Recently
Forty Years Frozen
Dear Annie: After more than 40 years of devotion to my husband, I have finally realized what a stonehearted jerk he is. I have done everything in my power to love, respect and encourage him. But I've fallen into a pattern of picking up the pieces of …Read more.
Envying the Enabled
Dear Annie: My brother and sister and I had an amazing childhood. Our parents stressed the importance of hard work and education. The three of us got advanced degrees, and my sister and I entered the workforce after graduation.
Our brother, …Read more.
Kelsey Mately
Dear Annie: My husband's sister "Kelsey" filed for divorce a few months ago. Her soon-to-be ex-husband kept in touch. He told me that Kelsey had been cheating on him with the guy she is currently seeing. I didn't want to believe him, but …Read more.
His Problem Goes Way Beyond Age
Dear Annie: Five months ago, I met "Abby" at my job. We have a lot in common and have become close. We flirt with each other. Here's the problem. Abby is 41, and I am 20. She looks and acts much younger.
Abby is in a terrible relationship …Read more.
more articles
|
A Universal Signal
Dear Annie: You recently printed a letter from "Worried Driver in Lafayette, Ind.," who asked for a universal sign to tell drivers to hang up their cellphones.
As a psychology instructor, this subject often comes up in class when discussing signs as communication. The most used response is to flash the "call me" sign and then invert it, or rotate the thumb down, which looks like hanging up. However, as my students always note, the recipients tend to retaliate with the Royal Bird salute because they are in their "eminent domain" — their sovereign vehicle — within which they feel they have complete authority and will resist, often emotionally, any intrusion. — Louisville, Ky.
Dear Louisville: Hundreds of readers replied with suggestions, and yours was the most popular. Our thanks to everyone who contributed. Read on for more:
From Miamisburg, Ohio: To indicate someone's cellphone use is affecting their driving, how about making the sign for "call me" and then moving the hand to make a slashing gesture under the chin? In other words, cut the call.
Quebec: I made a sign with a picture of a cellphone and a line through it and put it in my car windows. It says, "Please don't text or talk while driving."
We travel from Canada to Florida, and I use this for the whole trip.
Massachusetts: My 15-year-old daughter said she witnessed someone texting and driving. I was horrified when she told me she gave them the finger. She laughed and said, "Mom, 'the finger,' as in wiggling it back and forth and saying 'tsk, tsk.'" Our 12-year-old loved this idea and used it when he saw a driver talking on his phone. Amazingly, the driver looked at him, nodded in agreement and put the phone in his shirt pocket.
Texas: My suggestion is to just forget it. Using your phone while driving is simply rude. If you were to actually catch their attention and ask them to hang up, the response definitely would be a hand signal — and you know which one.
Florida: I hold up a hand with my thumb below the other fingers (like a duck's mouth) and snap them together — signaling "stop yakking."
Boston: My advice would be for her to pay attention to her own driving instead of rubbernecking to see what other drivers are doing.
Kansas: How about a "thumbs down"? It is almost universally accepted as a gesture of disdain and disapproval.
Nebraska: Try this: Make the "call me" gesture, and then shake your index finger at them three times, which means "naughty, naughty, naughty."
Chicago: Use the recognized gesture for "call me" while shaking your head "no."
Lafayette, Ind.: I suggest the old thumb and forefinger slid across the lips, as in "zip it."
Saskatoon: Why is she fretting about being nice? Since when does diplomacy count when our lives may be in danger? I do as my mother would have done. I shake my index finger at them. Not surprisingly, many offenders take their remaining free hand off the steering wheel and raise their middle finger at me. Perhaps the answer is to drive a huge truck and simply push these drivers off the road.
Huntley, Ill.: If a cellphone user is behind me on a four-lane road, I slow down to allow them to pass. The slowing is a message of my concern, and it also removes the likelihood of a rear-end collision. Once, when I was traveling on I-55, I slowed and the guy passed to the far left, but he was so intent on his phone that he missed the "lane closed" signs and didn't notice the barrels blocking the road 500 yards ahead. He just plowed right into them, causing great damage to his fancy Mercedes.
Annie's Mailbox is written by Kathy Mitchell and Marcy Sugar, longtime editors of the Ann Landers column. Please e-mail your questions to anniesmailbox@comcast.net, or write to: Annie's Mailbox, c/o Creators Syndicate, 5777 W. Century Blvd., Ste. 700, Los Angeles, CA 90045. To find out more about Annie's Mailbox and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.
