy. There is no history of this in the family, and my niece was deemed a spontaneous carrier. Her second child has it, too.

When these two were diagnosed, the doctors explained that, barring a miracle, her sons would face an increasingly painful life and an early death. They also told her she could pass along the disease to future children. Tara didn't care. Five years ago, she met a divorced man with three boys, and they have since had three more children together. Blessedly, two of the children are girls and will not develop the disease, although they could be carriers. The third child is a boy who, astoundingly, is healthy. But she plans to have more children.

No one can get through to Tara that she is playing genetic Russian roulette with her children's lives. These are children, by the way, whom neither she nor her partner can afford, and we have no idea how she plans to care for a child who might become disabled. How do we continue to love and support her when we are all so upset with the situation? — Heartsick in the Heartland

Dear Heartsick: You sigh deeply and say nothing. Tara is a grown woman, and these are her choices, smart or not. Be a kind and loving great-aunt to these children, and try to keep your opinions out of it. That's as supportive as you need to be.

Dear Annie: My 20-year-old daughter is fantastic.

She's smart, funny, compassionate, involved and has a beautiful, warm, friendly face. Her problem is that although she works out, she is short and a little heavy. And she doesn't know how to dress to "accentuate the positive and eliminate the negative."

I want to help her, but am afraid of hurting her feelings and don't know enough about the details of fashion to teach her. Also, she probably would not take my advice on this topic. Is there a book I could give her? Should I ask her mother to deliver the message? — Loving Dad

Dear Dad: Mom may already have done so and met with little success. Your libraries and bookstores are filled with books on how to dress, but they won't help your daughter if she perceives your overtures as unwelcome criticism. If she works out, she is probably healthy, so try not to fixate on her weight. If you want her to dress differently but don't know how to do it, talk to her mother about what might be more flattering and buy her a new outfit for her next birthday.

Dear Annie: This is in response to "Louisville Lass," whose children receive too many presents.

When my daughter was born, we received mountains of toys and clothes from our families. I didn't want to offend the givers, so now I suggest different types of gifts for my daughter: a year's membership to the local zoo or children's museum, or tickets to local, low-cost events, such as kids' concerts, plays or book readings.

These gifts allow me to spend time with my child in an educational or cultural setting, and we send the giver pictures throughout the year of the fun ways she is enjoying their gift. It has worked beautifully for us. — S.W.

Dear S.W.: This is a lovely suggestion, and we hope those who are looking for gift ideas will consider yours.

Annie's Mailbox is written by Kathy Mitchell and Marcy Sugar, longtime editors of the Ann Landers column. Please e-mail your questions to anniesmailbox@comcast.net, or write to: Annie's Mailbox, P.O. Box 118190, Chicago, IL 60611. To find out more about Annie's Mailbox, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM


Comments

6 Comments | Post Comment
LW1: While the LW may be rightfully concerned about how "Tara" is going to support her children without government assistance, I think she's a little off-base in the rest of her remarks. She seems to be implying that Tara shouldn't have more kids because the risk of birth defects is too high, even after admitting that three more have been born healthy since those first two. (I know this is a leap, but it almost sounds like she's one of those people who believe that "society" has an interest in telling such women that they have no right to reproduce.) This is a personal decision on Tara's part and the ladies' advice was good - the LW needs to stay out of Tara's business.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Matt
Wed Jan 13, 2010 11:12 PM
Matt, society DOES have an interest in how many children women like Tara have when we as taxpayers are asked to pay for their medical care or basic welfare. The writer pointed out that Tara and her husband could barely afford the ones they have.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Maggie Lawrence
Thu Jan 14, 2010 4:23 AM
Re: Maggie Lawrence -- I am with you on this. She had three helathy kids and two unhealthy. The risk is too big for more kids. Any kids born now have a huge possibility of not being healthy. Kids should not pay the price for her stupidity and taxpayers should not foot the bill for her stupidity. Sometimes reproduction should NOT be left up to the so called mother. I say so called mother because a REAL, LOVING mother would never be so compulsive, careless, thoughtless, unfeeling and yes, stupid!
Comment: #3
Posted by: Cathy
Thu Jan 14, 2010 4:55 PM
Wow, some harsh comments here.
While I agree that it's irresponsible to have children you cannot afford, it's also common for women who carry genes for disorders like Duchenne muscular dystrophy to have embryonic testing on subsequent pregnancies. I wonder if "Tara's" other children were born healthy because she had this done. We're only getting the aunt's side of the story here. Financial issues aside, there's no reason why she couldn't have more children via IVF & embryo selection.
I don't know what it's like to have two children who are terminally ill, but my sister has 2 special-needs children and she says that the hardest part is dealing with snark from rude, holier-than-thou strangers who know absolutely nothing about her situation. It's sick and sad, really. I wonder what would happen if the aunt reached out to her niece with loving advice, rather than criticism and head-shaking?
Comment: #4
Posted by: TimTam
Thu Jan 14, 2010 5:57 PM
Re: TimTam --My comment may be harsh but it's no where near as harsh as the life those two chidren are going to have. And any other children most likely will have. Your sister has two special needs kids and kudos to her for caring for them. But it is unfeeling and sad that any parent would bring forth innocent children into the world when they know the odds are already stacked against them. It breaks my heart to see any child ridiculed or in pain. Why would someone purposely subject a child to that? It also sounds like the aunt has already talked to this *mother*.
Comment: #5
Posted by: Cathy
Thu Jan 14, 2010 7:11 PM
Re: Maggie Lawrence. So what's your answer, then? A license to have children, which is only granted by the government when it is convinced that a couple A) can "afford them" and B) has a high probability that they're not going to give birth to a kid with special needs? Careful. That's the road you're headed down, and it leads to policies like what they have in China today.
Comment: #6
Posted by: Matt
Sat Jan 16, 2010 10:12 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Kathy Mitchell and Marcy Sugar
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month