COPYRIGHT 2012 CREATORS.COM

|
 |
Comments
|
29 Comments | Post Comment
|
|
Annies, can you please do another full column on cell phone hand signals tomorrow, please? I do not fully understand how to execute these signals and could use more ideas, such as how to do these signals while touching up my lipstick and/or eating a banana.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Zoe
Sat Jan 7, 2012 10:11 PM
|
|
|
|
Re: Zoe
I am also wondering how to do these signals while reading, combing my hair, shaving, or changing my shirt while driving to work in the morning.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Paul
Sat Jan 7, 2012 10:28 PM
|
|
|
|
LW1-
I hate to say this, but people who talk on the cell and especially TEXT while driving are not going to be very receptive to signs, printed or finger-made or whatever. They "know better" and they don't give a damn. I agree they're arrogant, obnoxious public dangers, but there ain't nothin' you can do about it except having eyes on the back of your head. Try. It's way safer than looking at them and trying to teach them basic sense.
I remember the original letter. I said I made a "ooooh" sorry face, flung me hands to my face and mouthed "I'm sorry" whenever I did something I wish I hadn't THAT ANOTHER DRIVER NOTICED ENOUGH TO HONK ME ABOUT (doesn't happen often). I would NOT put up a sign "don't talk on the phone or text" through my window. Ask for a road-rager to ram you, why don't you. Massachusets' daughter was lucky. You never know what kind of (possibly armed) crazy nut case is driving next to you.
What "Boston" says sums it all - pay attention to your own driving, all the more because of all these texting idiots. As for me, I rarely notice whether the other drivers are cell-phoning or texting or eating or putting on their make-up (etc etc etc), since I'm busy paying attention to the road and to what THE CARS next to me are doing - not their drivers.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Lise Brouillette
Sat Jan 7, 2012 11:00 PM
|
|
|
|
Re: Paul
I just tried practicing these signals while talking around my apartment and tripped and broke a Ming vase. I'll let you know if I come up with any other signal ideas that are easier to coordinate. Maybe a system of blinks - morse code with your eyes. Sounds pretty safe!
Re: Lise B
Ah, I recognize the words of a Montrealer when it comes to drivers! Y'all are full o' road rage o'er the border, I've noticed ;) ! Still, I bet you could give the finger to everyone, all day, and have few incidents - most people aren't vehicular manslaughter waiting to happen. That said, I too agree with Boston... Trying to figure out how to do these signals, and to get the other driver's attention, could just as easily cause a distraction-borne accident!
Comment: #4
Posted by: Zoe
Sun Jan 8, 2012 12:48 AM
|
|
|
|
I agree with Zoe here. Today's column is pretty boring.
Annies? I think you read these comments (loved he joke a few days ago about menopause, noone else here seemed to catch it!) so may I make a suggestion or two?
1. Please don't follow Abby's lead and reseot to "read on"s too often. It's one of the things i like best about your column as a general rule, you rarely dedicate an entire column to it. Don't start now.
2. If you DO have a read on column (or, which is more often than not the case, a letter at the end of your regular column that is in response to another letter), please provide the date of the original letter. This will help those of us who are online to reread the original letter.
3, A big complaint I have seen on Abby's site is that the "read on"s are usually pretty trivial. The above column is a great example of that. You daily print letters that address some serious problems (child abuse and neglect, work problems, spousal issues) and answer them with a three line response, and BTL we have seen some fantastic ideas that could really help the LWs (and other people who may be in the same boat). Yes, sometimes we need a dose of brevity and a trivial letter is fun, but to dedicate an entire column to it is annoying.
Please understand that I am a huge fan of your column and think you both are among the hardest working of the advice columnists. You get more comments here at Creators than even Margo and she's got the whole wow engine behind her. Why? Because consistently day after day, you provide thought provoking letters. No two day a week job for you both. You both work hard and write a fantastic column. My above suggestions are just those, suggestions.
Comment: #5
Posted by: nanchan
Sun Jan 8, 2012 3:01 AM
|
|
|
|
I think the 12-year-old's idea is good - it tries to shame the offending driver, but not so much as to induce road rage. And the sign in the window is not a bad idea. I'd change it to say "Texting & Driving? I will pull over and call the cops." Or something like "Texting & Driving is against the law." Saying "Please" is of h\no use - why be so polite to those who don't care if they kill you?
Comment: #6
Posted by: Salty
Sun Jan 8, 2012 7:05 AM
|
|
|
|
Oh, no. Zoe, you are right that we will get another full column of these suggestions tomorrow...followed by one more at the bottom of every column for the next three years.
Comment: #7
Posted by: Jane
Sun Jan 8, 2012 7:13 AM
|
|
|
|
Dear Annie - When I encounter people who aren't driving like I think they should because they maybe talking on the phone, or texting, or talking to the person next to them, or smacking a kid in the back seat, or adjusting their rear view mirror, or pushing the radio dials, or singing, or smoking, or putting on makeup, or shaving, or drinking a beverage, or eating a burger, or have their little YorkaLhasaPomaPoo sitting in their lap and I wave my finger at them like "tsk-tsk" I can see them forming the words, "Mind your own business jerk wad". What's a non verbal signal I can give them that means, "Sorry I can't help it I'm just a big douche"?
Comment: #8
Posted by: Rick
Sun Jan 8, 2012 7:51 AM
|
|
|
|
The most boring column ever.
Yes, the driver who is violating the law (at least in my state as well as in some others) by talking on a hand-held phone or texting is really going to respond to a hand sign.
On the other hand, yesterday, I saw a driver who was looking at his passenger while he was talking to her. The freeway was slow-ish, so I could see him for quite a long time - maybe 5 minutes - and he only occasionally glanced at the road in front of him. That wasn't any safer than talking on the phone.
Comment: #9
Posted by: Ariana
Sun Jan 8, 2012 8:00 AM
|
|
|
|
Driving and using sign language to a deaf kid in the back seat is also tricky!
Comment: #10
Posted by: Stephanie
Sun Jan 8, 2012 8:20 AM
|
|
|
|
The worse I have ever seen was before the cell phone became so handy. I saw a lady driving with a hamburger in one hand and a cigarette in the other. Then, she'd rest the hamburger on the steering wheel while she put on lipstick. Where was the hand she was using for driving? The traffic was going very slowly, but, still!!!
Comment: #11
Posted by: Lila
Sun Jan 8, 2012 9:03 AM
|
|
|
|
I might want to add: any sign posted in your window diminishes your own visibility - BAD IDEA, especially with most cars which are hugging low to the road and whose visivility is not that good - compared to mine, trucks' and busses'.
@Zoe
Yep, Montreal drivers are known for their bad temper, thank God there isn't much of a gun culture here... I find Quebec drivers in general rude, enraged, heavy-footed and not that competent behind a wheel. Both as a pedestrian and a driver. Lots of little bo-boys out there with a Hot Wheel complex, who think their precious car is an extension to their penis. Angry women suffering from penis envy can be worse and cyclists suffering from car envy ARE worse - obnoxious, into your face and behaving like they have priority everywhere.
Add to the equation the possibly dismal weather conditions (Let's see - yesterday was freezing rain, rain and snow depending where and when), permanent roadworks and detours (Mayor Tremblay is the worst I've ever seen in the 37 years I've lived in Montreal, I HATE that man), potholes galore and third-world conditions of the roads, driving in Montreal can be... difficult.
@Lila
Reminds me of cab drivers in Trinidad.
Comment: #12
Posted by: Lise Brouillette
Sun Jan 8, 2012 9:50 AM
|
|
|
|
Trying to change other drivers' bad habits by signalling can be an additional, potentially dangerous, distraction. It is up to lawmakers and law enforcement officials to curb such behaviour (yes I'm Canadian and from Montréal). We should also recognise that there are very bad drivers regardless of distractions. Many of whom drive worse than others who use their phones while driving. I was once rear ended by a teen who was busy tuning his factory-installed radio. There is no replacement for common sense, and common sense is ironically uncommon.
We need more driver education campaigns to promote and model safe and courteous driving habits. And perhaps fewer car ads showing James Bond-like Kamikaze stunts.
Comment: #13
Posted by: Stephen Ghantous
Sun Jan 8, 2012 10:52 AM
|
|
|
|
I like the suggestion from Quebec! "Please stop paying attention to your phone, so you can pay attention to this lengthy sign I wrote. Nah, don't worry about the road. Enough people are paying attention to that"
Comment: #14
Posted by: Casey
Sun Jan 8, 2012 10:54 AM
|
|
|
|
Good question, Rick. Trying shrugging your shoulders with a smirk on your face!
Comment: #15
Posted by: Casey
Sun Jan 8, 2012 10:55 AM
|
|
|
|
I agree with the writer from Boston. I hardly notice what people are doing inside their cars because I'm paying attention to the road. I would think peering into cars and trying to get the driver's attention is just as dangerous as using a cell phone.
Comment: #16
Posted by: Renee J
Sun Jan 8, 2012 11:22 AM
|
|
|
|
Re: Stephen Ghantous
Couldn't agree with you more. I always say myself that common sense isn't so common... I've only been driving for a few years, regularly only since July, and the things I've seen already...
Comment: #17
Posted by: Lise Brouillette
Sun Jan 8, 2012 12:19 PM
|
|
|
|
LOL @ Rick!
Comment: #18
Posted by: sharnee
Sun Jan 8, 2012 1:18 PM
|
|
|
|
There are studies that show that cell phone usage is way more dangerous than talking to someone else in the same car, for obvious reasons... the person sitting next to you is probably going to notice you are veering off the road. The guy at the other end of the cell phone is just going to hear the sound of you dying as your car smashes into a barrier.
I don't spend time looking at other drivers, but it's pretty impossible to miss when the woman in front of you grabs her cellphone from the dash and puts it to her ear and starts yakking. When I see someone doing something dangerous like that, I don't try to correct them, I just try to put some distance in between us.
Dave
Comment: #19
Posted by: dave
Sun Jan 8, 2012 1:31 PM
|
|
|
|
Please be real! The fact is when you are observing someone talking on their cell and you are trying to get their attention by using hand signals that means YOUR eyes are not on the road!
Comment: #20
Posted by: Cathy
Sun Jan 8, 2012 2:56 PM
|
|
|
|
I'm with Lise and Dave - concentrate on your own driving rather than trying to parent the whole of society. I don't use hand signals, I get in a different lane same as I do if there is a suspected drunk driver next to me. And to be quite frank, regardless of what it's about, I am not receptive to strangers chastising me - it's that rebellious side of me that keeps popping up from time to time.
Comment: #21
Posted by: kristen
Sun Jan 8, 2012 3:04 PM
|
|
|
|
People were expected to use caution when CB radios were popular. For some reason they didn't follow this when it came to cell phones.
Comment: #22
Posted by: Paul
Sun Jan 8, 2012 3:46 PM
|
|
|
|
Re: Paul - And CB users didn't use caution either.
Comment: #23
Posted by: Rick
Sun Jan 8, 2012 4:08 PM
|
|
|
|
To everyone who said devoting an entire column to this subject was boring/stupid/a waste of time----AMEN!!
But what you don't realize is that the Annies decide occasionally that while they, of course, wish to be PAID for their daily column, they do not actually wish to devote any time or energy to WRITING a daily column. So sometimes they do something like this. Presto-----print a bunch of boring letters from readers regarding an unimportant 'problem', and sit back and collect their pay.
Now, if we are lucky, maybe tomorrow we can have something devoted to a fire safety issue, or a reprint of Ann Landers' delicious lemon cream pie recipe from 40 years ago.
An advice column, I believe, is defined as something that states a problem and then issues ADVICE (given BY THE COLUMNIST) for handling the problem. At least, that's why I read advice columns. Today's was a total waste of time.
Comment: #24
Posted by: jennylee
Sun Jan 8, 2012 6:22 PM
|
|
|
|
I agree the column was a waste of space -- the fundamental flaw being that trying to "converse" with other drivers is a safety risk. That's what I think the Annies missed.
jennylee -- it is in some ways more challenging to create a roundup of reader response than it is to expound on a subject yourself. I don't begrudge them that, and I don't begrudge them the occasional public service column. But I do expect them to think through the logical consequences of advocating trying to engage with someone else when you're both supposed to be driving your vehicles safely. This particular discussion was irresponsible, IMO.
Comment: #25
Posted by: hedgehog
Sun Jan 8, 2012 6:51 PM
|
|
|
|
I write a newsletter for a dance club. I've been requested to put a humorous comment in the newsletter to gently ask sick people to stay home from club events so as not to spread illnesses. It is now cold and flu season, and I am completely at a loss how to do this without hurting anyone's feelings! Help!
Comment: #26
Posted by: Mary Lewis
Sun Jan 8, 2012 7:34 PM
|
|
|
|
Re: Mary Lewis
One-two (cough), one-two, one-two (cough)
"You don't want to miss it, but your cough is off-beat, so you ARE missing it! Stay home and miss a class, and come back and don't miss a beat!"
Don't know if that helps. If I think of anything else, I'll post it!
Comment: #27
Posted by: Lise Brouillette
Sun Jan 8, 2012 7:48 PM
|
|
|
|
Mayb they print boring columns because it's all the btw frequent posters society can handle without going nuclear on each other
Comment: #28
Posted by: Jpp
Sun Jan 8, 2012 8:58 PM
|
|
|
|
ALL
Thank you for the eloquent selection of situations that you have adumbrated. Communication may never be the same again.
```
Comment: #29
Posted by: Word A Day Mate
Tue Jan 17, 2012 5:18 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|